Cargando…

Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem

Temporal differences in habitat use and foraging specialisms between ecomorphs represent aspects of behavioural phenotype that are poorly understood with regard to the origin and maintenance of ecological diversity. We tested the role of behaviour in resource use divergence of two Arctic charr (Salv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawley, Kate L., Rosten, Carolyn M., Christensen, Guttorm, Lucas, Martyn C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27098197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep24369
_version_ 1782428052874067968
author Hawley, Kate L.
Rosten, Carolyn M.
Christensen, Guttorm
Lucas, Martyn C.
author_facet Hawley, Kate L.
Rosten, Carolyn M.
Christensen, Guttorm
Lucas, Martyn C.
author_sort Hawley, Kate L.
collection PubMed
description Temporal differences in habitat use and foraging specialisms between ecomorphs represent aspects of behavioural phenotype that are poorly understood with regard to the origin and maintenance of ecological diversity. We tested the role of behaviour in resource use divergence of two Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) phenotypes, a slim, putatively pelagic-dwelling morph and a robust, putatively littoral-dwelling generalist morph, over an annual cycle, using biotelemetry and stable isotopes. Pelagic morph charr exhibited significantly greater δC(13) depletion, concordant with increased zooplanktivory, than for the Littoral morph. Although three-dimensional space-use of the morphs strongly overlapped, on average, the Littoral morph used that habitat 19.3% more than the Pelagic morph. Pelagic morph fish were significantly more active, further from the lake bed and at greater depth than Littoral fish (annual means respectively, Pelagic, 0.069BLs(−1), 8.21 m and 14.11 m; Littoral, 0.047BLs(−1), 5.87 m and 10.47 m). Patterns of habitat use differed between ecomorphs at key times, such as during autumn and at ice break, likely related to spawning and resumption of intensive foraging respectively. Extensive space-use overlap, but fine-scale differences in habitat use between charr ecomorphs, suggests the importance of competition for generating and maintaining polymorphism, and its potential for promoting reproductive isolation and evolution in sympatry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4838883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48388832016-04-27 Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem Hawley, Kate L. Rosten, Carolyn M. Christensen, Guttorm Lucas, Martyn C. Sci Rep Article Temporal differences in habitat use and foraging specialisms between ecomorphs represent aspects of behavioural phenotype that are poorly understood with regard to the origin and maintenance of ecological diversity. We tested the role of behaviour in resource use divergence of two Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) phenotypes, a slim, putatively pelagic-dwelling morph and a robust, putatively littoral-dwelling generalist morph, over an annual cycle, using biotelemetry and stable isotopes. Pelagic morph charr exhibited significantly greater δC(13) depletion, concordant with increased zooplanktivory, than for the Littoral morph. Although three-dimensional space-use of the morphs strongly overlapped, on average, the Littoral morph used that habitat 19.3% more than the Pelagic morph. Pelagic morph fish were significantly more active, further from the lake bed and at greater depth than Littoral fish (annual means respectively, Pelagic, 0.069BLs(−1), 8.21 m and 14.11 m; Littoral, 0.047BLs(−1), 5.87 m and 10.47 m). Patterns of habitat use differed between ecomorphs at key times, such as during autumn and at ice break, likely related to spawning and resumption of intensive foraging respectively. Extensive space-use overlap, but fine-scale differences in habitat use between charr ecomorphs, suggests the importance of competition for generating and maintaining polymorphism, and its potential for promoting reproductive isolation and evolution in sympatry. Nature Publishing Group 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4838883/ /pubmed/27098197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep24369 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Hawley, Kate L.
Rosten, Carolyn M.
Christensen, Guttorm
Lucas, Martyn C.
Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem
title Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem
title_full Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem
title_fullStr Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem
title_full_unstemmed Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem
title_short Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem
title_sort fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27098197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep24369
work_keys_str_mv AT hawleykatel finescalebehaviouraldifferencesdistinguishresourceusebyecomorphsinaclosedecosystem
AT rostencarolynm finescalebehaviouraldifferencesdistinguishresourceusebyecomorphsinaclosedecosystem
AT christensenguttorm finescalebehaviouraldifferencesdistinguishresourceusebyecomorphsinaclosedecosystem
AT lucasmartync finescalebehaviouraldifferencesdistinguishresourceusebyecomorphsinaclosedecosystem