Cargando…

Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: In-hospital progressive resistance training (PRT) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitation following hip surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether a home-based PRT program would be beneficial in improving patients’ muscle strength and physical function compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okoro, Tosan, Whitaker, Rhiannon, Gardner, Andrew, Maddison, Peter, Andrew, John G., Lemmey, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27097833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x
_version_ 1782428090472857600
author Okoro, Tosan
Whitaker, Rhiannon
Gardner, Andrew
Maddison, Peter
Andrew, John G.
Lemmey, Andrew
author_facet Okoro, Tosan
Whitaker, Rhiannon
Gardner, Andrew
Maddison, Peter
Andrew, John G.
Lemmey, Andrew
author_sort Okoro, Tosan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-hospital progressive resistance training (PRT) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitation following hip surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether a home-based PRT program would be beneficial in improving patients’ muscle strength and physical function compared to standard rehabilitation. METHODS: Subjects (n = 49) either received home-based PRT rehabilitation (n = 25) or standard rehabilitation (n = 24) in a prospective single blinded randomized trial carried out over a two-year period. The primary outcome measure was the maximal voluntary contraction of the operated leg quadriceps (MVCOLQ) with secondary measures of outcome being the sit to stand score (ST), timed up and go (TUG), stair climb performance (SCP), the 6 min walk test (6MWT), and lean mass of the operated leg (LM). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients completed follow up at 1 year (n = 13 per group) for the final comparative analysis. All the outcome measures showed marked progressive improvements from the baseline measures at 9–12 months post op (Estimated effect (std error); p value)- MVCOLQ 26.50 (8.71) N p = 0.001; ST 1.37 (0.33) p = 0.0001; TUG −1.44 (0.45) s p =0.0001; SCP −3.41(0.80)s p = 0.0001; 6MWT 45.61 (6.10)m p = 0.0001; LM 20 (204)g p = 0.326) following surgery for both groups. Overall, there was no significant effect for participation in the exercise regime compared with standard care for all outcomes assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the two groups for participation in the home-based PRT exercise programme when compared to standard care for all outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 1309951. Registered February 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4839095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48390952016-04-22 Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study Okoro, Tosan Whitaker, Rhiannon Gardner, Andrew Maddison, Peter Andrew, John G. Lemmey, Andrew BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In-hospital progressive resistance training (PRT) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitation following hip surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether a home-based PRT program would be beneficial in improving patients’ muscle strength and physical function compared to standard rehabilitation. METHODS: Subjects (n = 49) either received home-based PRT rehabilitation (n = 25) or standard rehabilitation (n = 24) in a prospective single blinded randomized trial carried out over a two-year period. The primary outcome measure was the maximal voluntary contraction of the operated leg quadriceps (MVCOLQ) with secondary measures of outcome being the sit to stand score (ST), timed up and go (TUG), stair climb performance (SCP), the 6 min walk test (6MWT), and lean mass of the operated leg (LM). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients completed follow up at 1 year (n = 13 per group) for the final comparative analysis. All the outcome measures showed marked progressive improvements from the baseline measures at 9–12 months post op (Estimated effect (std error); p value)- MVCOLQ 26.50 (8.71) N p = 0.001; ST 1.37 (0.33) p = 0.0001; TUG −1.44 (0.45) s p =0.0001; SCP −3.41(0.80)s p = 0.0001; 6MWT 45.61 (6.10)m p = 0.0001; LM 20 (204)g p = 0.326) following surgery for both groups. Overall, there was no significant effect for participation in the exercise regime compared with standard care for all outcomes assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the two groups for participation in the home-based PRT exercise programme when compared to standard care for all outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 1309951. Registered February 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4839095/ /pubmed/27097833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x Text en © Okoro et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Okoro, Tosan
Whitaker, Rhiannon
Gardner, Andrew
Maddison, Peter
Andrew, John G.
Lemmey, Andrew
Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study
title Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study
title_full Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study
title_short Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study
title_sort does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? results of a randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27097833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x
work_keys_str_mv AT okorotosan doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT whitakerrhiannon doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT gardnerandrew doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT maddisonpeter doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT andrewjohng doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lemmeyandrew doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy