Cargando…

Empirical comparison of color normalization methods for epithelial-stromal classification in H and E images

CONTEXT: Color normalization techniques for histology have not been empirically tested for their utility for computational pathology pipelines. AIMS: We compared two contemporary techniques for achieving a common intermediate goal – epithelial-stromal classification. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Expert-anno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sethi, Amit, Sha, Lingdao, Vahadane, Abhishek Ramnath, Deaton, Ryan J., Kumar, Neeraj, Macias, Virgilia, Gann, Peter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27141322
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.179984
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Color normalization techniques for histology have not been empirically tested for their utility for computational pathology pipelines. AIMS: We compared two contemporary techniques for achieving a common intermediate goal – epithelial-stromal classification. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Expert-annotated regions of epithelium and stroma were treated as ground truth for comparing classifiers on original and color-normalized images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Epithelial and stromal regions were annotated on thirty diverse-appearing H and E stained prostate cancer tissue microarray cores. Corresponding sets of thirty images each were generated using the two color normalization techniques. Color metrics were compared for original and color-normalized images. Separate epithelial-stromal classifiers were trained and compared on test images. Main analyses were conducted using a multiresolution segmentation (MRS) approach; comparative analyses using two other classification approaches (convolutional neural network [CNN], Wndchrm) were also performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images. For CNN and Wndchrm, pixel classification test-AUCs were compared. RESULTS: Khan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance. Super-pixel-level test-AUC for MRS was 0.010–0.025 (95% confidence interval limits ± 0.004) higher for the two normalized image sets compared to the original in the 10–80 variable range. Improvement in pixel classification accuracy was also observed for CNN and Wndchrm for color-normalized images. CONCLUSIONS: Color normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.