Cargando…
Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND: In-hospital progressive resistance training (PRT) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitation following hip surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether a home-based PRT program would be beneficial in improving patients’ muscle strength and physical function compar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27097833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x |
_version_ | 1782428090472857600 |
---|---|
author | Okoro, Tosan Whitaker, Rhiannon Gardner, Andrew Maddison, Peter Andrew, John G. Lemmey, Andrew |
author_facet | Okoro, Tosan Whitaker, Rhiannon Gardner, Andrew Maddison, Peter Andrew, John G. Lemmey, Andrew |
author_sort | Okoro, Tosan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In-hospital progressive resistance training (PRT) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitation following hip surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether a home-based PRT program would be beneficial in improving patients’ muscle strength and physical function compared to standard rehabilitation. METHODS: Subjects (n = 49) either received home-based PRT rehabilitation (n = 25) or standard rehabilitation (n = 24) in a prospective single blinded randomized trial carried out over a two-year period. The primary outcome measure was the maximal voluntary contraction of the operated leg quadriceps (MVCOLQ) with secondary measures of outcome being the sit to stand score (ST), timed up and go (TUG), stair climb performance (SCP), the 6 min walk test (6MWT), and lean mass of the operated leg (LM). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients completed follow up at 1 year (n = 13 per group) for the final comparative analysis. All the outcome measures showed marked progressive improvements from the baseline measures at 9–12 months post op (Estimated effect (std error); p value)- MVCOLQ 26.50 (8.71) N p = 0.001; ST 1.37 (0.33) p = 0.0001; TUG −1.44 (0.45) s p =0.0001; SCP −3.41(0.80)s p = 0.0001; 6MWT 45.61 (6.10)m p = 0.0001; LM 20 (204)g p = 0.326) following surgery for both groups. Overall, there was no significant effect for participation in the exercise regime compared with standard care for all outcomes assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the two groups for participation in the home-based PRT exercise programme when compared to standard care for all outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 1309951. Registered February 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4839095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48390952016-04-22 Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study Okoro, Tosan Whitaker, Rhiannon Gardner, Andrew Maddison, Peter Andrew, John G. Lemmey, Andrew BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In-hospital progressive resistance training (PRT) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitation following hip surgery. The aim of this study was to assess whether a home-based PRT program would be beneficial in improving patients’ muscle strength and physical function compared to standard rehabilitation. METHODS: Subjects (n = 49) either received home-based PRT rehabilitation (n = 25) or standard rehabilitation (n = 24) in a prospective single blinded randomized trial carried out over a two-year period. The primary outcome measure was the maximal voluntary contraction of the operated leg quadriceps (MVCOLQ) with secondary measures of outcome being the sit to stand score (ST), timed up and go (TUG), stair climb performance (SCP), the 6 min walk test (6MWT), and lean mass of the operated leg (LM). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients completed follow up at 1 year (n = 13 per group) for the final comparative analysis. All the outcome measures showed marked progressive improvements from the baseline measures at 9–12 months post op (Estimated effect (std error); p value)- MVCOLQ 26.50 (8.71) N p = 0.001; ST 1.37 (0.33) p = 0.0001; TUG −1.44 (0.45) s p =0.0001; SCP −3.41(0.80)s p = 0.0001; 6MWT 45.61 (6.10)m p = 0.0001; LM 20 (204)g p = 0.326) following surgery for both groups. Overall, there was no significant effect for participation in the exercise regime compared with standard care for all outcomes assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the two groups for participation in the home-based PRT exercise programme when compared to standard care for all outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 1309951. Registered February 2011. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4839095/ /pubmed/27097833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x Text en © Okoro et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Okoro, Tosan Whitaker, Rhiannon Gardner, Andrew Maddison, Peter Andrew, John G. Lemmey, Andrew Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study |
title | Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study |
title_full | Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study |
title_short | Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study |
title_sort | does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? results of a randomized controlled study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27097833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1023-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okorotosan doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT whitakerrhiannon doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT gardnerandrew doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT maddisonpeter doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT andrewjohng doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT lemmeyandrew doesanearlyhomebasedprogressiveresistancetrainingprogramimprovefunctionfollowingtotalhipreplacementresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy |