Cargando…
Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Decision aids have been overall successful in improving the quality of health decision making. However, it is unclear whether the impact of the results of using decision aids also apply to older people (aged 65+). We sought to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27098100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0281-8 |
_version_ | 1782428102452838400 |
---|---|
author | van Weert, Julia C. M. van Munster, Barbara C. Sanders, Remco Spijker, René Hooft, Lotty Jansen, Jesse |
author_facet | van Weert, Julia C. M. van Munster, Barbara C. Sanders, Remco Spijker, René Hooft, Lotty Jansen, Jesse |
author_sort | van Weert, Julia C. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Decision aids have been overall successful in improving the quality of health decision making. However, it is unclear whether the impact of the results of using decision aids also apply to older people (aged 65+). We sought to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) evaluating the efficacy of decision aids as compared to usual care or alternative intervention(s) for older adults facing treatment, screening or care decisions. METHODS: A systematic search of (1) a Cochrane review of decision aids and (2) MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane library central registry of studies and Cinahl. We included published RCTs/CCTs of interventions designed to improve shared decision making (SDM) by older adults (aged 65+) and RCTs/CCTs that analysed the effect of the intervention in a subgroup with a mean age of 65+. Based on the International Patient Decision aid Standards (IPDAS), the primary outcomes were attributes of the decision and the decision process. Other behavioral, health, and health system effects were considered as secondary outcomes. If data could be pooled, a meta-analysis was conducted. Data for which meta-analysis was not possible were synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 11,034 references. After abstract and full text screening, 22 papers were included. Decision aids performed better than control resp. usual care interventions by increasing knowledge and accurate risk perception in older people (decision attributes). With regard to decision process attributes, decision aids resulted in lower decisional conflict and more patient participation. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows promising results on the effectiveness of decision aids for older adults. Decision aids improve older adults’ knowledge, increase their risk perception, decrease decisional conflict and seem to enhance participation in SDM. It must however be noted that the body of literature on the effectiveness of decision aids for older adults is still in its infancy. Only one decision aid was specifically developed for older adults, and the mean age in most studies was between 65 and 70, indicating that the oldest-old were not included. Future research should expand on the design, application and evaluation of decision aids for older, more vulnerable adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0281-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4839148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48391482016-04-22 Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis van Weert, Julia C. M. van Munster, Barbara C. Sanders, Remco Spijker, René Hooft, Lotty Jansen, Jesse BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Decision aids have been overall successful in improving the quality of health decision making. However, it is unclear whether the impact of the results of using decision aids also apply to older people (aged 65+). We sought to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) evaluating the efficacy of decision aids as compared to usual care or alternative intervention(s) for older adults facing treatment, screening or care decisions. METHODS: A systematic search of (1) a Cochrane review of decision aids and (2) MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane library central registry of studies and Cinahl. We included published RCTs/CCTs of interventions designed to improve shared decision making (SDM) by older adults (aged 65+) and RCTs/CCTs that analysed the effect of the intervention in a subgroup with a mean age of 65+. Based on the International Patient Decision aid Standards (IPDAS), the primary outcomes were attributes of the decision and the decision process. Other behavioral, health, and health system effects were considered as secondary outcomes. If data could be pooled, a meta-analysis was conducted. Data for which meta-analysis was not possible were synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 11,034 references. After abstract and full text screening, 22 papers were included. Decision aids performed better than control resp. usual care interventions by increasing knowledge and accurate risk perception in older people (decision attributes). With regard to decision process attributes, decision aids resulted in lower decisional conflict and more patient participation. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows promising results on the effectiveness of decision aids for older adults. Decision aids improve older adults’ knowledge, increase their risk perception, decrease decisional conflict and seem to enhance participation in SDM. It must however be noted that the body of literature on the effectiveness of decision aids for older adults is still in its infancy. Only one decision aid was specifically developed for older adults, and the mean age in most studies was between 65 and 70, indicating that the oldest-old were not included. Future research should expand on the design, application and evaluation of decision aids for older, more vulnerable adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0281-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4839148/ /pubmed/27098100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0281-8 Text en © van Weert et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Weert, Julia C. M. van Munster, Barbara C. Sanders, Remco Spijker, René Hooft, Lotty Jansen, Jesse Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27098100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0281-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanweertjuliacm decisionaidstohelpolderpeoplemakehealthdecisionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanmunsterbarbarac decisionaidstohelpolderpeoplemakehealthdecisionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sandersremco decisionaidstohelpolderpeoplemakehealthdecisionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT spijkerrene decisionaidstohelpolderpeoplemakehealthdecisionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hooftlotty decisionaidstohelpolderpeoplemakehealthdecisionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jansenjesse decisionaidstohelpolderpeoplemakehealthdecisionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |