Cargando…

Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with percutaneous endoscopic decompression, focusing on the results of clinical evaluations. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There are no studies about two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torudom, Yingyong, Dilokhuttakarn, Thitinut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4843072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27114776
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.335
_version_ 1782428625257103360
author Torudom, Yingyong
Dilokhuttakarn, Thitinut
author_facet Torudom, Yingyong
Dilokhuttakarn, Thitinut
author_sort Torudom, Yingyong
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with percutaneous endoscopic decompression, focusing on the results of clinical evaluations. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There are no studies about two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: Medical and surgical complications were examined and clinical results were analyzed for 30 patients who consecutively underwent two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis were reviewed. The operations were performed by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. RESULTS: All patients displayed clinical improvement when were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Macnab criteria. The improvement of VAS and ODI was 8.3±0.7 to 2.3±2.6 and 65.2±13.7 to 24.0±15.5, respectively (both p<0.05). Complications were the same as for open decompression. The most common complication was transient nerve root paresthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical decompression with two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression has initial benefits, but long-term studies should pay more attention to the risks of postoperative instability and restenosis as well as the need for re-operation. Further investigations with long-term results are thus required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4843072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48430722016-04-25 Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study Torudom, Yingyong Dilokhuttakarn, Thitinut Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with percutaneous endoscopic decompression, focusing on the results of clinical evaluations. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There are no studies about two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: Medical and surgical complications were examined and clinical results were analyzed for 30 patients who consecutively underwent two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis were reviewed. The operations were performed by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. RESULTS: All patients displayed clinical improvement when were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Macnab criteria. The improvement of VAS and ODI was 8.3±0.7 to 2.3±2.6 and 65.2±13.7 to 24.0±15.5, respectively (both p<0.05). Complications were the same as for open decompression. The most common complication was transient nerve root paresthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical decompression with two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression has initial benefits, but long-term studies should pay more attention to the risks of postoperative instability and restenosis as well as the need for re-operation. Further investigations with long-term results are thus required. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2016-04 2016-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4843072/ /pubmed/27114776 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.335 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Torudom, Yingyong
Dilokhuttakarn, Thitinut
Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study
title Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study
title_full Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study
title_fullStr Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study
title_full_unstemmed Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study
title_short Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study
title_sort two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4843072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27114776
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.335
work_keys_str_mv AT torudomyingyong twoportalpercutaneousendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarspinalstenosispreliminarystudy
AT dilokhuttakarnthitinut twoportalpercutaneousendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarspinalstenosispreliminarystudy