Cargando…

Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance

Cotton has lost many ancestral defensive traits against key invertebrate pests. This is suggested by the levels of resistance to some pests found in wild cotton genotypes as well as in cultivated landraces and is a result of domestication and a long history of targeted breeding for yield and fiber q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trapero, Carlos, Wilson, Iain W., Stiller, Warwick N., Wilson, Lewis J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4840675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00500
_version_ 1782428300930449408
author Trapero, Carlos
Wilson, Iain W.
Stiller, Warwick N.
Wilson, Lewis J.
author_facet Trapero, Carlos
Wilson, Iain W.
Stiller, Warwick N.
Wilson, Lewis J.
author_sort Trapero, Carlos
collection PubMed
description Cotton has lost many ancestral defensive traits against key invertebrate pests. This is suggested by the levels of resistance to some pests found in wild cotton genotypes as well as in cultivated landraces and is a result of domestication and a long history of targeted breeding for yield and fiber quality, along with the capacity to control pests with pesticides. Genetic modification (GM) allowed integration of toxins from a bacteria into cotton to control key Lepidopteran pests. Since the mid-1990s, use of GM cotton cultivars has greatly reduced the amount of pesticides used in many cotton systems. However, pests not controlled by the GM traits have usually emerged as problems, especially the sucking bug complex. Control of this complex with pesticides often causes a reduction in beneficial invertebrate populations, allowing other secondary pests to increase rapidly and require control. Control of both sucking bug complex and secondary pests is problematic due to the cost of pesticides and/or high risk of selecting for pesticide resistance. Deployment of host plant resistance (HPR) provides an opportunity to manage these issues in GM cotton systems. Cotton cultivars resistant to the sucking bug complex and/or secondary pests would require fewer pesticide applications, reducing costs and risks to beneficial invertebrate populations and pesticide resistance. Incorporation of HPR traits into elite cotton cultivars with high yield and fiber quality offers the potential to further reduce pesticide use and increase the durability of pest management in GM cotton systems. We review the challenges that the identification and use of HPR against invertebrate pests brings to cotton breeding. We explore sources of resistance to the sucking bug complex and secondary pests, the mechanisms that control them and the approaches to incorporate these defense traits to commercial cultivars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4840675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48406752016-05-04 Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance Trapero, Carlos Wilson, Iain W. Stiller, Warwick N. Wilson, Lewis J. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Cotton has lost many ancestral defensive traits against key invertebrate pests. This is suggested by the levels of resistance to some pests found in wild cotton genotypes as well as in cultivated landraces and is a result of domestication and a long history of targeted breeding for yield and fiber quality, along with the capacity to control pests with pesticides. Genetic modification (GM) allowed integration of toxins from a bacteria into cotton to control key Lepidopteran pests. Since the mid-1990s, use of GM cotton cultivars has greatly reduced the amount of pesticides used in many cotton systems. However, pests not controlled by the GM traits have usually emerged as problems, especially the sucking bug complex. Control of this complex with pesticides often causes a reduction in beneficial invertebrate populations, allowing other secondary pests to increase rapidly and require control. Control of both sucking bug complex and secondary pests is problematic due to the cost of pesticides and/or high risk of selecting for pesticide resistance. Deployment of host plant resistance (HPR) provides an opportunity to manage these issues in GM cotton systems. Cotton cultivars resistant to the sucking bug complex and/or secondary pests would require fewer pesticide applications, reducing costs and risks to beneficial invertebrate populations and pesticide resistance. Incorporation of HPR traits into elite cotton cultivars with high yield and fiber quality offers the potential to further reduce pesticide use and increase the durability of pest management in GM cotton systems. We review the challenges that the identification and use of HPR against invertebrate pests brings to cotton breeding. We explore sources of resistance to the sucking bug complex and secondary pests, the mechanisms that control them and the approaches to incorporate these defense traits to commercial cultivars. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4840675/ /pubmed/27148323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00500 Text en Copyright © 2016 Trapero, Wilson, Stiller and Wilson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Trapero, Carlos
Wilson, Iain W.
Stiller, Warwick N.
Wilson, Lewis J.
Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance
title Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance
title_full Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance
title_fullStr Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance
title_short Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance
title_sort enhancing integrated pest management in gm cotton systems using host plant resistance
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4840675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00500
work_keys_str_mv AT traperocarlos enhancingintegratedpestmanagementingmcottonsystemsusinghostplantresistance
AT wilsoniainw enhancingintegratedpestmanagementingmcottonsystemsusinghostplantresistance
AT stillerwarwickn enhancingintegratedpestmanagementingmcottonsystemsusinghostplantresistance
AT wilsonlewisj enhancingintegratedpestmanagementingmcottonsystemsusinghostplantresistance