AB205. Open prostatectomy vs. laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with large volume prostate: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic prostatectomy with open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with large volume. METHODS: The literature was identified systematically using Medline, Embase. Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.0. RESULTS: Three CCTs were included. There was no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, H, Xie, KJ, Jiang, CH, Zeng, JW, Huang, MP, Liu, QL, Huang, JB, Huang, TH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2016
Materias:
Printed Abstracts
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4842714/
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.s205
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic prostatectomy with open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with large volume. METHODS: The literature was identified systematically using Medline, Embase. Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.0. RESULTS: Three CCTs were included. There was no difference between LP and OP in terms of IPSS, Qmax. LP was associated with significantly less blood loss, a shorter irrigation, catheterization and hospital stay time except longer operating time. LP and OP were similar in terms of urethral stricture, incontinence, transfusion requirement and rate of reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: LP served a significant improvement in IPSS, Qmax as well as OP. Although more operating time and less resected tissue, LP has several advantages over OP. It was as safe as OP in terms of adverse events.

Ejemplares similares