Cargando…
Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands
Interest in management of native warm-season grasses for multiple uses is growing in southeastern USA. Forage quality response of early-succession mixed stands of big bluestem (BB, Andropogon gerardii), indiangrass (IG, Sorghastrum nutans), and little bluestem (SG, Schizachyrium scoparium) to harves...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants3020266 |
_version_ | 1782428745234120704 |
---|---|
author | Temu, Vitalis W. Rude, Brian J. Baldwin, Brian S. |
author_facet | Temu, Vitalis W. Rude, Brian J. Baldwin, Brian S. |
author_sort | Temu, Vitalis W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interest in management of native warm-season grasses for multiple uses is growing in southeastern USA. Forage quality response of early-succession mixed stands of big bluestem (BB, Andropogon gerardii), indiangrass (IG, Sorghastrum nutans), and little bluestem (SG, Schizachyrium scoparium) to harvest intervals (30-, 40-, 60-, 90 or 120-d) and durations (one or two years) were assessed in crop-field buffers. Over three years, phased harvestings were initiated in May, on sets of randomized plots, ≥90 cm apart, in five replications (blocks) to produce one-, two-, and three-year-old stands, by the third year. Whole-plot regrowths were machine-harvested after collecting species (IG and LB) sample tillers for leafiness estimates. Species-specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf-to-stem ratio (LSR) were greater for early-season harvests and shorter intervals. In a similar pattern, whole-plot crude protein concentrations were greatest for the 30-d (74 g·kg(−1) DM) and the least (40 g·kg(−1) DM) for the 120-d interval. Corresponding neutral detergent fiber (NDF) values were the lowest (620 g·kg(−1) DM) and highest (710 g·kg(−1) DM), respectively. In vitro dry matter and NDF digestibility were greater for early-season harvests at shorter intervals (63 and 720 g·kg(−1) DM). With strategic harvesting, similar stands may produce quality hay for beef cattle weight gain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4844299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48442992016-04-29 Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands Temu, Vitalis W. Rude, Brian J. Baldwin, Brian S. Plants (Basel) Article Interest in management of native warm-season grasses for multiple uses is growing in southeastern USA. Forage quality response of early-succession mixed stands of big bluestem (BB, Andropogon gerardii), indiangrass (IG, Sorghastrum nutans), and little bluestem (SG, Schizachyrium scoparium) to harvest intervals (30-, 40-, 60-, 90 or 120-d) and durations (one or two years) were assessed in crop-field buffers. Over three years, phased harvestings were initiated in May, on sets of randomized plots, ≥90 cm apart, in five replications (blocks) to produce one-, two-, and three-year-old stands, by the third year. Whole-plot regrowths were machine-harvested after collecting species (IG and LB) sample tillers for leafiness estimates. Species-specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf-to-stem ratio (LSR) were greater for early-season harvests and shorter intervals. In a similar pattern, whole-plot crude protein concentrations were greatest for the 30-d (74 g·kg(−1) DM) and the least (40 g·kg(−1) DM) for the 120-d interval. Corresponding neutral detergent fiber (NDF) values were the lowest (620 g·kg(−1) DM) and highest (710 g·kg(−1) DM), respectively. In vitro dry matter and NDF digestibility were greater for early-season harvests at shorter intervals (63 and 720 g·kg(−1) DM). With strategic harvesting, similar stands may produce quality hay for beef cattle weight gain. MDPI 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4844299/ /pubmed/27135504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants3020266 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Temu, Vitalis W. Rude, Brian J. Baldwin, Brian S. Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands |
title | Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands |
title_full | Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands |
title_fullStr | Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands |
title_full_unstemmed | Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands |
title_short | Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands |
title_sort | nutritive value response of native warm-season forage grasses to harvest intervals and durations in mixed stands |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants3020266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT temuvitalisw nutritivevalueresponseofnativewarmseasonforagegrassestoharvestintervalsanddurationsinmixedstands AT rudebrianj nutritivevalueresponseofnativewarmseasonforagegrassestoharvestintervalsanddurationsinmixedstands AT baldwinbrians nutritivevalueresponseofnativewarmseasonforagegrassestoharvestintervalsanddurationsinmixedstands |