Cargando…

Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis

BACKGROUND: Differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to ensuring appropriate management of patients, but can be challenging, especially when treating with insulin. The 2010 UK Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes were developed to help make the differentiation. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hope, Suzy V, Wienand-Barnett, Sophie, Shepherd, Maggie, King, Sophie M, Fox, Charles, Khunti, Kamlesh, Oram, Richard A, Knight, Bea A, Hattersley, Andrew T, Jones, Angus G, Shields, Beverley M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684961
_version_ 1782427988623622144
author Hope, Suzy V
Wienand-Barnett, Sophie
Shepherd, Maggie
King, Sophie M
Fox, Charles
Khunti, Kamlesh
Oram, Richard A
Knight, Bea A
Hattersley, Andrew T
Jones, Angus G
Shields, Beverley M
author_facet Hope, Suzy V
Wienand-Barnett, Sophie
Shepherd, Maggie
King, Sophie M
Fox, Charles
Khunti, Kamlesh
Oram, Richard A
Knight, Bea A
Hattersley, Andrew T
Jones, Angus G
Shields, Beverley M
author_sort Hope, Suzy V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to ensuring appropriate management of patients, but can be challenging, especially when treating with insulin. The 2010 UK Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes were developed to help make the differentiation. AIM: To assess diagnostic accuracy of the UK guidelines against ‘gold standard’ definitions of type 1 and type 2 diabetes based on measured C-peptide levels. DESIGN AND SETTING: In total, 601 adults with insulin-treated diabetes and diabetes duration ≥5 years were recruited in Devon, Northamptonshire, and Leicestershire. METHOD: Baseline information and home urine sample were collected. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) measures endogenous insulin production. Gold standard type 1 diabetes was defined as continuous insulin treatment within 3 years of diagnosis and absolute insulin deficiency (UCPCR<0.2 nmol/mmol ≥5 years post-diagnosis); all others classed as having type 2 diabetes. Diagnostic performance of the clinical criteria was assessed and other criteria explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: UK guidelines correctly classified 86% of participants. Most misclassifications occurred in patients classed as having type 1 diabetes who had significant endogenous insulin levels (57 out of 601; 9%); most in those diagnosed ≥35 years and treated with insulin from diagnosis, where 37 out of 66 (56%) were misclassified. Time to insulin and age at diagnosis performed best in predicting long-term endogenous insulin production (ROC AUC = 0.904 and 0.871); BMI was a less strong predictor of diabetes type (AUC = 0.824). CONCLUSION: Current UK guidelines provide a pragmatic clinical approach to classification reflecting long-term endogenous insulin production; caution is needed in older patients commencing insulin from diagnosis, where misclassification rates are increased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4838443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48384432016-05-02 Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis Hope, Suzy V Wienand-Barnett, Sophie Shepherd, Maggie King, Sophie M Fox, Charles Khunti, Kamlesh Oram, Richard A Knight, Bea A Hattersley, Andrew T Jones, Angus G Shields, Beverley M Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to ensuring appropriate management of patients, but can be challenging, especially when treating with insulin. The 2010 UK Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes were developed to help make the differentiation. AIM: To assess diagnostic accuracy of the UK guidelines against ‘gold standard’ definitions of type 1 and type 2 diabetes based on measured C-peptide levels. DESIGN AND SETTING: In total, 601 adults with insulin-treated diabetes and diabetes duration ≥5 years were recruited in Devon, Northamptonshire, and Leicestershire. METHOD: Baseline information and home urine sample were collected. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) measures endogenous insulin production. Gold standard type 1 diabetes was defined as continuous insulin treatment within 3 years of diagnosis and absolute insulin deficiency (UCPCR<0.2 nmol/mmol ≥5 years post-diagnosis); all others classed as having type 2 diabetes. Diagnostic performance of the clinical criteria was assessed and other criteria explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: UK guidelines correctly classified 86% of participants. Most misclassifications occurred in patients classed as having type 1 diabetes who had significant endogenous insulin levels (57 out of 601; 9%); most in those diagnosed ≥35 years and treated with insulin from diagnosis, where 37 out of 66 (56%) were misclassified. Time to insulin and age at diagnosis performed best in predicting long-term endogenous insulin production (ROC AUC = 0.904 and 0.871); BMI was a less strong predictor of diabetes type (AUC = 0.824). CONCLUSION: Current UK guidelines provide a pragmatic clinical approach to classification reflecting long-term endogenous insulin production; caution is needed in older patients commencing insulin from diagnosis, where misclassification rates are increased. Royal College of General Practitioners 2016-05 2016-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4838443/ /pubmed/27080317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684961 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2016 This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hope, Suzy V
Wienand-Barnett, Sophie
Shepherd, Maggie
King, Sophie M
Fox, Charles
Khunti, Kamlesh
Oram, Richard A
Knight, Bea A
Hattersley, Andrew T
Jones, Angus G
Shields, Beverley M
Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
title Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
title_full Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
title_fullStr Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
title_short Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
title_sort practical classification guidelines for diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684961
work_keys_str_mv AT hopesuzyv practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT wienandbarnettsophie practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT shepherdmaggie practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT kingsophiem practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT foxcharles practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT khuntikamlesh practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT oramricharda practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT knightbeaa practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT hattersleyandrewt practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT jonesangusg practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis
AT shieldsbeverleym practicalclassificationguidelinesfordiabetesinpatientstreatedwithinsulinacrosssectionalstudyoftheaccuracyofdiabetesdiagnosis