Cargando…
Validation of the ‘Test of the Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients
Background: To validate the ‘Test of Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI), a 12-item questionnaire designed to assess the adherence to inhalers in patients with COPD or asthma. Methods: A total of 1009 patients with asthma or COPD participated in a cross-sectional multicenter study. Patients with electronic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26230150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2015.1212 |
_version_ | 1782428446669930496 |
---|---|
author | Plaza, Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez, Concepción Melero, Carlos Cosío, Borja G. Entrenas, Luís Manuel de Llano, Luis Pérez Gutiérrez-Pereyra, Fernando Tarragona, Eduard Palomino, Rosa López-Viña, Antolín |
author_facet | Plaza, Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez, Concepción Melero, Carlos Cosío, Borja G. Entrenas, Luís Manuel de Llano, Luis Pérez Gutiérrez-Pereyra, Fernando Tarragona, Eduard Palomino, Rosa López-Viña, Antolín |
author_sort | Plaza, Vicente |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: To validate the ‘Test of Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI), a 12-item questionnaire designed to assess the adherence to inhalers in patients with COPD or asthma. Methods: A total of 1009 patients with asthma or COPD participated in a cross-sectional multicenter study. Patients with electronic adherence ≥80% were defined as adherents. Construct validity, internal validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Self-reported adherence was compared with the Morisky-Green questionnaire. Results: Factor analysis study demonstrated two factors, factor 1 was coincident with TAI patient domain (items 1 to 10) and factor 2 with TAI health-care professional domain (items 11 and 12). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.860 and the test-retest reliability 0.883. TAI scores correlated with electronic adherence (ρ=0.293, p=0.01). According to the best cut-off for 10 items (score 50, area under the ROC curve 0.7), 569 (62.5%) patients were classified as non-adherents. The non-adherence behavior pattern was: erratic 527 (57.9%), deliberate 375 (41.2%), and unwitting 242 (26.6%) patients. As compared to Morisky-Green test, TAI showed better psychometric properties. Conclusions: The TAI is a reliable and homogeneous questionnaire to identify easily non-adherence and to classify from a clinical perspective the barriers related to the use of inhalers in asthma and COPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4841905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48419052016-05-06 Validation of the ‘Test of the Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients Plaza, Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez, Concepción Melero, Carlos Cosío, Borja G. Entrenas, Luís Manuel de Llano, Luis Pérez Gutiérrez-Pereyra, Fernando Tarragona, Eduard Palomino, Rosa López-Viña, Antolín J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Original Research Background: To validate the ‘Test of Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI), a 12-item questionnaire designed to assess the adherence to inhalers in patients with COPD or asthma. Methods: A total of 1009 patients with asthma or COPD participated in a cross-sectional multicenter study. Patients with electronic adherence ≥80% were defined as adherents. Construct validity, internal validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Self-reported adherence was compared with the Morisky-Green questionnaire. Results: Factor analysis study demonstrated two factors, factor 1 was coincident with TAI patient domain (items 1 to 10) and factor 2 with TAI health-care professional domain (items 11 and 12). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.860 and the test-retest reliability 0.883. TAI scores correlated with electronic adherence (ρ=0.293, p=0.01). According to the best cut-off for 10 items (score 50, area under the ROC curve 0.7), 569 (62.5%) patients were classified as non-adherents. The non-adherence behavior pattern was: erratic 527 (57.9%), deliberate 375 (41.2%), and unwitting 242 (26.6%) patients. As compared to Morisky-Green test, TAI showed better psychometric properties. Conclusions: The TAI is a reliable and homogeneous questionnaire to identify easily non-adherence and to classify from a clinical perspective the barriers related to the use of inhalers in asthma and COPD. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4841905/ /pubmed/26230150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2015.1212 Text en © The Author(s) 2015; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Plaza, Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez, Concepción Melero, Carlos Cosío, Borja G. Entrenas, Luís Manuel de Llano, Luis Pérez Gutiérrez-Pereyra, Fernando Tarragona, Eduard Palomino, Rosa López-Viña, Antolín Validation of the ‘Test of the Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients |
title | Validation of the ‘Test of the Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients |
title_full | Validation of the ‘Test of the Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients |
title_fullStr | Validation of the ‘Test of the Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the ‘Test of the Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients |
title_short | Validation of the ‘Test of the Adherence to Inhalers’ (TAI) for Asthma and COPD Patients |
title_sort | validation of the ‘test of the adherence to inhalers’ (tai) for asthma and copd patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26230150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2015.1212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plazavicente validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT fernandezrodriguezconcepcion validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT melerocarlos validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT cosioborjag validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT entrenasluismanuel validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT dellanoluisperez validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT gutierrezpereyrafernando validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT tarragonaeduard validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT palominorosa validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients AT lopezvinaantolin validationofthetestoftheadherencetoinhalerstaiforasthmaandcopdpatients |