Cargando…

Neural signatures of perceptual inference

Generative models, such as predictive coding, posit that perception results from a combination of sensory input and prior prediction, each weighted by its precision (inverse variance), with incongruence between these termed prediction error (deviation from prediction) or surprise (negative log proba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sedley, William, Gander, Phillip E, Kumar, Sukhbinder, Kovach, Christopher K, Oya, Hiroyuki, Kawasaki, Hiroto, Howard, Matthew A, Griffiths, Timothy D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949254
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11476
_version_ 1782428427133911040
author Sedley, William
Gander, Phillip E
Kumar, Sukhbinder
Kovach, Christopher K
Oya, Hiroyuki
Kawasaki, Hiroto
Howard, Matthew A
Griffiths, Timothy D
author_facet Sedley, William
Gander, Phillip E
Kumar, Sukhbinder
Kovach, Christopher K
Oya, Hiroyuki
Kawasaki, Hiroto
Howard, Matthew A
Griffiths, Timothy D
author_sort Sedley, William
collection PubMed
description Generative models, such as predictive coding, posit that perception results from a combination of sensory input and prior prediction, each weighted by its precision (inverse variance), with incongruence between these termed prediction error (deviation from prediction) or surprise (negative log probability of the sensory input). However, direct evidence for such a system, and the physiological basis of its computations, is lacking. Using an auditory stimulus whose pitch value changed according to specific rules, we controlled and separated the three key computational variables underlying perception, and discovered, using direct recordings from human auditory cortex, that surprise due to prediction violations is encoded by local field potential oscillations in the gamma band (>30 Hz), changes to predictions in the beta band (12-30 Hz), and that the precision of predictions appears to quantitatively relate to alpha band oscillations (8-12 Hz). These results confirm oscillatory codes for critical aspects of generative models of perception. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11476.001
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4841773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48417732016-04-25 Neural signatures of perceptual inference Sedley, William Gander, Phillip E Kumar, Sukhbinder Kovach, Christopher K Oya, Hiroyuki Kawasaki, Hiroto Howard, Matthew A Griffiths, Timothy D eLife Neuroscience Generative models, such as predictive coding, posit that perception results from a combination of sensory input and prior prediction, each weighted by its precision (inverse variance), with incongruence between these termed prediction error (deviation from prediction) or surprise (negative log probability of the sensory input). However, direct evidence for such a system, and the physiological basis of its computations, is lacking. Using an auditory stimulus whose pitch value changed according to specific rules, we controlled and separated the three key computational variables underlying perception, and discovered, using direct recordings from human auditory cortex, that surprise due to prediction violations is encoded by local field potential oscillations in the gamma band (>30 Hz), changes to predictions in the beta band (12-30 Hz), and that the precision of predictions appears to quantitatively relate to alpha band oscillations (8-12 Hz). These results confirm oscillatory codes for critical aspects of generative models of perception. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11476.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4841773/ /pubmed/26949254 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11476 Text en © 2016, Sedley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sedley, William
Gander, Phillip E
Kumar, Sukhbinder
Kovach, Christopher K
Oya, Hiroyuki
Kawasaki, Hiroto
Howard, Matthew A
Griffiths, Timothy D
Neural signatures of perceptual inference
title Neural signatures of perceptual inference
title_full Neural signatures of perceptual inference
title_fullStr Neural signatures of perceptual inference
title_full_unstemmed Neural signatures of perceptual inference
title_short Neural signatures of perceptual inference
title_sort neural signatures of perceptual inference
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949254
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11476
work_keys_str_mv AT sedleywilliam neuralsignaturesofperceptualinference
AT ganderphillipe neuralsignaturesofperceptualinference
AT kumarsukhbinder neuralsignaturesofperceptualinference
AT kovachchristopherk neuralsignaturesofperceptualinference
AT oyahiroyuki neuralsignaturesofperceptualinference
AT kawasakihiroto neuralsignaturesofperceptualinference
AT howardmatthewa neuralsignaturesofperceptualinference
AT griffithstimothyd neuralsignaturesofperceptualinference