Cargando…
Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF: Guidance for physicians
OBJECTIVE: To define, using assays of optimized sensitivity and specificity, the most informative specimen type for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) detection. METHODS: Results were reviewed from longitudinal service testing for AQP4-IgG among specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmun...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27144221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000231 |
_version_ | 1782428422103891968 |
---|---|
author | Majed, Masoud Fryer, James P. McKeon, Andrew Lennon, Vanda A. Pittock, Sean J. |
author_facet | Majed, Masoud Fryer, James P. McKeon, Andrew Lennon, Vanda A. Pittock, Sean J. |
author_sort | Majed, Masoud |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To define, using assays of optimized sensitivity and specificity, the most informative specimen type for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) detection. METHODS: Results were reviewed from longitudinal service testing for AQP4-IgG among specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory from 101,065 individual patients. Paired samples of serum/CSF were tested from 616 patients, using M1-AQP4-transfected cell-based assays (both fixed AQP4-CBA Euroimmun kit [commercial CBA] and live in-house flow cytometry [FACS]). Sensitivities were compared for 58 time-matched paired specimens (drawn ≤30 days apart) from patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or high-risk patients. RESULTS: The frequency of CSF submission as sole initial specimen was 1 in 50 in 2007 and 1 in 5 in 2015. In no case among 616 paired specimens was CSF positive and serum negative. In 58 time-matched paired specimens, AQP4-IgG was detected by FACS or by commercial CBA more sensitively in serum than in CSF (respectively, p = 0.06 and p < 0.001). A serum titer >1:100 predicted CSF positivity (p < 0.001). The probability of CSF positivity was greater around attack time (p = 0.03). No control specimen from 128 neurologic patients was positive by either assay. CONCLUSIONS: FACS and commercial CBA detection of AQP4-IgG is less sensitive in CSF than in serum. The data suggest that most AQP4-IgG is produced in peripheral lymphoid tissues and that a critical serum/CSF gradient is required for IgG to penetrate the CNS in pathogenic quantity. Serum is the optimal and most cost-effective specimen for AQP4-IgG testing. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with NMO or NMOSD, CSF is less sensitive than serum for detection of AQP4-IgG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4841640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48416402016-05-03 Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF: Guidance for physicians Majed, Masoud Fryer, James P. McKeon, Andrew Lennon, Vanda A. Pittock, Sean J. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Article OBJECTIVE: To define, using assays of optimized sensitivity and specificity, the most informative specimen type for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) detection. METHODS: Results were reviewed from longitudinal service testing for AQP4-IgG among specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory from 101,065 individual patients. Paired samples of serum/CSF were tested from 616 patients, using M1-AQP4-transfected cell-based assays (both fixed AQP4-CBA Euroimmun kit [commercial CBA] and live in-house flow cytometry [FACS]). Sensitivities were compared for 58 time-matched paired specimens (drawn ≤30 days apart) from patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or high-risk patients. RESULTS: The frequency of CSF submission as sole initial specimen was 1 in 50 in 2007 and 1 in 5 in 2015. In no case among 616 paired specimens was CSF positive and serum negative. In 58 time-matched paired specimens, AQP4-IgG was detected by FACS or by commercial CBA more sensitively in serum than in CSF (respectively, p = 0.06 and p < 0.001). A serum titer >1:100 predicted CSF positivity (p < 0.001). The probability of CSF positivity was greater around attack time (p = 0.03). No control specimen from 128 neurologic patients was positive by either assay. CONCLUSIONS: FACS and commercial CBA detection of AQP4-IgG is less sensitive in CSF than in serum. The data suggest that most AQP4-IgG is produced in peripheral lymphoid tissues and that a critical serum/CSF gradient is required for IgG to penetrate the CNS in pathogenic quantity. Serum is the optimal and most cost-effective specimen for AQP4-IgG testing. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with NMO or NMOSD, CSF is less sensitive than serum for detection of AQP4-IgG. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4841640/ /pubmed/27144221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000231 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Article Majed, Masoud Fryer, James P. McKeon, Andrew Lennon, Vanda A. Pittock, Sean J. Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF: Guidance for physicians |
title | Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF: Guidance for physicians |
title_full | Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF: Guidance for physicians |
title_fullStr | Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF: Guidance for physicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF: Guidance for physicians |
title_short | Clinical utility of testing AQP4-IgG in CSF: Guidance for physicians |
title_sort | clinical utility of testing aqp4-igg in csf: guidance for physicians |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27144221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majedmasoud clinicalutilityoftestingaqp4iggincsfguidanceforphysicians AT fryerjamesp clinicalutilityoftestingaqp4iggincsfguidanceforphysicians AT mckeonandrew clinicalutilityoftestingaqp4iggincsfguidanceforphysicians AT lennonvandaa clinicalutilityoftestingaqp4iggincsfguidanceforphysicians AT pittockseanj clinicalutilityoftestingaqp4iggincsfguidanceforphysicians |