Cargando…
Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances
This paper aims to give a broad coverage of central concepts and principles involved in automated causal inference and emerging approaches to causal discovery from i.i.d data and from time series. After reviewing concepts including manipulations, causal models, sample predictive modeling, causal pre...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x |
_version_ | 1782428363035508736 |
---|---|
author | Spirtes, Peter Zhang, Kun |
author_facet | Spirtes, Peter Zhang, Kun |
author_sort | Spirtes, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper aims to give a broad coverage of central concepts and principles involved in automated causal inference and emerging approaches to causal discovery from i.i.d data and from time series. After reviewing concepts including manipulations, causal models, sample predictive modeling, causal predictive modeling, and structural equation models, we present the constraint-based approach to causal discovery, which relies on the conditional independence relationships in the data, and discuss the assumptions underlying its validity. We then focus on causal discovery based on structural equations models, in which a key issue is the identifiability of the causal structure implied by appropriately defined structural equation models: in the two-variable case, under what conditions (and why) is the causal direction between the two variables identifiable? We show that the independence between the error term and causes, together with appropriate structural constraints on the structural equation, makes it possible. Next, we report some recent advances in causal discovery from time series. Assuming that the causal relations are linear with nonGaussian noise, we mention two problems which are traditionally difficult to solve, namely causal discovery from subsampled data and that in the presence of confounding time series. Finally, we list a number of open questions in the field of causal discovery and inference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4841209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48412092016-05-16 Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances Spirtes, Peter Zhang, Kun Appl Inform (Berl) Review This paper aims to give a broad coverage of central concepts and principles involved in automated causal inference and emerging approaches to causal discovery from i.i.d data and from time series. After reviewing concepts including manipulations, causal models, sample predictive modeling, causal predictive modeling, and structural equation models, we present the constraint-based approach to causal discovery, which relies on the conditional independence relationships in the data, and discuss the assumptions underlying its validity. We then focus on causal discovery based on structural equations models, in which a key issue is the identifiability of the causal structure implied by appropriately defined structural equation models: in the two-variable case, under what conditions (and why) is the causal direction between the two variables identifiable? We show that the independence between the error term and causes, together with appropriate structural constraints on the structural equation, makes it possible. Next, we report some recent advances in causal discovery from time series. Assuming that the causal relations are linear with nonGaussian noise, we mention two problems which are traditionally difficult to solve, namely causal discovery from subsampled data and that in the presence of confounding time series. Finally, we list a number of open questions in the field of causal discovery and inference. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-18 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4841209/ /pubmed/27195202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x Text en © Spirtes and Zhang. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Spirtes, Peter Zhang, Kun Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances |
title | Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances |
title_full | Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances |
title_fullStr | Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances |
title_full_unstemmed | Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances |
title_short | Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances |
title_sort | causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spirtespeter causaldiscoveryandinferenceconceptsandrecentmethodologicaladvances AT zhangkun causaldiscoveryandinferenceconceptsandrecentmethodologicaladvances |