Cargando…

Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether trimester-specific D-dimer levels or the modified Wells score (MWS) is a useful risk stratification tool to exclude pregnant women at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) from diagnostic imaging. Study Design This is a prospective and retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parilla, Barbara V., Fournogerakis, Rachel, Archer, Amy, Sulo, Suela, Laurent, Lisa, Lee, Patricia, Chhotani, Benazir, Hesse, Kathleen, Kulstad, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582136
_version_ 1782428791722737664
author Parilla, Barbara V.
Fournogerakis, Rachel
Archer, Amy
Sulo, Suela
Laurent, Lisa
Lee, Patricia
Chhotani, Benazir
Hesse, Kathleen
Kulstad, Erik
author_facet Parilla, Barbara V.
Fournogerakis, Rachel
Archer, Amy
Sulo, Suela
Laurent, Lisa
Lee, Patricia
Chhotani, Benazir
Hesse, Kathleen
Kulstad, Erik
author_sort Parilla, Barbara V.
collection PubMed
description Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether trimester-specific D-dimer levels or the modified Wells score (MWS) is a useful risk stratification tool to exclude pregnant women at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) from diagnostic imaging. Study Design This is a prospective and retrospective cohort study. Pregnant women who underwent diagnostic imaging for suspected PE were prospectively enrolled. D-dimer serum levels were drawn, and a MWS was assigned. Pregnant women diagnosed with a PE before study launch who underwent diagnostic imaging and had a D-dimer level drawn were also evaluated. Results In this study, 17 patients were diagnosed with a PE and 42 patients had no PE on diagnostic imaging. Sixteen out of 17 patients with a PE versus 11 out of 42 without PE had an abnormal D-dimer level (p = 0.001). Four patients with a PE versus zero without a PE had an abnormal MWS (p = 0.005). The combination of a trimester-specific D-dimer level along with the MWS was abnormal in all 17 patients with a documented PE versus 11/42 (26.2%) patients without a documented PE (p = 0.001). Conclusion A combination of trimester-specific D-dimer levels along with a MWS can be used in pregnancy to triage women into a low-risk category for PE and thereby avoid radiation exposure in a majority of pregnant patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4844549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48445492016-04-26 Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? Parilla, Barbara V. Fournogerakis, Rachel Archer, Amy Sulo, Suela Laurent, Lisa Lee, Patricia Chhotani, Benazir Hesse, Kathleen Kulstad, Erik AJP Rep Article Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether trimester-specific D-dimer levels or the modified Wells score (MWS) is a useful risk stratification tool to exclude pregnant women at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) from diagnostic imaging. Study Design This is a prospective and retrospective cohort study. Pregnant women who underwent diagnostic imaging for suspected PE were prospectively enrolled. D-dimer serum levels were drawn, and a MWS was assigned. Pregnant women diagnosed with a PE before study launch who underwent diagnostic imaging and had a D-dimer level drawn were also evaluated. Results In this study, 17 patients were diagnosed with a PE and 42 patients had no PE on diagnostic imaging. Sixteen out of 17 patients with a PE versus 11 out of 42 without PE had an abnormal D-dimer level (p = 0.001). Four patients with a PE versus zero without a PE had an abnormal MWS (p = 0.005). The combination of a trimester-specific D-dimer level along with the MWS was abnormal in all 17 patients with a documented PE versus 11/42 (26.2%) patients without a documented PE (p = 0.001). Conclusion A combination of trimester-specific D-dimer levels along with a MWS can be used in pregnancy to triage women into a low-risk category for PE and thereby avoid radiation exposure in a majority of pregnant patients. Thieme Medical Publishers 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4844549/ /pubmed/27119048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582136 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Parilla, Barbara V.
Fournogerakis, Rachel
Archer, Amy
Sulo, Suela
Laurent, Lisa
Lee, Patricia
Chhotani, Benazir
Hesse, Kathleen
Kulstad, Erik
Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?
title Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?
title_full Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?
title_fullStr Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?
title_short Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?
title_sort diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: are biomarkers and clinical predictive models useful?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582136
work_keys_str_mv AT parillabarbarav diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful
AT fournogerakisrachel diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful
AT archeramy diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful
AT sulosuela diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful
AT laurentlisa diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful
AT leepatricia diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful
AT chhotanibenazir diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful
AT hessekathleen diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful
AT kulstaderik diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful