Cargando…

A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience

AIMS: A prospective study to compare the outcomes of lingual versus buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in patients with long segment anterior urethral strictures disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 30 patients for buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (group I) and 30 patients for lingua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pal, Dilip Kumar, Gupta, Depak Kumar, Ghosh, Bastab, Bera, Malay Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27141184
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.172214
_version_ 1782428114399264768
author Pal, Dilip Kumar
Gupta, Depak Kumar
Ghosh, Bastab
Bera, Malay Kumar
author_facet Pal, Dilip Kumar
Gupta, Depak Kumar
Ghosh, Bastab
Bera, Malay Kumar
author_sort Pal, Dilip Kumar
collection PubMed
description AIMS: A prospective study to compare the outcomes of lingual versus buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in patients with long segment anterior urethral strictures disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 30 patients for buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (group I) and 30 patients for lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty (group II) for treatment of long segment (>3 cm) incomplete anterior urethral stricture disease using single-stage dorsal onlay free oral mucosal graft urethroplasty by Barbagli's technique between February 2013 to September 2014. All patients underwent complete evaluation of the stricture including inspection of the oral cavity. RESULTS: The results of urethroplasty in between two group were not significant (P > 0.05) in terms of Qmax (P = 0.63), mean postoperative AUA symptom score (P = 0.83), operative time (P = 0.302) intra operative blood loss (P = 0.708), duration of postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.83), but slurring of speech complications was seen in group II, but not in group I. Long-term complications of salivary disturbance, tightness of the mouth, persistent pain at graft site, perioral numbness, seen only in group I (BMGU). CONCLUSION: LMG urethroplasty is an excellent alternative to BMG urethroplasty with comparable results of urethroplasty and minimal donor site complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4839231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48392312016-05-02 A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience Pal, Dilip Kumar Gupta, Depak Kumar Ghosh, Bastab Bera, Malay Kumar Urol Ann Original Article AIMS: A prospective study to compare the outcomes of lingual versus buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in patients with long segment anterior urethral strictures disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 30 patients for buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (group I) and 30 patients for lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty (group II) for treatment of long segment (>3 cm) incomplete anterior urethral stricture disease using single-stage dorsal onlay free oral mucosal graft urethroplasty by Barbagli's technique between February 2013 to September 2014. All patients underwent complete evaluation of the stricture including inspection of the oral cavity. RESULTS: The results of urethroplasty in between two group were not significant (P > 0.05) in terms of Qmax (P = 0.63), mean postoperative AUA symptom score (P = 0.83), operative time (P = 0.302) intra operative blood loss (P = 0.708), duration of postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.83), but slurring of speech complications was seen in group II, but not in group I. Long-term complications of salivary disturbance, tightness of the mouth, persistent pain at graft site, perioral numbness, seen only in group I (BMGU). CONCLUSION: LMG urethroplasty is an excellent alternative to BMG urethroplasty with comparable results of urethroplasty and minimal donor site complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4839231/ /pubmed/27141184 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.172214 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pal, Dilip Kumar
Gupta, Depak Kumar
Ghosh, Bastab
Bera, Malay Kumar
A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_full A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_fullStr A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_short A comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: An institutional experience
title_sort comparative study of lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in urethral stricture disease: an institutional experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27141184
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.172214
work_keys_str_mv AT paldilipkumar acomparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT guptadepakkumar acomparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT ghoshbastab acomparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT beramalaykumar acomparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT paldilipkumar comparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT guptadepakkumar comparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT ghoshbastab comparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience
AT beramalaykumar comparativestudyoflingualmucosalgrafturethroplastywithbuccalmucosalgrafturethroplastyinurethralstricturediseaseaninstitutionalexperience