Cargando…

The TOUCH program and natalizumab: Fundamental flaw in patient protection

Many drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 1993 for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). One such drug is natalizumab (Tysabri, Biogen Idec and Elan pharmaceuticals) which has enjoyed great success in the management of MS since its re-introducti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Avasarala, Jagannadha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134725
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7513.3
_version_ 1782427933065871360
author Avasarala, Jagannadha
author_facet Avasarala, Jagannadha
author_sort Avasarala, Jagannadha
collection PubMed
description Many drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 1993 for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). One such drug is natalizumab (Tysabri, Biogen Idec and Elan pharmaceuticals) which has enjoyed great success in the management of MS since its re-introduction in 2006. One of the complications of using natalizumab is the risk of development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). To mitigate the risk of PML development, Biogen Idec initiated the TOUCH program – this strategy helps monitor the disease. Clinical vigilance remains key in the early diagnosis of PML but serological testing for the John Cunningham Virus Antibody (JCV) helps with risk stratification of PML. However, some physicians do not test for the JCV Ab and since they are not required to send such data to the company or inform the patient, one red flag for suspicion of PML is lost particularly if the patient is asymptomatic.  This undercuts the premise of the TOUCH program. In an ideal world, reporting JCV Ab status should be made mandatory since that ensures a basic tenet of the program is met – to identify patients at increased risk of developing PML and make appropriate recommendations based on that finding. Lack of requirement of reporting of this vital finding opens the door for uncertainty in assessment of risk PML development and everyone remains in the dark till it may be too late. This is unacceptable when the company created the TOUCH program specifically with intent to track PML risk in patients on natalizumab. It makes no scientific sense to let the drug be used without setting stringent criteria given the possibility of PML development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4837976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48379762016-04-29 The TOUCH program and natalizumab: Fundamental flaw in patient protection Avasarala, Jagannadha F1000Res Opinion Article Many drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 1993 for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). One such drug is natalizumab (Tysabri, Biogen Idec and Elan pharmaceuticals) which has enjoyed great success in the management of MS since its re-introduction in 2006. One of the complications of using natalizumab is the risk of development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). To mitigate the risk of PML development, Biogen Idec initiated the TOUCH program – this strategy helps monitor the disease. Clinical vigilance remains key in the early diagnosis of PML but serological testing for the John Cunningham Virus Antibody (JCV) helps with risk stratification of PML. However, some physicians do not test for the JCV Ab and since they are not required to send such data to the company or inform the patient, one red flag for suspicion of PML is lost particularly if the patient is asymptomatic.  This undercuts the premise of the TOUCH program. In an ideal world, reporting JCV Ab status should be made mandatory since that ensures a basic tenet of the program is met – to identify patients at increased risk of developing PML and make appropriate recommendations based on that finding. Lack of requirement of reporting of this vital finding opens the door for uncertainty in assessment of risk PML development and everyone remains in the dark till it may be too late. This is unacceptable when the company created the TOUCH program specifically with intent to track PML risk in patients on natalizumab. It makes no scientific sense to let the drug be used without setting stringent criteria given the possibility of PML development. F1000Research 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4837976/ /pubmed/27134725 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7513.3 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Avasarala J http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion Article
Avasarala, Jagannadha
The TOUCH program and natalizumab: Fundamental flaw in patient protection
title The TOUCH program and natalizumab: Fundamental flaw in patient protection
title_full The TOUCH program and natalizumab: Fundamental flaw in patient protection
title_fullStr The TOUCH program and natalizumab: Fundamental flaw in patient protection
title_full_unstemmed The TOUCH program and natalizumab: Fundamental flaw in patient protection
title_short The TOUCH program and natalizumab: Fundamental flaw in patient protection
title_sort touch program and natalizumab: fundamental flaw in patient protection
topic Opinion Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134725
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7513.3
work_keys_str_mv AT avasaralajagannadha thetouchprogramandnatalizumabfundamentalflawinpatientprotection
AT avasaralajagannadha touchprogramandnatalizumabfundamentalflawinpatientprotection