Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Vortioxetine is a novel antidepressant approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder by the US Food and Drug Administration in September 2013. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder of adults. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Jie, Peng, Lilei, Li, Xiaogang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143896
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S104050
_version_ 1782428775224442880
author Fu, Jie
Peng, Lilei
Li, Xiaogang
author_facet Fu, Jie
Peng, Lilei
Li, Xiaogang
author_sort Fu, Jie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Vortioxetine is a novel antidepressant approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder by the US Food and Drug Administration in September 2013. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder of adults. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Clinical Trials databases were searched from 2000 through 2015. The abstracts of the annual meetings of the American Psychiatric Association and previous reviews were searched to identify additional studies. The search was limited to individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and there was no language restriction. Four RCTs met the selection criteria. These studies included 1,843 adult patients. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The data were pooled with a random-effects or fixed-effects model. RESULTS: The results showed that multiple doses (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/d) of vortioxetine did not significantly improve the generalized anxiety disorder symptoms compared to placebo (OR=1.16, 95% CI=0.84–1.60, Z=0.89, P=0.38; OR=1.41, 95% CI=0.82–2.41, Z=1.25, P=0.21; OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.76–1.46, Z=0.32, P=0.75, respectively). We measured the efficacy of 2.5 mg/d vortioxetine compared to 10 mg/d, and no significant differences were observed. The common adverse effects included nausea and headache. With increased dose, nausea was found to be more frequent in the vortioxetine (5 and 10 mg/d) group (OR=2.99, 95% CI=1.31–6.84, Z=2.60, P=0.009; OR=2.80, 95% CI=1.85–4.25, Z=4.85, P<0.00001, respectively), but no significant differences were observed for headache. CONCLUSION: The results showed no significant improvement in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder for vortioxetine compared to placebo, and nausea was more frequent with higher doses. So the current evidences do not support using vortioxetine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Few RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, and more studies are needed to verify our results in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4844447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48444472016-05-03 The efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis Fu, Jie Peng, Lilei Li, Xiaogang Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research OBJECTIVE: Vortioxetine is a novel antidepressant approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder by the US Food and Drug Administration in September 2013. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder of adults. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Clinical Trials databases were searched from 2000 through 2015. The abstracts of the annual meetings of the American Psychiatric Association and previous reviews were searched to identify additional studies. The search was limited to individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and there was no language restriction. Four RCTs met the selection criteria. These studies included 1,843 adult patients. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The data were pooled with a random-effects or fixed-effects model. RESULTS: The results showed that multiple doses (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/d) of vortioxetine did not significantly improve the generalized anxiety disorder symptoms compared to placebo (OR=1.16, 95% CI=0.84–1.60, Z=0.89, P=0.38; OR=1.41, 95% CI=0.82–2.41, Z=1.25, P=0.21; OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.76–1.46, Z=0.32, P=0.75, respectively). We measured the efficacy of 2.5 mg/d vortioxetine compared to 10 mg/d, and no significant differences were observed. The common adverse effects included nausea and headache. With increased dose, nausea was found to be more frequent in the vortioxetine (5 and 10 mg/d) group (OR=2.99, 95% CI=1.31–6.84, Z=2.60, P=0.009; OR=2.80, 95% CI=1.85–4.25, Z=4.85, P<0.00001, respectively), but no significant differences were observed for headache. CONCLUSION: The results showed no significant improvement in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder for vortioxetine compared to placebo, and nausea was more frequent with higher doses. So the current evidences do not support using vortioxetine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Few RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, and more studies are needed to verify our results in the future. Dove Medical Press 2016-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4844447/ /pubmed/27143896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S104050 Text en © 2016 Fu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fu, Jie
Peng, Lilei
Li, Xiaogang
The efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis
title The efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of multiple doses of vortioxetine for generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143896
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S104050
work_keys_str_mv AT fujie theefficacyandsafetyofmultipledosesofvortioxetineforgeneralizedanxietydisorderametaanalysis
AT penglilei theefficacyandsafetyofmultipledosesofvortioxetineforgeneralizedanxietydisorderametaanalysis
AT lixiaogang theefficacyandsafetyofmultipledosesofvortioxetineforgeneralizedanxietydisorderametaanalysis
AT fujie efficacyandsafetyofmultipledosesofvortioxetineforgeneralizedanxietydisorderametaanalysis
AT penglilei efficacyandsafetyofmultipledosesofvortioxetineforgeneralizedanxietydisorderametaanalysis
AT lixiaogang efficacyandsafetyofmultipledosesofvortioxetineforgeneralizedanxietydisorderametaanalysis