Cargando…

Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone

BACKGROUND: Primary stability after implant placement is essential for osseointegration. It is important to understand the bone/implant interface for analyzing the influence of implant design on primary stability. In this study rigid polyurethane foam is used as artificial bone to evaluate the bone–...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamaguchi, Yoko, Shiota, Makoto, FuJii, Masaki, Sekiya, Michi, Ozeki, Masahiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2116-6
_version_ 1782428075225513984
author Yamaguchi, Yoko
Shiota, Makoto
FuJii, Masaki
Sekiya, Michi
Ozeki, Masahiko
author_facet Yamaguchi, Yoko
Shiota, Makoto
FuJii, Masaki
Sekiya, Michi
Ozeki, Masahiko
author_sort Yamaguchi, Yoko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary stability after implant placement is essential for osseointegration. It is important to understand the bone/implant interface for analyzing the influence of implant design on primary stability. In this study rigid polyurethane foam is used as artificial bone to evaluate the bone–implant interface and to identify where the torque is being generated during placement. METHODS: Five implant systems—Straumann-Standard (ST), Straumann-Bone Level (BL), Straumann-Tapered Effect (TE), Nobel Biocare-Brånemark MKIII (MK3), and Nobel Biocare-Brånemark MKIV (MK4)—were used for this experiment. Artificial bone blocks were prepared and the implant was installed. After placement, a metal jig and one side artificial bone block were removed and then the implant embedded in the artificial bone was exposed for observing the bone–implant interface. A digital micro-analyzer was used for observing the contact interface. RESULTS: The insertion torque values were 39.35, 23.78, 12.53, 26.35, and 17.79 N cm for MK4, BL, ST, TE, and MK3, respectively. In ST, MK3, TE, MK4, and BL the white layer areas were 61 × 103 μm(2), 37 × 103 μm(2), 103 × 103 μm(2) in the tapered portion and 84 × 03 μm(2) in the parallel portion, 134 × 103 μm(2), and 98 × 103 μm(2) in the tapered portion and 87 × 103 μm(2) in the parallel portion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The direct observation method of the implant/artificial bone interface is a simple and useful method that enables the identification of the area where implant retention occurs. A white layer at the site of stress concentration during implant placement was identified and the magnitude of the stress was quantitatively estimated. The site where the highest torque occurred was the area from the thread crest to the thread root and the under and lateral aspect of the platform. The artificial bone debris created by the self-tapping blade accumulated in both the cutting chamber and in the space between the threads and artificial bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4839028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48390282016-05-16 Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone Yamaguchi, Yoko Shiota, Makoto FuJii, Masaki Sekiya, Michi Ozeki, Masahiko Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: Primary stability after implant placement is essential for osseointegration. It is important to understand the bone/implant interface for analyzing the influence of implant design on primary stability. In this study rigid polyurethane foam is used as artificial bone to evaluate the bone–implant interface and to identify where the torque is being generated during placement. METHODS: Five implant systems—Straumann-Standard (ST), Straumann-Bone Level (BL), Straumann-Tapered Effect (TE), Nobel Biocare-Brånemark MKIII (MK3), and Nobel Biocare-Brånemark MKIV (MK4)—were used for this experiment. Artificial bone blocks were prepared and the implant was installed. After placement, a metal jig and one side artificial bone block were removed and then the implant embedded in the artificial bone was exposed for observing the bone–implant interface. A digital micro-analyzer was used for observing the contact interface. RESULTS: The insertion torque values were 39.35, 23.78, 12.53, 26.35, and 17.79 N cm for MK4, BL, ST, TE, and MK3, respectively. In ST, MK3, TE, MK4, and BL the white layer areas were 61 × 103 μm(2), 37 × 103 μm(2), 103 × 103 μm(2) in the tapered portion and 84 × 03 μm(2) in the parallel portion, 134 × 103 μm(2), and 98 × 103 μm(2) in the tapered portion and 87 × 103 μm(2) in the parallel portion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The direct observation method of the implant/artificial bone interface is a simple and useful method that enables the identification of the area where implant retention occurs. A white layer at the site of stress concentration during implant placement was identified and the magnitude of the stress was quantitatively estimated. The site where the highest torque occurred was the area from the thread crest to the thread root and the under and lateral aspect of the platform. The artificial bone debris created by the self-tapping blade accumulated in both the cutting chamber and in the space between the threads and artificial bone. Springer International Publishing 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4839028/ /pubmed/27186458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2116-6 Text en © Yamaguchi et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Yamaguchi, Yoko
Shiota, Makoto
FuJii, Masaki
Sekiya, Michi
Ozeki, Masahiko
Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone
title Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone
title_full Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone
title_fullStr Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone
title_full_unstemmed Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone
title_short Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone
title_sort development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2116-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yamaguchiyoko developmentandapplicationofadirectmethodtoobservetheimplantboneinterfaceusingsimulatedbone
AT shiotamakoto developmentandapplicationofadirectmethodtoobservetheimplantboneinterfaceusingsimulatedbone
AT fujiimasaki developmentandapplicationofadirectmethodtoobservetheimplantboneinterfaceusingsimulatedbone
AT sekiyamichi developmentandapplicationofadirectmethodtoobservetheimplantboneinterfaceusingsimulatedbone
AT ozekimasahiko developmentandapplicationofadirectmethodtoobservetheimplantboneinterfaceusingsimulatedbone