Cargando…
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
Introduction. The placement of ring or band around the gastric tube might prevent the dilation after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). We describe the first randomized study comparing LSG and Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy (LBSG). Material and Method. Fifty obese patients were enrolled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4842065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6419603 |
_version_ | 1782428471376478208 |
---|---|
author | Tognoni, Valeria Benavoli, Domenico Bianciardi, Emanuela Perrone, Federico Ippoliti, Simona Gaspari, Achille Gentileschi, Paolo |
author_facet | Tognoni, Valeria Benavoli, Domenico Bianciardi, Emanuela Perrone, Federico Ippoliti, Simona Gaspari, Achille Gentileschi, Paolo |
author_sort | Tognoni, Valeria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. The placement of ring or band around the gastric tube might prevent the dilation after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). We describe the first randomized study comparing LSG and Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy (LBSG). Material and Method. Fifty obese patients were enrolled in the study between January 2014 and January 2015. We analysed differences in operative time, complication rate, mortality, and BMI between the two groups over a period of 12 months. Results. Twenty-five patients received LSG (group A) and 25 LBSG (group B). The mean preoperative BMI was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m(2) and 44.95 ± 5.85 kg/m(2), respectively, in the two groups. There was no statistical relevant difference in operative time. No intraoperative complications occurred. Mean BMI registered after 3, 6, and 12 months in groups A and B, respectively, were 37.86 ± 5.72 kg/m(2) and 37.58 ± 6.21 kg/m(2) (p = 0.869), 33.64 ± 6.08 kg/m(2) and 32.03 ± 5.24 kg/m(2) (p = 0.325), and 29.72 ± 4.40 kg/m(2) and 27.42 ± 4.47 kg/m(2) (p = 0.186); no statistical relevant difference was registered between the two groups. Conclusion. LBSG is a safe and feasible procedure. The time required for the device positioning did not influence significantly the surgical time. The results of bodyweight loss did not document any statistically significant differences among the two groups, even though LBSG group showed a mean BMI slightly lower than that of the control group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4842065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48420652016-05-03 Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study Tognoni, Valeria Benavoli, Domenico Bianciardi, Emanuela Perrone, Federico Ippoliti, Simona Gaspari, Achille Gentileschi, Paolo Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Introduction. The placement of ring or band around the gastric tube might prevent the dilation after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). We describe the first randomized study comparing LSG and Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy (LBSG). Material and Method. Fifty obese patients were enrolled in the study between January 2014 and January 2015. We analysed differences in operative time, complication rate, mortality, and BMI between the two groups over a period of 12 months. Results. Twenty-five patients received LSG (group A) and 25 LBSG (group B). The mean preoperative BMI was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m(2) and 44.95 ± 5.85 kg/m(2), respectively, in the two groups. There was no statistical relevant difference in operative time. No intraoperative complications occurred. Mean BMI registered after 3, 6, and 12 months in groups A and B, respectively, were 37.86 ± 5.72 kg/m(2) and 37.58 ± 6.21 kg/m(2) (p = 0.869), 33.64 ± 6.08 kg/m(2) and 32.03 ± 5.24 kg/m(2) (p = 0.325), and 29.72 ± 4.40 kg/m(2) and 27.42 ± 4.47 kg/m(2) (p = 0.186); no statistical relevant difference was registered between the two groups. Conclusion. LBSG is a safe and feasible procedure. The time required for the device positioning did not influence significantly the surgical time. The results of bodyweight loss did not document any statistically significant differences among the two groups, even though LBSG group showed a mean BMI slightly lower than that of the control group. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4842065/ /pubmed/27143964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6419603 Text en Copyright © 2016 Valeria Tognoni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Tognoni, Valeria Benavoli, Domenico Bianciardi, Emanuela Perrone, Federico Ippoliti, Simona Gaspari, Achille Gentileschi, Paolo Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study |
title | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study |
title_full | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study |
title_short | Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study |
title_sort | laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy: first prospective pilot randomized study |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4842065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6419603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tognonivaleria laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy AT benavolidomenico laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy AT bianciardiemanuela laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy AT perronefederico laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy AT ippolitisimona laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy AT gaspariachille laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy AT gentileschipaolo laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy |