Cargando…

Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND: Pain and discomfort related to endoscopy sessions can be alleviated by sedation, which minimizes anxiety and allows safe examination. For outpatient endoscopy, reliable short-term sedation without secondary effects is required. This study aimed to assess the effects of intravenous propof...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Qiongzhen, Zhou, Qinghe, Xiao, Wangpin, Zhou, Hongmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0463-y
_version_ 1782428917980725248
author Li, Qiongzhen
Zhou, Qinghe
Xiao, Wangpin
Zhou, Hongmei
author_facet Li, Qiongzhen
Zhou, Qinghe
Xiao, Wangpin
Zhou, Hongmei
author_sort Li, Qiongzhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain and discomfort related to endoscopy sessions can be alleviated by sedation, which minimizes anxiety and allows safe examination. For outpatient endoscopy, reliable short-term sedation without secondary effects is required. This study aimed to assess the effects of intravenous propofol rates on sedation in outpatients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: This randomized prospective study evaluated 300 outpatients submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients received propofol at 500, 1000 or 2000 ml/h. The primary outcome assessed was hypoxemia incidence. In addition, time to sedation and incidence of hypotension, deep sedation, extremity motor activity, cough, nausea, hiccough, and awareness were evaluated. RESULTS: Recovery time and incidence of hypoxemia, hypotension, and deep sedation were significantly increased in individuals treated at 2000 ml/h in comparison with values obtained for 500 and 1000 ml/h groups (P < 0.01). Compared with the 500 ml/h group, motor activity of the extremities, cough, nausea, hiccough, and awareness were significantly decreased and the mean scores for endoscopist’s and patients’ satisfaction were significantly increased in the 1000 and 2000 ml/h groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Propofol infused at 1000 ml/h appeared to be the most suitable infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR-TRC-14004786; Registration date: 2014-06-04
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4845313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48453132016-04-27 Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study Li, Qiongzhen Zhou, Qinghe Xiao, Wangpin Zhou, Hongmei BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Pain and discomfort related to endoscopy sessions can be alleviated by sedation, which minimizes anxiety and allows safe examination. For outpatient endoscopy, reliable short-term sedation without secondary effects is required. This study aimed to assess the effects of intravenous propofol rates on sedation in outpatients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: This randomized prospective study evaluated 300 outpatients submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients received propofol at 500, 1000 or 2000 ml/h. The primary outcome assessed was hypoxemia incidence. In addition, time to sedation and incidence of hypotension, deep sedation, extremity motor activity, cough, nausea, hiccough, and awareness were evaluated. RESULTS: Recovery time and incidence of hypoxemia, hypotension, and deep sedation were significantly increased in individuals treated at 2000 ml/h in comparison with values obtained for 500 and 1000 ml/h groups (P < 0.01). Compared with the 500 ml/h group, motor activity of the extremities, cough, nausea, hiccough, and awareness were significantly decreased and the mean scores for endoscopist’s and patients’ satisfaction were significantly increased in the 1000 and 2000 ml/h groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Propofol infused at 1000 ml/h appeared to be the most suitable infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR-TRC-14004786; Registration date: 2014-06-04 BioMed Central 2016-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4845313/ /pubmed/27117223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0463-y Text en © Li et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Qiongzhen
Zhou, Qinghe
Xiao, Wangpin
Zhou, Hongmei
Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study
title Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study
title_full Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study
title_fullStr Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study
title_short Determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study
title_sort determination of the appropriate propofol infusion rate for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy-a randomized prospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0463-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liqiongzhen determinationoftheappropriatepropofolinfusionrateforoutpatientuppergastrointestinalendoscopyarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT zhouqinghe determinationoftheappropriatepropofolinfusionrateforoutpatientuppergastrointestinalendoscopyarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT xiaowangpin determinationoftheappropriatepropofolinfusionrateforoutpatientuppergastrointestinalendoscopyarandomizedprospectivestudy
AT zhouhongmei determinationoftheappropriatepropofolinfusionrateforoutpatientuppergastrointestinalendoscopyarandomizedprospectivestudy