Cargando…
Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions, especially if they are affected by additional risk factors such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy, impaired renal function and intake of drugs with high risk potential. Apart from these clinical parameters, drug safety...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0447-6 |
_version_ | 1782428926755209216 |
---|---|
author | Stingl, Julia Carolin Kaumanns, Katharina Luise Claus, Katrin Lehmann, Marie-Louise Kastenmüller, Kathrin Bleckwenn, Markus Hartmann, Gunther Steffens, Michael Wirtz, Dorothee Leuchs, Ann-Kristin Benda, Norbert Meier, Florian Schöffski, Oliver Holdenrieder, Stefan Coch, Christoph Weckbecker, Klaus |
author_facet | Stingl, Julia Carolin Kaumanns, Katharina Luise Claus, Katrin Lehmann, Marie-Louise Kastenmüller, Kathrin Bleckwenn, Markus Hartmann, Gunther Steffens, Michael Wirtz, Dorothee Leuchs, Ann-Kristin Benda, Norbert Meier, Florian Schöffski, Oliver Holdenrieder, Stefan Coch, Christoph Weckbecker, Klaus |
author_sort | Stingl, Julia Carolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions, especially if they are affected by additional risk factors such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy, impaired renal function and intake of drugs with high risk potential. Apart from these clinical parameters, drug safety and efficacy can be influenced by pharmacogenetic factors. Evidence-based recommendations concerning drug-gene-combinations have been issued by international consortia and in drug labels. However, clinical benefit of providing information on individual patient factors in a comprehensive risk assessment aiming to reduce the occurrence and severity of adverse drug reactions is not evident. Purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of a concise individual risk information leaflet with standard information on risk factors for side effects. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial was designed as a prospective, two-arm, randomized, controlled, multicenter, pragmatic study. 960 elderly, multimorbid outpatients in general medicine are included if they take at least one high risk and one other long-term drug (polymedication). As high risk “index drugs” oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets were chosen because of their specific, objectively assessable side effects. Following randomization, test group patients receive an individualized risk assessment leaflet evaluating their personal data concerning bleeding- and thromboembolic-risk-scores, potential drug-drug-interactions, age, renal function and pharmacogenetic factors. Control group patients obtain a standardized leaflet only containing general information on these criteria. Follow-up period is 9 months for each patient. Primary endpoint is the occurrence of a thromboembolic/bleeding event or death. Secondary endpoints are other adverse drug reactions, hospital admissions, specialist referrals and medication changes due to adverse drug reactions, the patients’ adherence to medication regimen as well as health related quality of life, mortality and resulting costs. DISCUSSION: Despite extensive evidence of risk factors for adverse drug reactions, there are few prospective trial data about an individualized risk assessment including pharmacogenetic information to increase patient safety. By conducting a health economic analysis, we will evaluate if the application of an individualized drug therapy in daily routine is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00006256, date of registration 09/01/15. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4845354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48453542016-04-27 Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial Stingl, Julia Carolin Kaumanns, Katharina Luise Claus, Katrin Lehmann, Marie-Louise Kastenmüller, Kathrin Bleckwenn, Markus Hartmann, Gunther Steffens, Michael Wirtz, Dorothee Leuchs, Ann-Kristin Benda, Norbert Meier, Florian Schöffski, Oliver Holdenrieder, Stefan Coch, Christoph Weckbecker, Klaus BMC Fam Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions, especially if they are affected by additional risk factors such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy, impaired renal function and intake of drugs with high risk potential. Apart from these clinical parameters, drug safety and efficacy can be influenced by pharmacogenetic factors. Evidence-based recommendations concerning drug-gene-combinations have been issued by international consortia and in drug labels. However, clinical benefit of providing information on individual patient factors in a comprehensive risk assessment aiming to reduce the occurrence and severity of adverse drug reactions is not evident. Purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of a concise individual risk information leaflet with standard information on risk factors for side effects. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial was designed as a prospective, two-arm, randomized, controlled, multicenter, pragmatic study. 960 elderly, multimorbid outpatients in general medicine are included if they take at least one high risk and one other long-term drug (polymedication). As high risk “index drugs” oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets were chosen because of their specific, objectively assessable side effects. Following randomization, test group patients receive an individualized risk assessment leaflet evaluating their personal data concerning bleeding- and thromboembolic-risk-scores, potential drug-drug-interactions, age, renal function and pharmacogenetic factors. Control group patients obtain a standardized leaflet only containing general information on these criteria. Follow-up period is 9 months for each patient. Primary endpoint is the occurrence of a thromboembolic/bleeding event or death. Secondary endpoints are other adverse drug reactions, hospital admissions, specialist referrals and medication changes due to adverse drug reactions, the patients’ adherence to medication regimen as well as health related quality of life, mortality and resulting costs. DISCUSSION: Despite extensive evidence of risk factors for adverse drug reactions, there are few prospective trial data about an individualized risk assessment including pharmacogenetic information to increase patient safety. By conducting a health economic analysis, we will evaluate if the application of an individualized drug therapy in daily routine is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00006256, date of registration 09/01/15. BioMed Central 2016-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4845354/ /pubmed/27112273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0447-6 Text en © Stingl et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Stingl, Julia Carolin Kaumanns, Katharina Luise Claus, Katrin Lehmann, Marie-Louise Kastenmüller, Kathrin Bleckwenn, Markus Hartmann, Gunther Steffens, Michael Wirtz, Dorothee Leuchs, Ann-Kristin Benda, Norbert Meier, Florian Schöffski, Oliver Holdenrieder, Stefan Coch, Christoph Weckbecker, Klaus Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title | Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (idrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0447-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stingljuliacarolin individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kaumannskatharinaluise individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT clauskatrin individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lehmannmarielouise individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kastenmullerkathrin individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bleckwennmarkus individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hartmanngunther individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT steffensmichael individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wirtzdorothee individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leuchsannkristin individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bendanorbert individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meierflorian individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schoffskioliver individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT holdenriederstefan individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cochchristoph individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weckbeckerklaus individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial |