Cargando…
Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations
BACKGROUND: While there is increasing evidence that Advance Care Planning has the potential to strengthen patient autonomy and improve quality of care near the end of life, it remains unclear whether it could also reduce net costs of care. AIM: This study aims to describe the cost implications of Ad...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26294218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216315601346 |
_version_ | 1782427948651905024 |
---|---|
author | Klingler, Corinna in der Schmitten, Jürgen Marckmann, Georg |
author_facet | Klingler, Corinna in der Schmitten, Jürgen Marckmann, Georg |
author_sort | Klingler, Corinna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While there is increasing evidence that Advance Care Planning has the potential to strengthen patient autonomy and improve quality of care near the end of life, it remains unclear whether it could also reduce net costs of care. AIM: This study aims to describe the cost implications of Advance Care Planning programmes and discusses ethical conflicts arising in this context. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the databases PubMed, NHS EED, EURONHEED, Cochrane Library and EconLit. We included empirical studies (no limitation to study type) that investigated the cost implications of Advance Care Planning programmes involving professionally facilitated end-of-life discussions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Four of them used a randomised controlled design, one used a before-after design and two were observational studies. Six studies found reductions in costs of care ranging from USD1041 to USD64,827 per patient, depending on the study period and the cost measurement. One study detected no differences in costs. Studies varied considerably regarding the Advance Care Planning intervention, patient selection and costs measured which may explain some of the variations in findings. NORMATIVE APPRAISAL: Looking at the impact of Advance Care Planning on costs raises delicate ethical issues. Given the increasing pressure to reduce expenditures, there may be concerns that cost considerations could unduly influence the sensitive communication process, thus jeopardising patient autonomy. Safeguards are proposed to reduce these risks. CONCLUSION: The limited data indicate net cost savings may be realised with Advance Care Planning. Methodologically robust trials with clearly defined Advance Care Planning interventions are needed to make the costs and returns of Advance Care Planning transparent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4838173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48381732016-04-22 Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations Klingler, Corinna in der Schmitten, Jürgen Marckmann, Georg Palliat Med Review Articles BACKGROUND: While there is increasing evidence that Advance Care Planning has the potential to strengthen patient autonomy and improve quality of care near the end of life, it remains unclear whether it could also reduce net costs of care. AIM: This study aims to describe the cost implications of Advance Care Planning programmes and discusses ethical conflicts arising in this context. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the databases PubMed, NHS EED, EURONHEED, Cochrane Library and EconLit. We included empirical studies (no limitation to study type) that investigated the cost implications of Advance Care Planning programmes involving professionally facilitated end-of-life discussions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Four of them used a randomised controlled design, one used a before-after design and two were observational studies. Six studies found reductions in costs of care ranging from USD1041 to USD64,827 per patient, depending on the study period and the cost measurement. One study detected no differences in costs. Studies varied considerably regarding the Advance Care Planning intervention, patient selection and costs measured which may explain some of the variations in findings. NORMATIVE APPRAISAL: Looking at the impact of Advance Care Planning on costs raises delicate ethical issues. Given the increasing pressure to reduce expenditures, there may be concerns that cost considerations could unduly influence the sensitive communication process, thus jeopardising patient autonomy. Safeguards are proposed to reduce these risks. CONCLUSION: The limited data indicate net cost savings may be realised with Advance Care Planning. Methodologically robust trials with clearly defined Advance Care Planning interventions are needed to make the costs and returns of Advance Care Planning transparent. SAGE Publications 2015-08-20 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4838173/ /pubmed/26294218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216315601346 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Klingler, Corinna in der Schmitten, Jürgen Marckmann, Georg Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations |
title | Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations |
title_full | Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations |
title_fullStr | Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations |
title_short | Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations |
title_sort | does facilitated advance care planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? systematic review and ethical considerations |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26294218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216315601346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klinglercorinna doesfacilitatedadvancecareplanningreducethecostsofcareneartheendoflifesystematicreviewandethicalconsiderations AT inderschmittenjurgen doesfacilitatedadvancecareplanningreducethecostsofcareneartheendoflifesystematicreviewandethicalconsiderations AT marckmanngeorg doesfacilitatedadvancecareplanningreducethecostsofcareneartheendoflifesystematicreviewandethicalconsiderations |