Cargando…

Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?

OBJECTIVE: There are complications in stand-alone cage assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as cage subsidence and kyphosis. Here we report our clinical result on ACDF, comparing with stand-alone cages and with cervical plate system for degenerative cervical spine diseases....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Sang Youp, Kim, Hyun Woo, Lee, Cheol Young, Kim, Hong Rye, Park, Dong Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123025
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.13
_version_ 1782428812845252608
author Han, Sang Youp
Kim, Hyun Woo
Lee, Cheol Young
Kim, Hong Rye
Park, Dong Ho
author_facet Han, Sang Youp
Kim, Hyun Woo
Lee, Cheol Young
Kim, Hong Rye
Park, Dong Ho
author_sort Han, Sang Youp
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There are complications in stand-alone cage assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as cage subsidence and kyphosis. Here we report our clinical result on ACDF, comparing with stand-alone cages and with cervical plate system for degenerative cervical spine diseases. METHODS: Patients with degenerative cervical disease who were diagnosed and treated in Konyang University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2014 were included in this study. Patients who had operation in single level ACDF were selected. Patients scored the degree of pain using visual analog scale before and after the surgery. Subsidence was defined as ≥3-mm decrease of the segmental height, and cervical kyphosis was defined as progression of ≥5° at 12 months after postoperative follow-up compared to that measured at the immediate postoperative period. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were enrolled for this study. Forty-five patients were included in a cervical plate group and the others were in stand-alone cage group. There was no statistical difference in pain score between the 2 groups. Segmental subsidence was observed in 7 patients (15.6%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 13 patients (36.1%) in stand-alone cage group. Segmental kyphosis was observed in 4 patients (8.9%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 10 patients (27.8%) in stand-alone cage group. There was statistical difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in pain between 2 groups. But stand-alone case group showed higher incidence rate than plate-assisted cervical fusion group in segmental subsidence and cervical kyphosis. When designing cervical fusion, more attention should be given selecting the surgical technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4844655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48446552016-04-27 Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems? Han, Sang Youp Kim, Hyun Woo Lee, Cheol Young Kim, Hong Rye Park, Dong Ho Korean J Spine Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: There are complications in stand-alone cage assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as cage subsidence and kyphosis. Here we report our clinical result on ACDF, comparing with stand-alone cages and with cervical plate system for degenerative cervical spine diseases. METHODS: Patients with degenerative cervical disease who were diagnosed and treated in Konyang University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2014 were included in this study. Patients who had operation in single level ACDF were selected. Patients scored the degree of pain using visual analog scale before and after the surgery. Subsidence was defined as ≥3-mm decrease of the segmental height, and cervical kyphosis was defined as progression of ≥5° at 12 months after postoperative follow-up compared to that measured at the immediate postoperative period. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were enrolled for this study. Forty-five patients were included in a cervical plate group and the others were in stand-alone cage group. There was no statistical difference in pain score between the 2 groups. Segmental subsidence was observed in 7 patients (15.6%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 13 patients (36.1%) in stand-alone cage group. Segmental kyphosis was observed in 4 patients (8.9%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 10 patients (27.8%) in stand-alone cage group. There was statistical difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in pain between 2 groups. But stand-alone case group showed higher incidence rate than plate-assisted cervical fusion group in segmental subsidence and cervical kyphosis. When designing cervical fusion, more attention should be given selecting the surgical technique. The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2016-03 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4844655/ /pubmed/27123025 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.13 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Han, Sang Youp
Kim, Hyun Woo
Lee, Cheol Young
Kim, Hong Rye
Park, Dong Ho
Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?
title Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?
title_full Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?
title_fullStr Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?
title_full_unstemmed Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?
title_short Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?
title_sort stand-alone cages for anterior cervical fusion: are there no problems?
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123025
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.13
work_keys_str_mv AT hansangyoup standalonecagesforanteriorcervicalfusionaretherenoproblems
AT kimhyunwoo standalonecagesforanteriorcervicalfusionaretherenoproblems
AT leecheolyoung standalonecagesforanteriorcervicalfusionaretherenoproblems
AT kimhongrye standalonecagesforanteriorcervicalfusionaretherenoproblems
AT parkdongho standalonecagesforanteriorcervicalfusionaretherenoproblems