Cargando…

Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications

INTRODUCTION: In critically ill patients, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and ventilator-associated conditions (VACs) are associated with increased mortality, survivor morbidity and healthcare resource utilisation. Studies conclusively demonstrate that initial ventilator settings in patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuller, Brian M, Ferguson, Ian, Mohr, Nicholas M, Stephens, Robert J, Briscoe, Cristopher C, Kolomiets, Angelina A, Hotchkiss, Richard S, Kollef, Marin H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010991
_version_ 1782428020022181888
author Fuller, Brian M
Ferguson, Ian
Mohr, Nicholas M
Stephens, Robert J
Briscoe, Cristopher C
Kolomiets, Angelina A
Hotchkiss, Richard S
Kollef, Marin H
author_facet Fuller, Brian M
Ferguson, Ian
Mohr, Nicholas M
Stephens, Robert J
Briscoe, Cristopher C
Kolomiets, Angelina A
Hotchkiss, Richard S
Kollef, Marin H
author_sort Fuller, Brian M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In critically ill patients, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and ventilator-associated conditions (VACs) are associated with increased mortality, survivor morbidity and healthcare resource utilisation. Studies conclusively demonstrate that initial ventilator settings in patients with ARDS, and at risk for it, impact outcome. No studies have been conducted in the emergency department (ED) to determine if lung-protective ventilation in patients at risk for ARDS can reduce its incidence. Since the ED is the entry point to the intensive care unit for hundreds of thousands of mechanically ventilated patients annually in the USA, this represents a knowledge gap in this arena. A lung-protective ventilation strategy was instituted in our ED in 2014. It aims to address the parameters in need of quality improvement, as demonstrated by our previous research: (1) prevention of volutrauma; (2) appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure setting; (3) prevention of hyperoxia; and (4) aspiration precautions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED) trial is a single-centre, quasi-experimental before-after study testing the hypothesis that lung-protective ventilation, initiated in the ED, is associated with reduced pulmonary complications. An intervention cohort of 513 mechanically ventilated adult ED patients will be compared with over 1000 preintervention control patients. The primary outcome is a composite outcome of pulmonary complications after admission (ARDS and VACs). Multivariable logistic regression with propensity score adjustment will test the hypothesis that ED lung-protective ventilation decreases the incidence of pulmonary complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study was obtained prior to data collection on the first patient. As the study is a before-after observational study, examining the effect of treatment changes over time, it is being conducted with waiver of informed consent. This work will be disseminated by publication of full-length manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at major scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02543554.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4838728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48387282016-04-22 Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications Fuller, Brian M Ferguson, Ian Mohr, Nicholas M Stephens, Robert J Briscoe, Cristopher C Kolomiets, Angelina A Hotchkiss, Richard S Kollef, Marin H BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: In critically ill patients, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and ventilator-associated conditions (VACs) are associated with increased mortality, survivor morbidity and healthcare resource utilisation. Studies conclusively demonstrate that initial ventilator settings in patients with ARDS, and at risk for it, impact outcome. No studies have been conducted in the emergency department (ED) to determine if lung-protective ventilation in patients at risk for ARDS can reduce its incidence. Since the ED is the entry point to the intensive care unit for hundreds of thousands of mechanically ventilated patients annually in the USA, this represents a knowledge gap in this arena. A lung-protective ventilation strategy was instituted in our ED in 2014. It aims to address the parameters in need of quality improvement, as demonstrated by our previous research: (1) prevention of volutrauma; (2) appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure setting; (3) prevention of hyperoxia; and (4) aspiration precautions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED) trial is a single-centre, quasi-experimental before-after study testing the hypothesis that lung-protective ventilation, initiated in the ED, is associated with reduced pulmonary complications. An intervention cohort of 513 mechanically ventilated adult ED patients will be compared with over 1000 preintervention control patients. The primary outcome is a composite outcome of pulmonary complications after admission (ARDS and VACs). Multivariable logistic regression with propensity score adjustment will test the hypothesis that ED lung-protective ventilation decreases the incidence of pulmonary complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study was obtained prior to data collection on the first patient. As the study is a before-after observational study, examining the effect of treatment changes over time, it is being conducted with waiver of informed consent. This work will be disseminated by publication of full-length manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at major scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02543554. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4838728/ /pubmed/27067896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010991 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Fuller, Brian M
Ferguson, Ian
Mohr, Nicholas M
Stephens, Robert J
Briscoe, Cristopher C
Kolomiets, Angelina A
Hotchkiss, Richard S
Kollef, Marin H
Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications
title Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications
title_full Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications
title_fullStr Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications
title_full_unstemmed Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications
title_short Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications
title_sort lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (lov-ed): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010991
work_keys_str_mv AT fullerbrianm lungprotectiveventilationinitiatedintheemergencydepartmentlovedastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalbeforeaftertrialaimedatreducingpulmonarycomplications
AT fergusonian lungprotectiveventilationinitiatedintheemergencydepartmentlovedastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalbeforeaftertrialaimedatreducingpulmonarycomplications
AT mohrnicholasm lungprotectiveventilationinitiatedintheemergencydepartmentlovedastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalbeforeaftertrialaimedatreducingpulmonarycomplications
AT stephensrobertj lungprotectiveventilationinitiatedintheemergencydepartmentlovedastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalbeforeaftertrialaimedatreducingpulmonarycomplications
AT briscoecristopherc lungprotectiveventilationinitiatedintheemergencydepartmentlovedastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalbeforeaftertrialaimedatreducingpulmonarycomplications
AT kolomietsangelinaa lungprotectiveventilationinitiatedintheemergencydepartmentlovedastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalbeforeaftertrialaimedatreducingpulmonarycomplications
AT hotchkissrichards lungprotectiveventilationinitiatedintheemergencydepartmentlovedastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalbeforeaftertrialaimedatreducingpulmonarycomplications
AT kollefmarinh lungprotectiveventilationinitiatedintheemergencydepartmentlovedastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalbeforeaftertrialaimedatreducingpulmonarycomplications