Cargando…

Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands

Interest in management of native warm-season grasses for multiple uses is growing in southeastern USA. Forage quality response of early-succession mixed stands of big bluestem (BB, Andropogon gerardii), indiangrass (IG, Sorghastrum nutans), and little bluestem (SG, Schizachyrium scoparium) to harves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Temu, Vitalis W., Rude, Brian J., Baldwin, Brian S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants3020266
_version_ 1782428745234120704
author Temu, Vitalis W.
Rude, Brian J.
Baldwin, Brian S.
author_facet Temu, Vitalis W.
Rude, Brian J.
Baldwin, Brian S.
author_sort Temu, Vitalis W.
collection PubMed
description Interest in management of native warm-season grasses for multiple uses is growing in southeastern USA. Forage quality response of early-succession mixed stands of big bluestem (BB, Andropogon gerardii), indiangrass (IG, Sorghastrum nutans), and little bluestem (SG, Schizachyrium scoparium) to harvest intervals (30-, 40-, 60-, 90 or 120-d) and durations (one or two years) were assessed in crop-field buffers. Over three years, phased harvestings were initiated in May, on sets of randomized plots, ≥90 cm apart, in five replications (blocks) to produce one-, two-, and three-year-old stands, by the third year. Whole-plot regrowths were machine-harvested after collecting species (IG and LB) sample tillers for leafiness estimates. Species-specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf-to-stem ratio (LSR) were greater for early-season harvests and shorter intervals. In a similar pattern, whole-plot crude protein concentrations were greatest for the 30-d (74 g·kg(−1) DM) and the least (40 g·kg(−1) DM) for the 120-d interval. Corresponding neutral detergent fiber (NDF) values were the lowest (620 g·kg(−1) DM) and highest (710 g·kg(−1) DM), respectively. In vitro dry matter and NDF digestibility were greater for early-season harvests at shorter intervals (63 and 720 g·kg(−1) DM). With strategic harvesting, similar stands may produce quality hay for beef cattle weight gain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4844299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48442992016-04-29 Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands Temu, Vitalis W. Rude, Brian J. Baldwin, Brian S. Plants (Basel) Article Interest in management of native warm-season grasses for multiple uses is growing in southeastern USA. Forage quality response of early-succession mixed stands of big bluestem (BB, Andropogon gerardii), indiangrass (IG, Sorghastrum nutans), and little bluestem (SG, Schizachyrium scoparium) to harvest intervals (30-, 40-, 60-, 90 or 120-d) and durations (one or two years) were assessed in crop-field buffers. Over three years, phased harvestings were initiated in May, on sets of randomized plots, ≥90 cm apart, in five replications (blocks) to produce one-, two-, and three-year-old stands, by the third year. Whole-plot regrowths were machine-harvested after collecting species (IG and LB) sample tillers for leafiness estimates. Species-specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf-to-stem ratio (LSR) were greater for early-season harvests and shorter intervals. In a similar pattern, whole-plot crude protein concentrations were greatest for the 30-d (74 g·kg(−1) DM) and the least (40 g·kg(−1) DM) for the 120-d interval. Corresponding neutral detergent fiber (NDF) values were the lowest (620 g·kg(−1) DM) and highest (710 g·kg(−1) DM), respectively. In vitro dry matter and NDF digestibility were greater for early-season harvests at shorter intervals (63 and 720 g·kg(−1) DM). With strategic harvesting, similar stands may produce quality hay for beef cattle weight gain. MDPI 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4844299/ /pubmed/27135504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants3020266 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Temu, Vitalis W.
Rude, Brian J.
Baldwin, Brian S.
Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands
title Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands
title_full Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands
title_fullStr Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands
title_full_unstemmed Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands
title_short Nutritive Value Response of Native Warm-Season Forage Grasses to Harvest Intervals and Durations in Mixed Stands
title_sort nutritive value response of native warm-season forage grasses to harvest intervals and durations in mixed stands
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants3020266
work_keys_str_mv AT temuvitalisw nutritivevalueresponseofnativewarmseasonforagegrassestoharvestintervalsanddurationsinmixedstands
AT rudebrianj nutritivevalueresponseofnativewarmseasonforagegrassestoharvestintervalsanddurationsinmixedstands
AT baldwinbrians nutritivevalueresponseofnativewarmseasonforagegrassestoharvestintervalsanddurationsinmixedstands