Cargando…

Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of cervical radiculopathy requiring operative intervention by level and to report on the methods of treatment. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Cervical radiculopathy is a common cause of pain and can result in progressive neurologi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Han Jo, Nemani, Venu M., Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat, Vargas, Samuel Romero, Riew, K. Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4843058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27114762
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.231
_version_ 1782428622083063808
author Kim, Han Jo
Nemani, Venu M.
Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat
Vargas, Samuel Romero
Riew, K. Daniel
author_facet Kim, Han Jo
Nemani, Venu M.
Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat
Vargas, Samuel Romero
Riew, K. Daniel
author_sort Kim, Han Jo
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of cervical radiculopathy requiring operative intervention by level and to report on the methods of treatment. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Cervical radiculopathy is a common cause of pain and can result in progressive neurological deficits. Although the pathology is well understood, the actual incidence of cervical radiculopathy at particular spinal levels ultimately requiring operative intervention is unknown. METHODS: A large consecutive series of patients operated on by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of cervical radiculopathy at each level was defined for every patient. Procedures used for operative treatment were noted. Health related quality of life (HRQL) scores were collected both pre-operatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 1305 primary and 115 revision operations performed. The most common primary procedures performed were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF, 50%) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF, 28%). The most commonly affected levels were C6 (66%) and C7 (62%). Reasons for revision were pseudarthrosis (27%), clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP, 63%), persistent radiculopathy (11%), and hardware-related (2.6%). The most common procedures performed in the revision group were posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF, 42%) and ACDF (40%). The most commonly affected levels were C7 (43%) and C5 (30%). Among patients that had their index surgery at our institution, the revision rate was 6.4%. In both primary and revision cases there was a significant improvement in Neck Disability Index and visual analogue scale scores postoperatively. Postoperative HRQL scores in the revision cases were significantly worse than those in the primary cases (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the largest description of the incidence of cervical radiculopathy by level and operative outcomes in patients undergoing cervical decompression. The incidence of CASP was 4.2% in 3.3 years in this single institution series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4843058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48430582016-04-25 Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases Kim, Han Jo Nemani, Venu M. Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat Vargas, Samuel Romero Riew, K. Daniel Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of cervical radiculopathy requiring operative intervention by level and to report on the methods of treatment. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Cervical radiculopathy is a common cause of pain and can result in progressive neurological deficits. Although the pathology is well understood, the actual incidence of cervical radiculopathy at particular spinal levels ultimately requiring operative intervention is unknown. METHODS: A large consecutive series of patients operated on by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of cervical radiculopathy at each level was defined for every patient. Procedures used for operative treatment were noted. Health related quality of life (HRQL) scores were collected both pre-operatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 1305 primary and 115 revision operations performed. The most common primary procedures performed were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF, 50%) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF, 28%). The most commonly affected levels were C6 (66%) and C7 (62%). Reasons for revision were pseudarthrosis (27%), clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP, 63%), persistent radiculopathy (11%), and hardware-related (2.6%). The most common procedures performed in the revision group were posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF, 42%) and ACDF (40%). The most commonly affected levels were C7 (43%) and C5 (30%). Among patients that had their index surgery at our institution, the revision rate was 6.4%. In both primary and revision cases there was a significant improvement in Neck Disability Index and visual analogue scale scores postoperatively. Postoperative HRQL scores in the revision cases were significantly worse than those in the primary cases (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the largest description of the incidence of cervical radiculopathy by level and operative outcomes in patients undergoing cervical decompression. The incidence of CASP was 4.2% in 3.3 years in this single institution series. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2016-04 2016-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4843058/ /pubmed/27114762 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.231 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kim, Han Jo
Nemani, Venu M.
Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat
Vargas, Samuel Romero
Riew, K. Daniel
Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases
title Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases
title_full Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases
title_fullStr Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases
title_full_unstemmed Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases
title_short Cervical Radiculopathy: Incidence and Treatment of 1,420 Consecutive Cases
title_sort cervical radiculopathy: incidence and treatment of 1,420 consecutive cases
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4843058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27114762
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.231
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhanjo cervicalradiculopathyincidenceandtreatmentof1420consecutivecases
AT nemanivenum cervicalradiculopathyincidenceandtreatmentof1420consecutivecases
AT piyaskulkaewchaiwat cervicalradiculopathyincidenceandtreatmentof1420consecutivecases
AT vargassamuelromero cervicalradiculopathyincidenceandtreatmentof1420consecutivecases
AT riewkdaniel cervicalradiculopathyincidenceandtreatmentof1420consecutivecases