Cargando…

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study

Introduction. The placement of ring or band around the gastric tube might prevent the dilation after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). We describe the first randomized study comparing LSG and Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy (LBSG). Material and Method. Fifty obese patients were enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tognoni, Valeria, Benavoli, Domenico, Bianciardi, Emanuela, Perrone, Federico, Ippoliti, Simona, Gaspari, Achille, Gentileschi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4842065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6419603
_version_ 1782428471376478208
author Tognoni, Valeria
Benavoli, Domenico
Bianciardi, Emanuela
Perrone, Federico
Ippoliti, Simona
Gaspari, Achille
Gentileschi, Paolo
author_facet Tognoni, Valeria
Benavoli, Domenico
Bianciardi, Emanuela
Perrone, Federico
Ippoliti, Simona
Gaspari, Achille
Gentileschi, Paolo
author_sort Tognoni, Valeria
collection PubMed
description Introduction. The placement of ring or band around the gastric tube might prevent the dilation after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). We describe the first randomized study comparing LSG and Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy (LBSG). Material and Method. Fifty obese patients were enrolled in the study between January 2014 and January 2015. We analysed differences in operative time, complication rate, mortality, and BMI between the two groups over a period of 12 months. Results. Twenty-five patients received LSG (group A) and 25 LBSG (group B). The mean preoperative BMI was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m(2) and 44.95 ± 5.85 kg/m(2), respectively, in the two groups. There was no statistical relevant difference in operative time. No intraoperative complications occurred. Mean BMI registered after 3, 6, and 12 months in groups A and B, respectively, were 37.86 ± 5.72 kg/m(2) and 37.58 ± 6.21 kg/m(2) (p = 0.869), 33.64 ± 6.08 kg/m(2) and 32.03 ± 5.24 kg/m(2) (p = 0.325), and 29.72 ± 4.40 kg/m(2) and 27.42 ± 4.47 kg/m(2) (p = 0.186); no statistical relevant difference was registered between the two groups. Conclusion. LBSG is a safe and feasible procedure. The time required for the device positioning did not influence significantly the surgical time. The results of bodyweight loss did not document any statistically significant differences among the two groups, even though LBSG group showed a mean BMI slightly lower than that of the control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4842065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48420652016-05-03 Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study Tognoni, Valeria Benavoli, Domenico Bianciardi, Emanuela Perrone, Federico Ippoliti, Simona Gaspari, Achille Gentileschi, Paolo Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Introduction. The placement of ring or band around the gastric tube might prevent the dilation after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). We describe the first randomized study comparing LSG and Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy (LBSG). Material and Method. Fifty obese patients were enrolled in the study between January 2014 and January 2015. We analysed differences in operative time, complication rate, mortality, and BMI between the two groups over a period of 12 months. Results. Twenty-five patients received LSG (group A) and 25 LBSG (group B). The mean preoperative BMI was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m(2) and 44.95 ± 5.85 kg/m(2), respectively, in the two groups. There was no statistical relevant difference in operative time. No intraoperative complications occurred. Mean BMI registered after 3, 6, and 12 months in groups A and B, respectively, were 37.86 ± 5.72 kg/m(2) and 37.58 ± 6.21 kg/m(2) (p = 0.869), 33.64 ± 6.08 kg/m(2) and 32.03 ± 5.24 kg/m(2) (p = 0.325), and 29.72 ± 4.40 kg/m(2) and 27.42 ± 4.47 kg/m(2) (p = 0.186); no statistical relevant difference was registered between the two groups. Conclusion. LBSG is a safe and feasible procedure. The time required for the device positioning did not influence significantly the surgical time. The results of bodyweight loss did not document any statistically significant differences among the two groups, even though LBSG group showed a mean BMI slightly lower than that of the control group. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4842065/ /pubmed/27143964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6419603 Text en Copyright © 2016 Valeria Tognoni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Tognoni, Valeria
Benavoli, Domenico
Bianciardi, Emanuela
Perrone, Federico
Ippoliti, Simona
Gaspari, Achille
Gentileschi, Paolo
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
title Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
title_full Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
title_short Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
title_sort laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy: first prospective pilot randomized study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4842065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6419603
work_keys_str_mv AT tognonivaleria laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy
AT benavolidomenico laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy
AT bianciardiemanuela laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy
AT perronefederico laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy
AT ippolitisimona laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy
AT gaspariachille laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy
AT gentileschipaolo laparoscopicsleevegastrectomyversuslaparoscopicbandedsleevegastrectomyfirstprospectivepilotrandomizedstudy