Cargando…

Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The death of a child is an enormous tragedy for both the family and others involved. A child’s death appeals to everyone’s responsibility to take measures to prevent similar deaths in the future. Child Death Review (CDR) is an interagency approach in which a child’s death is systematical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gijzen, Sandra, L’Hoir, Monique P., Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M., Need, Ariana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x
_version_ 1782428098573107200
author Gijzen, Sandra
L’Hoir, Monique P.
Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.
Need, Ariana
author_facet Gijzen, Sandra
L’Hoir, Monique P.
Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.
Need, Ariana
author_sort Gijzen, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The death of a child is an enormous tragedy for both the family and others involved. A child’s death appeals to everyone’s responsibility to take measures to prevent similar deaths in the future. Child Death Review (CDR) is an interagency approach in which a child’s death is systematically analyzed by a multidisciplinary team. The aim of CDR is to identify avoidable factors that give direction to prevention and to improve death statistics. CDR is not yet implemented in the Netherlands. The purpose of this study is to determine Dutch stakeholders’ opinions regarding the facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of CDR in the Netherlands. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted: three with professionals who are involved in children’s deaths and one with parents who have lost a child under the age of 2 years. The recorded discussions were transcribed and analyzed using Atlas ti. The facilitating and impeding factors were measured using the measurement instrument for determinants of innovations (MIDI). The MIDI identifies facilitating and impeding determinants associated with the innovation, user, organization and social-political context. RESULTS: Improvement of the quality of (health) care and obtaining a clear explanation for the child’s death (user and innovation) were identified as benefits of CDR. The emotional burden for professionals and parents and the time implications were considered to be drawbacks of CDR (user and innovation). The multidisciplinary approach (innovation), parental consent and the use of anonimyzed data (user) were considered as facilitators to implementation. Insufficient information (innovation), potential legal consequences for professionals and organizations (user), insufficient ratification by organizations (organization) and confidentiality (social-political context) were identified as impeding implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The determinants identified as facilitating and the recommendations provided to overcome the barriers can be used as input for the strategy for implementation of CDR. A pilot study is necessary to determine to what extent the chosen implementation strategy is effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4839131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48391312016-04-22 Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands Gijzen, Sandra L’Hoir, Monique P. Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M. Need, Ariana BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: The death of a child is an enormous tragedy for both the family and others involved. A child’s death appeals to everyone’s responsibility to take measures to prevent similar deaths in the future. Child Death Review (CDR) is an interagency approach in which a child’s death is systematically analyzed by a multidisciplinary team. The aim of CDR is to identify avoidable factors that give direction to prevention and to improve death statistics. CDR is not yet implemented in the Netherlands. The purpose of this study is to determine Dutch stakeholders’ opinions regarding the facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of CDR in the Netherlands. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted: three with professionals who are involved in children’s deaths and one with parents who have lost a child under the age of 2 years. The recorded discussions were transcribed and analyzed using Atlas ti. The facilitating and impeding factors were measured using the measurement instrument for determinants of innovations (MIDI). The MIDI identifies facilitating and impeding determinants associated with the innovation, user, organization and social-political context. RESULTS: Improvement of the quality of (health) care and obtaining a clear explanation for the child’s death (user and innovation) were identified as benefits of CDR. The emotional burden for professionals and parents and the time implications were considered to be drawbacks of CDR (user and innovation). The multidisciplinary approach (innovation), parental consent and the use of anonimyzed data (user) were considered as facilitators to implementation. Insufficient information (innovation), potential legal consequences for professionals and organizations (user), insufficient ratification by organizations (organization) and confidentiality (social-political context) were identified as impeding implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The determinants identified as facilitating and the recommendations provided to overcome the barriers can be used as input for the strategy for implementation of CDR. A pilot study is necessary to determine to what extent the chosen implementation strategy is effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4839131/ /pubmed/27099152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x Text en © Gijzen et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gijzen, Sandra
L’Hoir, Monique P.
Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.
Need, Ariana
Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands
title Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands
title_full Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands
title_short Stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands
title_sort stakeholders’ opinions on the implementation of child death review in the netherlands
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1966-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gijzensandra stakeholdersopinionsontheimplementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlands
AT lhoirmoniquep stakeholdersopinionsontheimplementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlands
AT boereboonekampmagdam stakeholdersopinionsontheimplementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlands
AT needariana stakeholdersopinionsontheimplementationofchilddeathreviewinthenetherlands