Cargando…

Seroprevalence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Susceptible Wildlife in Israel

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemics recur in Israel almost every year. Wild even-toed ungulates are seldom affected during these epidemics. The seroprevalence of FMD in wild ungulates during 2000 and 2005–2013 was estimated using anti-non-structural proteins ELISA. Overall, 209 samples were teste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elnekave, Ehud, King, Roni, van Maanen, Kees, Shilo, Hila, Gelman, Boris, Storm, Nick, Klement, Eyal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4842776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00032
_version_ 1782428592207036416
author Elnekave, Ehud
King, Roni
van Maanen, Kees
Shilo, Hila
Gelman, Boris
Storm, Nick
Klement, Eyal
author_facet Elnekave, Ehud
King, Roni
van Maanen, Kees
Shilo, Hila
Gelman, Boris
Storm, Nick
Klement, Eyal
author_sort Elnekave, Ehud
collection PubMed
description Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemics recur in Israel almost every year. Wild even-toed ungulates are seldom affected during these epidemics. The seroprevalence of FMD in wild ungulates during 2000 and 2005–2013 was estimated using anti-non-structural proteins ELISA. Overall, 209 samples were tested, comprising sera of 120 wild boar (Sus scrofa lybicus), 64 mountain gazelles (Gazella gazella gazella), 6 water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis), and 19 Persian fallow deer (Dama dama mesopotamica). None of the tested animals presented clinical signs of FMD during blood collection. Sixteen samples [7.7% (95% confidence interval (CI(95%)) = 4.4–12.1%)] were found to be seropositive. Fifteen out of 120 samples (12.5%) from wild boar were seropositive, compared with only 1 out of 89 samples (1.1%) from all other species combined (Fisher’s exact test: p = 0.003). Most of the positive samples obtained from wild boar [13/15 (86.7%)] were collected during 2007, and analysis was restricted to that year and species only. The seroprevalence of FMD in this species during 2007 was estimated at 54.2% (CI(95%) = 32.8–74.5%; n = 24). A significant infection cluster, comprising nine seropositive samples collected in three different locations, was identified in the north-eastern part of Israel. These findings indicate that wild boar was affected during the 2007 FMD epidemic, even though wild boar presenting FMD typical clinical signs were not observed during that year. The actual role of wild boar in the spread of FMD virus in this epidemic, however, could not be determined. The negligible seroprevalence of FMD found for all other surveillance years indicates that ongoing circulation of FMD among wildlife in Israel is unlikely. It is concluded that while the role of wildlife species in the dynamics of FMD in Israel is usually limited, there might be occasions, in which wildlife plays a part in the spread of the virus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4842776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48427762016-05-19 Seroprevalence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Susceptible Wildlife in Israel Elnekave, Ehud King, Roni van Maanen, Kees Shilo, Hila Gelman, Boris Storm, Nick Klement, Eyal Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemics recur in Israel almost every year. Wild even-toed ungulates are seldom affected during these epidemics. The seroprevalence of FMD in wild ungulates during 2000 and 2005–2013 was estimated using anti-non-structural proteins ELISA. Overall, 209 samples were tested, comprising sera of 120 wild boar (Sus scrofa lybicus), 64 mountain gazelles (Gazella gazella gazella), 6 water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis), and 19 Persian fallow deer (Dama dama mesopotamica). None of the tested animals presented clinical signs of FMD during blood collection. Sixteen samples [7.7% (95% confidence interval (CI(95%)) = 4.4–12.1%)] were found to be seropositive. Fifteen out of 120 samples (12.5%) from wild boar were seropositive, compared with only 1 out of 89 samples (1.1%) from all other species combined (Fisher’s exact test: p = 0.003). Most of the positive samples obtained from wild boar [13/15 (86.7%)] were collected during 2007, and analysis was restricted to that year and species only. The seroprevalence of FMD in this species during 2007 was estimated at 54.2% (CI(95%) = 32.8–74.5%; n = 24). A significant infection cluster, comprising nine seropositive samples collected in three different locations, was identified in the north-eastern part of Israel. These findings indicate that wild boar was affected during the 2007 FMD epidemic, even though wild boar presenting FMD typical clinical signs were not observed during that year. The actual role of wild boar in the spread of FMD virus in this epidemic, however, could not be determined. The negligible seroprevalence of FMD found for all other surveillance years indicates that ongoing circulation of FMD among wildlife in Israel is unlikely. It is concluded that while the role of wildlife species in the dynamics of FMD in Israel is usually limited, there might be occasions, in which wildlife plays a part in the spread of the virus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4842776/ /pubmed/27200364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00032 Text en Copyright © 2016 Elnekave, King, van Maanen, Shilo, Gelman, Storm and Klement. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Elnekave, Ehud
King, Roni
van Maanen, Kees
Shilo, Hila
Gelman, Boris
Storm, Nick
Klement, Eyal
Seroprevalence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Susceptible Wildlife in Israel
title Seroprevalence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Susceptible Wildlife in Israel
title_full Seroprevalence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Susceptible Wildlife in Israel
title_fullStr Seroprevalence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Susceptible Wildlife in Israel
title_full_unstemmed Seroprevalence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Susceptible Wildlife in Israel
title_short Seroprevalence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Susceptible Wildlife in Israel
title_sort seroprevalence of foot-and-mouth disease in susceptible wildlife in israel
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4842776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00032
work_keys_str_mv AT elnekaveehud seroprevalenceoffootandmouthdiseaseinsusceptiblewildlifeinisrael
AT kingroni seroprevalenceoffootandmouthdiseaseinsusceptiblewildlifeinisrael
AT vanmaanenkees seroprevalenceoffootandmouthdiseaseinsusceptiblewildlifeinisrael
AT shilohila seroprevalenceoffootandmouthdiseaseinsusceptiblewildlifeinisrael
AT gelmanboris seroprevalenceoffootandmouthdiseaseinsusceptiblewildlifeinisrael
AT stormnick seroprevalenceoffootandmouthdiseaseinsusceptiblewildlifeinisrael
AT klementeyal seroprevalenceoffootandmouthdiseaseinsusceptiblewildlifeinisrael