Cargando…
Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands
BACKGROUND: The death of a child is an enormous tragedy for both the family and others involved. A child’s death appeals to everyone’s responsibility to take measures to prevent similar deaths in the future. Child Death Review (CDR) is an interagency approach in which a child’s death is systematical...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x |
_version_ | 1782428098573107200 |
---|---|
author | Gijzen, Sandra L’Hoir, Monique P. Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M. Need, Ariana |
author_facet | Gijzen, Sandra L’Hoir, Monique P. Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M. Need, Ariana |
author_sort | Gijzen, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The death of a child is an enormous tragedy for both the family and others involved. A child’s death appeals to everyone’s responsibility to take measures to prevent similar deaths in the future. Child Death Review (CDR) is an interagency approach in which a child’s death is systematically analyzed by a multidisciplinary team. The aim of CDR is to identify avoidable factors that give direction to prevention and to improve death statistics. CDR is not yet implemented in the Netherlands. The purpose of this study is to determine Dutch stakeholders’ opinions regarding the facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of CDR in the Netherlands. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted: three with professionals who are involved in children’s deaths and one with parents who have lost a child under the age of 2 years. The recorded discussions were transcribed and analyzed using Atlas ti. The facilitating and impeding factors were measured using the measurement instrument for determinants of innovations (MIDI). The MIDI identifies facilitating and impeding determinants associated with the innovation, user, organization and social-political context. RESULTS: Improvement of the quality of (health) care and obtaining a clear explanation for the child’s death (user and innovation) were identified as benefits of CDR. The emotional burden for professionals and parents and the time implications were considered to be drawbacks of CDR (user and innovation). The multidisciplinary approach (innovation), parental consent and the use of anonimyzed data (user) were considered as facilitators to implementation. Insufficient information (innovation), potential legal consequences for professionals and organizations (user), insufficient ratification by organizations (organization) and confidentiality (social-political context) were identified as impeding implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The determinants identified as facilitating and the recommendations provided to overcome the barriers can be used as input for the strategy for implementation of CDR. A pilot study is necessary to determine to what extent the chosen implementation strategy is effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4839131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48391312016-04-22 Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands Gijzen, Sandra L’Hoir, Monique P. Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M. Need, Ariana BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: The death of a child is an enormous tragedy for both the family and others involved. A child’s death appeals to everyone’s responsibility to take measures to prevent similar deaths in the future. Child Death Review (CDR) is an interagency approach in which a child’s death is systematically analyzed by a multidisciplinary team. The aim of CDR is to identify avoidable factors that give direction to prevention and to improve death statistics. CDR is not yet implemented in the Netherlands. The purpose of this study is to determine Dutch stakeholders’ opinions regarding the facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of CDR in the Netherlands. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted: three with professionals who are involved in children’s deaths and one with parents who have lost a child under the age of 2 years. The recorded discussions were transcribed and analyzed using Atlas ti. The facilitating and impeding factors were measured using the measurement instrument for determinants of innovations (MIDI). The MIDI identifies facilitating and impeding determinants associated with the innovation, user, organization and social-political context. RESULTS: Improvement of the quality of (health) care and obtaining a clear explanation for the child’s death (user and innovation) were identified as benefits of CDR. The emotional burden for professionals and parents and the time implications were considered to be drawbacks of CDR (user and innovation). The multidisciplinary approach (innovation), parental consent and the use of anonimyzed data (user) were considered as facilitators to implementation. Insufficient information (innovation), potential legal consequences for professionals and organizations (user), insufficient ratification by organizations (organization) and confidentiality (social-political context) were identified as impeding implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The determinants identified as facilitating and the recommendations provided to overcome the barriers can be used as input for the strategy for implementation of CDR. A pilot study is necessary to determine to what extent the chosen implementation strategy is effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4839131/ /pubmed/27099152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x Text en © Gijzen et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gijzen, Sandra L’Hoir, Monique P. Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M. Need, Ariana Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands |
title | Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands |
title_full | Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands |
title_short | Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands |
title_sort | stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of child death review in the netherlands |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gijzensandra stakeholdersopinionsontheimplementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlands AT lhoirmoniquep stakeholdersopinionsontheimplementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlands AT boereboonekampmagdam stakeholdersopinionsontheimplementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlands AT needariana stakeholdersopinionsontheimplementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlands |