Cargando…
Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether trimester-specific D-dimer levels or the modified Wells score (MWS) is a useful risk stratification tool to exclude pregnant women at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) from diagnostic imaging. Study Design This is a prospective and retr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582136 |
_version_ | 1782428791722737664 |
---|---|
author | Parilla, Barbara V. Fournogerakis, Rachel Archer, Amy Sulo, Suela Laurent, Lisa Lee, Patricia Chhotani, Benazir Hesse, Kathleen Kulstad, Erik |
author_facet | Parilla, Barbara V. Fournogerakis, Rachel Archer, Amy Sulo, Suela Laurent, Lisa Lee, Patricia Chhotani, Benazir Hesse, Kathleen Kulstad, Erik |
author_sort | Parilla, Barbara V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether trimester-specific D-dimer levels or the modified Wells score (MWS) is a useful risk stratification tool to exclude pregnant women at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) from diagnostic imaging. Study Design This is a prospective and retrospective cohort study. Pregnant women who underwent diagnostic imaging for suspected PE were prospectively enrolled. D-dimer serum levels were drawn, and a MWS was assigned. Pregnant women diagnosed with a PE before study launch who underwent diagnostic imaging and had a D-dimer level drawn were also evaluated. Results In this study, 17 patients were diagnosed with a PE and 42 patients had no PE on diagnostic imaging. Sixteen out of 17 patients with a PE versus 11 out of 42 without PE had an abnormal D-dimer level (p = 0.001). Four patients with a PE versus zero without a PE had an abnormal MWS (p = 0.005). The combination of a trimester-specific D-dimer level along with the MWS was abnormal in all 17 patients with a documented PE versus 11/42 (26.2%) patients without a documented PE (p = 0.001). Conclusion A combination of trimester-specific D-dimer levels along with a MWS can be used in pregnancy to triage women into a low-risk category for PE and thereby avoid radiation exposure in a majority of pregnant patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4844549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48445492016-04-26 Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? Parilla, Barbara V. Fournogerakis, Rachel Archer, Amy Sulo, Suela Laurent, Lisa Lee, Patricia Chhotani, Benazir Hesse, Kathleen Kulstad, Erik AJP Rep Article Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether trimester-specific D-dimer levels or the modified Wells score (MWS) is a useful risk stratification tool to exclude pregnant women at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) from diagnostic imaging. Study Design This is a prospective and retrospective cohort study. Pregnant women who underwent diagnostic imaging for suspected PE were prospectively enrolled. D-dimer serum levels were drawn, and a MWS was assigned. Pregnant women diagnosed with a PE before study launch who underwent diagnostic imaging and had a D-dimer level drawn were also evaluated. Results In this study, 17 patients were diagnosed with a PE and 42 patients had no PE on diagnostic imaging. Sixteen out of 17 patients with a PE versus 11 out of 42 without PE had an abnormal D-dimer level (p = 0.001). Four patients with a PE versus zero without a PE had an abnormal MWS (p = 0.005). The combination of a trimester-specific D-dimer level along with the MWS was abnormal in all 17 patients with a documented PE versus 11/42 (26.2%) patients without a documented PE (p = 0.001). Conclusion A combination of trimester-specific D-dimer levels along with a MWS can be used in pregnancy to triage women into a low-risk category for PE and thereby avoid radiation exposure in a majority of pregnant patients. Thieme Medical Publishers 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4844549/ /pubmed/27119048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582136 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Parilla, Barbara V. Fournogerakis, Rachel Archer, Amy Sulo, Suela Laurent, Lisa Lee, Patricia Chhotani, Benazir Hesse, Kathleen Kulstad, Erik Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? |
title | Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? |
title_full | Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? |
title_fullStr | Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? |
title_short | Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful? |
title_sort | diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: are biomarkers and clinical predictive models useful? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27119048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parillabarbarav diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful AT fournogerakisrachel diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful AT archeramy diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful AT sulosuela diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful AT laurentlisa diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful AT leepatricia diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful AT chhotanibenazir diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful AT hessekathleen diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful AT kulstaderik diagnosingpulmonaryembolisminpregnancyarebiomarkersandclinicalpredictivemodelsuseful |