Cargando…
Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
BACKGROUND: Differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to ensuring appropriate management of patients, but can be challenging, especially when treating with insulin. The 2010 UK Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes were developed to help make the differentiation. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684961 |
_version_ | 1782427988623622144 |
---|---|
author | Hope, Suzy V Wienand-Barnett, Sophie Shepherd, Maggie King, Sophie M Fox, Charles Khunti, Kamlesh Oram, Richard A Knight, Bea A Hattersley, Andrew T Jones, Angus G Shields, Beverley M |
author_facet | Hope, Suzy V Wienand-Barnett, Sophie Shepherd, Maggie King, Sophie M Fox, Charles Khunti, Kamlesh Oram, Richard A Knight, Bea A Hattersley, Andrew T Jones, Angus G Shields, Beverley M |
author_sort | Hope, Suzy V |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to ensuring appropriate management of patients, but can be challenging, especially when treating with insulin. The 2010 UK Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes were developed to help make the differentiation. AIM: To assess diagnostic accuracy of the UK guidelines against ‘gold standard’ definitions of type 1 and type 2 diabetes based on measured C-peptide levels. DESIGN AND SETTING: In total, 601 adults with insulin-treated diabetes and diabetes duration ≥5 years were recruited in Devon, Northamptonshire, and Leicestershire. METHOD: Baseline information and home urine sample were collected. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) measures endogenous insulin production. Gold standard type 1 diabetes was defined as continuous insulin treatment within 3 years of diagnosis and absolute insulin deficiency (UCPCR<0.2 nmol/mmol ≥5 years post-diagnosis); all others classed as having type 2 diabetes. Diagnostic performance of the clinical criteria was assessed and other criteria explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: UK guidelines correctly classified 86% of participants. Most misclassifications occurred in patients classed as having type 1 diabetes who had significant endogenous insulin levels (57 out of 601; 9%); most in those diagnosed ≥35 years and treated with insulin from diagnosis, where 37 out of 66 (56%) were misclassified. Time to insulin and age at diagnosis performed best in predicting long-term endogenous insulin production (ROC AUC = 0.904 and 0.871); BMI was a less strong predictor of diabetes type (AUC = 0.824). CONCLUSION: Current UK guidelines provide a pragmatic clinical approach to classification reflecting long-term endogenous insulin production; caution is needed in older patients commencing insulin from diagnosis, where misclassification rates are increased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4838443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48384432016-05-02 Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis Hope, Suzy V Wienand-Barnett, Sophie Shepherd, Maggie King, Sophie M Fox, Charles Khunti, Kamlesh Oram, Richard A Knight, Bea A Hattersley, Andrew T Jones, Angus G Shields, Beverley M Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to ensuring appropriate management of patients, but can be challenging, especially when treating with insulin. The 2010 UK Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes were developed to help make the differentiation. AIM: To assess diagnostic accuracy of the UK guidelines against ‘gold standard’ definitions of type 1 and type 2 diabetes based on measured C-peptide levels. DESIGN AND SETTING: In total, 601 adults with insulin-treated diabetes and diabetes duration ≥5 years were recruited in Devon, Northamptonshire, and Leicestershire. METHOD: Baseline information and home urine sample were collected. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) measures endogenous insulin production. Gold standard type 1 diabetes was defined as continuous insulin treatment within 3 years of diagnosis and absolute insulin deficiency (UCPCR<0.2 nmol/mmol ≥5 years post-diagnosis); all others classed as having type 2 diabetes. Diagnostic performance of the clinical criteria was assessed and other criteria explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: UK guidelines correctly classified 86% of participants. Most misclassifications occurred in patients classed as having type 1 diabetes who had significant endogenous insulin levels (57 out of 601; 9%); most in those diagnosed ≥35 years and treated with insulin from diagnosis, where 37 out of 66 (56%) were misclassified. Time to insulin and age at diagnosis performed best in predicting long-term endogenous insulin production (ROC AUC = 0.904 and 0.871); BMI was a less strong predictor of diabetes type (AUC = 0.824). CONCLUSION: Current UK guidelines provide a pragmatic clinical approach to classification reflecting long-term endogenous insulin production; caution is needed in older patients commencing insulin from diagnosis, where misclassification rates are increased. Royal College of General Practitioners 2016-05 2016-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4838443/ /pubmed/27080317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684961 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2016 This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Hope, Suzy V Wienand-Barnett, Sophie Shepherd, Maggie King, Sophie M Fox, Charles Khunti, Kamlesh Oram, Richard A Knight, Bea A Hattersley, Andrew T Jones, Angus G Shields, Beverley M Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis |
title | Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis |
title_full | Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis |
title_short | Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis |
title_sort | practical classification guidelines for diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hopesuzyv practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT wienandbarnettsophie practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT shepherdmaggie practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT kingsophiem practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT foxcharles practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT khuntikamlesh practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT oramricharda practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT knightbeaa practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT hattersleyandrewt practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT jonesangusg practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis AT shieldsbeverleym practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis |