Cargando…

Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stav, Anatoli, Reytman, Leonid, Stav, Michael-Yohay, Portnoy, Isaak, Kantarovsky, Alexander, Galili, Offer, Luboshitz, Shmuel, Sevi, Roger, Sternberg, Ahud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Rambam Health Care Campus 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27101216
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10240
_version_ 1782428133732909056
author Stav, Anatoli
Reytman, Leonid
Stav, Michael-Yohay
Portnoy, Isaak
Kantarovsky, Alexander
Galili, Offer
Luboshitz, Shmuel
Sevi, Roger
Sternberg, Ahud
author_facet Stav, Anatoli
Reytman, Leonid
Stav, Michael-Yohay
Portnoy, Isaak
Kantarovsky, Alexander
Galili, Offer
Luboshitz, Shmuel
Sevi, Roger
Sternberg, Ahud
author_sort Stav, Anatoli
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves will be blocked separately because they are not a part of the brachial plexus. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. The three approaches of the US-guided BPB without neurostimulation were compared for quality, performance time, and correlation between performance time and BMI. Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerve blocks were used in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were randomized into three groups: SCL (supraclavicular), ICL (infraclavicular), and AX (axillary). Seven patients were excluded due to various factors. All three groups were similar in demographic data, M:F proportion, preoperative diagnosis and type of surgery, anesthesiologists who performed the block, and surgical staff that performed the surgical intervention. The time between the end of the block performance and the start of the operation was also similar. The quality of the surgical anesthesia and discomfort during the operation were identical following comparison between groups. No direct positive correlation was observed between BMI and the block performance time. The time for the axillary block was slightly longer than the time for the supra- and infraclavicular approaches, but it had no practical clinical significance. Transient Horner syndrome was observed in three patients in the SCL group. No other adverse effects or complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: All three approaches can be used for US-guided BPB with similar quality of surgical anesthesia for operations of below the shoulder. A block of the intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves is recommended. Obesity is not a significant factor in relation to the time of US-guided BPB performance, or the quality of surgical anesthesia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01442558.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4839540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Rambam Health Care Campus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48395402016-05-19 Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia Stav, Anatoli Reytman, Leonid Stav, Michael-Yohay Portnoy, Isaak Kantarovsky, Alexander Galili, Offer Luboshitz, Shmuel Sevi, Roger Sternberg, Ahud Rambam Maimonides Med J Original Research OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves will be blocked separately because they are not a part of the brachial plexus. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. The three approaches of the US-guided BPB without neurostimulation were compared for quality, performance time, and correlation between performance time and BMI. Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerve blocks were used in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were randomized into three groups: SCL (supraclavicular), ICL (infraclavicular), and AX (axillary). Seven patients were excluded due to various factors. All three groups were similar in demographic data, M:F proportion, preoperative diagnosis and type of surgery, anesthesiologists who performed the block, and surgical staff that performed the surgical intervention. The time between the end of the block performance and the start of the operation was also similar. The quality of the surgical anesthesia and discomfort during the operation were identical following comparison between groups. No direct positive correlation was observed between BMI and the block performance time. The time for the axillary block was slightly longer than the time for the supra- and infraclavicular approaches, but it had no practical clinical significance. Transient Horner syndrome was observed in three patients in the SCL group. No other adverse effects or complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: All three approaches can be used for US-guided BPB with similar quality of surgical anesthesia for operations of below the shoulder. A block of the intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves is recommended. Obesity is not a significant factor in relation to the time of US-guided BPB performance, or the quality of surgical anesthesia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01442558.) Rambam Health Care Campus 2016-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4839540/ /pubmed/27101216 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10240 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Stav et al This is an open-access article. All its content, except where otherwise noted, is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Stav, Anatoli
Reytman, Leonid
Stav, Michael-Yohay
Portnoy, Isaak
Kantarovsky, Alexander
Galili, Offer
Luboshitz, Shmuel
Sevi, Roger
Sternberg, Ahud
Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_full Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_short Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_sort comparison of the supraclavicular, infraclavicular and axillary approaches for ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block for surgical anesthesia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27101216
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10240
work_keys_str_mv AT stavanatoli comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT reytmanleonid comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT stavmichaelyohay comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT portnoyisaak comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT kantarovskyalexander comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT galilioffer comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT luboshitzshmuel comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT seviroger comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT sternbergahud comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia