Cargando…

Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease may not achieve adequate low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) lowering on statin monotherapy, attributed partly to atherogenic dyslipidemia. More intensive LDL‐C–lowering therapy can be considered for these patients. A pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, Ngoc‐Anh, Tomassini, Joanne E., Tershakovec, Andrew M., Neff, David R., Wilson, Peter W. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26486166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001675
_version_ 1782428880638836736
author Le, Ngoc‐Anh
Tomassini, Joanne E.
Tershakovec, Andrew M.
Neff, David R.
Wilson, Peter W. F.
author_facet Le, Ngoc‐Anh
Tomassini, Joanne E.
Tershakovec, Andrew M.
Neff, David R.
Wilson, Peter W. F.
author_sort Le, Ngoc‐Anh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease may not achieve adequate low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) lowering on statin monotherapy, attributed partly to atherogenic dyslipidemia. More intensive LDL‐C–lowering therapy can be considered for these patients. A previous randomized, controlled study demonstrated greater LDL‐C lowering in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease who switched from simvastatin 20 mg (S20) or atorvastatin 10 mg (A10) to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg (ES10/20) therapy, compared with statin dose‐doubling (to S40 or A20) or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10). The effect of these regimens on novel biomarkers of atherogenic dyslipidemia (low‐ and high‐density lipoprotein particle number and lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase A2 [Lp‐PLA(2)]) was assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Treatment effects on low‐ and high‐density lipoprotein particle number (by NMR) and Lp‐PLA(2) (by ELISA) were evaluated using plasma samples available from 358 subjects in the study. Switching to ES10/20 reduced low‐density lipoprotein‐particle number numerically more than did statin dose‐doubling and was comparable with R10 (−133.3, −94.4, and −56.3 nmol/L, respectively; P>0.05). Increases in high‐density lipoprotein particle number were significantly greater with switches to ES10/20 versus statin dose‐doubling (1.5 and −0.5 μmol/L; P<0.05) and comparable with R10 (0.7 μmol/L; P>0.05). Percentages of patients attaining low‐density lipoprotein particle number levels <990 nmol/L were 62.4% for ES10/20, 54.1% for statin dose‐doubling, and 57.0% for R10. Switching to ES10/20 reduced Lp‐PLA(2) activity significantly more than did statin dose‐doubling (−28.0 versus −3.8 nmol/min per mL, P<0.05) and was comparable with R10 (−28.0 versus −18.6 nmol/min per mL; P>0.05); effects on Lp‐PLA(2) concentration were modest. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with dyslipidemia, switching from statins to combination ES10/20 therapy generally improved lipoprotein subclass profile and Lp‐PLA(2) activity more than did statin dose‐doubling and was comparable with R10, consistent with its lipid effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00862251.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4845107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48451072016-04-27 Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease Le, Ngoc‐Anh Tomassini, Joanne E. Tershakovec, Andrew M. Neff, David R. Wilson, Peter W. F. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease may not achieve adequate low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) lowering on statin monotherapy, attributed partly to atherogenic dyslipidemia. More intensive LDL‐C–lowering therapy can be considered for these patients. A previous randomized, controlled study demonstrated greater LDL‐C lowering in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease who switched from simvastatin 20 mg (S20) or atorvastatin 10 mg (A10) to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg (ES10/20) therapy, compared with statin dose‐doubling (to S40 or A20) or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10). The effect of these regimens on novel biomarkers of atherogenic dyslipidemia (low‐ and high‐density lipoprotein particle number and lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase A2 [Lp‐PLA(2)]) was assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Treatment effects on low‐ and high‐density lipoprotein particle number (by NMR) and Lp‐PLA(2) (by ELISA) were evaluated using plasma samples available from 358 subjects in the study. Switching to ES10/20 reduced low‐density lipoprotein‐particle number numerically more than did statin dose‐doubling and was comparable with R10 (−133.3, −94.4, and −56.3 nmol/L, respectively; P>0.05). Increases in high‐density lipoprotein particle number were significantly greater with switches to ES10/20 versus statin dose‐doubling (1.5 and −0.5 μmol/L; P<0.05) and comparable with R10 (0.7 μmol/L; P>0.05). Percentages of patients attaining low‐density lipoprotein particle number levels <990 nmol/L were 62.4% for ES10/20, 54.1% for statin dose‐doubling, and 57.0% for R10. Switching to ES10/20 reduced Lp‐PLA(2) activity significantly more than did statin dose‐doubling (−28.0 versus −3.8 nmol/min per mL, P<0.05) and was comparable with R10 (−28.0 versus −18.6 nmol/min per mL; P>0.05); effects on Lp‐PLA(2) concentration were modest. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with dyslipidemia, switching from statins to combination ES10/20 therapy generally improved lipoprotein subclass profile and Lp‐PLA(2) activity more than did statin dose‐doubling and was comparable with R10, consistent with its lipid effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00862251. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4845107/ /pubmed/26486166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001675 Text en © 2015 The Authors. [Ngoc‐Anh Le and Peter W. F. Wilson] and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. All rights reserved. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Le, Ngoc‐Anh
Tomassini, Joanne E.
Tershakovec, Andrew M.
Neff, David R.
Wilson, Peter W. F.
Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease
title Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease
title_full Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease
title_fullStr Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease
title_short Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease
title_sort effect of switching from statin monotherapy to ezetimibe/simvastatin combination therapy compared with other intensified lipid‐lowering strategies on lipoprotein subclasses in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26486166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001675
work_keys_str_mv AT lengocanh effectofswitchingfromstatinmonotherapytoezetimibesimvastatincombinationtherapycomparedwithotherintensifiedlipidloweringstrategiesonlipoproteinsubclassesindiabeticpatientswithsymptomaticcardiovasculardisease
AT tomassinijoannee effectofswitchingfromstatinmonotherapytoezetimibesimvastatincombinationtherapycomparedwithotherintensifiedlipidloweringstrategiesonlipoproteinsubclassesindiabeticpatientswithsymptomaticcardiovasculardisease
AT tershakovecandrewm effectofswitchingfromstatinmonotherapytoezetimibesimvastatincombinationtherapycomparedwithotherintensifiedlipidloweringstrategiesonlipoproteinsubclassesindiabeticpatientswithsymptomaticcardiovasculardisease
AT neffdavidr effectofswitchingfromstatinmonotherapytoezetimibesimvastatincombinationtherapycomparedwithotherintensifiedlipidloweringstrategiesonlipoproteinsubclassesindiabeticpatientswithsymptomaticcardiovasculardisease
AT wilsonpeterwf effectofswitchingfromstatinmonotherapytoezetimibesimvastatincombinationtherapycomparedwithotherintensifiedlipidloweringstrategiesonlipoproteinsubclassesindiabeticpatientswithsymptomaticcardiovasculardisease