Cargando…
Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms
Time-of-day effects in human psychological functioning have been known of since the 1800s. However, outside of research specifically focused on the quantification of circadian rhythms, their study has largely been neglected. Moves toward online data collection now mean that psychological investigati...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27114886 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1947 |
_version_ | 1782428365100154880 |
---|---|
author | Schofield, Timothy P. |
author_facet | Schofield, Timothy P. |
author_sort | Schofield, Timothy P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Time-of-day effects in human psychological functioning have been known of since the 1800s. However, outside of research specifically focused on the quantification of circadian rhythms, their study has largely been neglected. Moves toward online data collection now mean that psychological investigations take place around the clock, which affords researchers the ability to easily study time-of-day effects. Recent analyses have shown, for instance, that implicit attitudes have time-of-day effects. The plausibility that these effects indicate circadian rhythms rather than selection effects is considered in the current study. There was little evidence that the time-of-day effects in implicit attitudes shifted appropriately with factors known to influence the time of circadian rhythms. Moreover, even variables that cannot logically show circadian rhythms demonstrated stronger time-of-day effects than did implicit attitudes. Taken together, these results suggest that time-of-day effects in implicit attitudes are more likely to represent processes of selection rather than circadian rhythms, but do not rule out the latter possibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4841218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48412182016-04-25 Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms Schofield, Timothy P. PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology Time-of-day effects in human psychological functioning have been known of since the 1800s. However, outside of research specifically focused on the quantification of circadian rhythms, their study has largely been neglected. Moves toward online data collection now mean that psychological investigations take place around the clock, which affords researchers the ability to easily study time-of-day effects. Recent analyses have shown, for instance, that implicit attitudes have time-of-day effects. The plausibility that these effects indicate circadian rhythms rather than selection effects is considered in the current study. There was little evidence that the time-of-day effects in implicit attitudes shifted appropriately with factors known to influence the time of circadian rhythms. Moreover, even variables that cannot logically show circadian rhythms demonstrated stronger time-of-day effects than did implicit attitudes. Taken together, these results suggest that time-of-day effects in implicit attitudes are more likely to represent processes of selection rather than circadian rhythms, but do not rule out the latter possibility. PeerJ Inc. 2016-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4841218/ /pubmed/27114886 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1947 Text en © 2016 Schofield http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Anatomy and Physiology Schofield, Timothy P. Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms |
title | Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms |
title_full | Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms |
title_fullStr | Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms |
title_full_unstemmed | Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms |
title_short | Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms |
title_sort | time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms |
topic | Anatomy and Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27114886 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schofieldtimothyp timeofdayeffectsinimplicitracialingrouppreferencesarelikelyselectioneffectsnotcircadianrhythms |