Cargando…

Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions, especially if they are affected by additional risk factors such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy, impaired renal function and intake of drugs with high risk potential. Apart from these clinical parameters, drug safety...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stingl, Julia Carolin, Kaumanns, Katharina Luise, Claus, Katrin, Lehmann, Marie-Louise, Kastenmüller, Kathrin, Bleckwenn, Markus, Hartmann, Gunther, Steffens, Michael, Wirtz, Dorothee, Leuchs, Ann-Kristin, Benda, Norbert, Meier, Florian, Schöffski, Oliver, Holdenrieder, Stefan, Coch, Christoph, Weckbecker, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0447-6
_version_ 1782428926755209216
author Stingl, Julia Carolin
Kaumanns, Katharina Luise
Claus, Katrin
Lehmann, Marie-Louise
Kastenmüller, Kathrin
Bleckwenn, Markus
Hartmann, Gunther
Steffens, Michael
Wirtz, Dorothee
Leuchs, Ann-Kristin
Benda, Norbert
Meier, Florian
Schöffski, Oliver
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Coch, Christoph
Weckbecker, Klaus
author_facet Stingl, Julia Carolin
Kaumanns, Katharina Luise
Claus, Katrin
Lehmann, Marie-Louise
Kastenmüller, Kathrin
Bleckwenn, Markus
Hartmann, Gunther
Steffens, Michael
Wirtz, Dorothee
Leuchs, Ann-Kristin
Benda, Norbert
Meier, Florian
Schöffski, Oliver
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Coch, Christoph
Weckbecker, Klaus
author_sort Stingl, Julia Carolin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions, especially if they are affected by additional risk factors such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy, impaired renal function and intake of drugs with high risk potential. Apart from these clinical parameters, drug safety and efficacy can be influenced by pharmacogenetic factors. Evidence-based recommendations concerning drug-gene-combinations have been issued by international consortia and in drug labels. However, clinical benefit of providing information on individual patient factors in a comprehensive risk assessment aiming to reduce the occurrence and severity of adverse drug reactions is not evident. Purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of a concise individual risk information leaflet with standard information on risk factors for side effects. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial was designed as a prospective, two-arm, randomized, controlled, multicenter, pragmatic study. 960 elderly, multimorbid outpatients in general medicine are included if they take at least one high risk and one other long-term drug (polymedication). As high risk “index drugs” oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets were chosen because of their specific, objectively assessable side effects. Following randomization, test group patients receive an individualized risk assessment leaflet evaluating their personal data concerning bleeding- and thromboembolic-risk-scores, potential drug-drug-interactions, age, renal function and pharmacogenetic factors. Control group patients obtain a standardized leaflet only containing general information on these criteria. Follow-up period is 9 months for each patient. Primary endpoint is the occurrence of a thromboembolic/bleeding event or death. Secondary endpoints are other adverse drug reactions, hospital admissions, specialist referrals and medication changes due to adverse drug reactions, the patients’ adherence to medication regimen as well as health related quality of life, mortality and resulting costs. DISCUSSION: Despite extensive evidence of risk factors for adverse drug reactions, there are few prospective trial data about an individualized risk assessment including pharmacogenetic information to increase patient safety. By conducting a health economic analysis, we will evaluate if the application of an individualized drug therapy in daily routine is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00006256, date of registration 09/01/15.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4845354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48453542016-04-27 Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial Stingl, Julia Carolin Kaumanns, Katharina Luise Claus, Katrin Lehmann, Marie-Louise Kastenmüller, Kathrin Bleckwenn, Markus Hartmann, Gunther Steffens, Michael Wirtz, Dorothee Leuchs, Ann-Kristin Benda, Norbert Meier, Florian Schöffski, Oliver Holdenrieder, Stefan Coch, Christoph Weckbecker, Klaus BMC Fam Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions, especially if they are affected by additional risk factors such as multimorbidity, polypharmacy, impaired renal function and intake of drugs with high risk potential. Apart from these clinical parameters, drug safety and efficacy can be influenced by pharmacogenetic factors. Evidence-based recommendations concerning drug-gene-combinations have been issued by international consortia and in drug labels. However, clinical benefit of providing information on individual patient factors in a comprehensive risk assessment aiming to reduce the occurrence and severity of adverse drug reactions is not evident. Purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of a concise individual risk information leaflet with standard information on risk factors for side effects. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial was designed as a prospective, two-arm, randomized, controlled, multicenter, pragmatic study. 960 elderly, multimorbid outpatients in general medicine are included if they take at least one high risk and one other long-term drug (polymedication). As high risk “index drugs” oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets were chosen because of their specific, objectively assessable side effects. Following randomization, test group patients receive an individualized risk assessment leaflet evaluating their personal data concerning bleeding- and thromboembolic-risk-scores, potential drug-drug-interactions, age, renal function and pharmacogenetic factors. Control group patients obtain a standardized leaflet only containing general information on these criteria. Follow-up period is 9 months for each patient. Primary endpoint is the occurrence of a thromboembolic/bleeding event or death. Secondary endpoints are other adverse drug reactions, hospital admissions, specialist referrals and medication changes due to adverse drug reactions, the patients’ adherence to medication regimen as well as health related quality of life, mortality and resulting costs. DISCUSSION: Despite extensive evidence of risk factors for adverse drug reactions, there are few prospective trial data about an individualized risk assessment including pharmacogenetic information to increase patient safety. By conducting a health economic analysis, we will evaluate if the application of an individualized drug therapy in daily routine is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00006256, date of registration 09/01/15. BioMed Central 2016-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4845354/ /pubmed/27112273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0447-6 Text en © Stingl et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Stingl, Julia Carolin
Kaumanns, Katharina Luise
Claus, Katrin
Lehmann, Marie-Louise
Kastenmüller, Kathrin
Bleckwenn, Markus
Hartmann, Gunther
Steffens, Michael
Wirtz, Dorothee
Leuchs, Ann-Kristin
Benda, Norbert
Meier, Florian
Schöffski, Oliver
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Coch, Christoph
Weckbecker, Klaus
Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_full Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_short Individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (IDrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_sort individualized versus standardized risk assessment in patients at high risk for adverse drug reactions (idrug) – study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0447-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stingljuliacarolin individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kaumannskatharinaluise individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT clauskatrin individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lehmannmarielouise individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kastenmullerkathrin individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bleckwennmarkus individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hartmanngunther individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT steffensmichael individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wirtzdorothee individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leuchsannkristin individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bendanorbert individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meierflorian individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schoffskioliver individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT holdenriederstefan individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cochchristoph individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weckbeckerklaus individualizedversusstandardizedriskassessmentinpatientsathighriskforadversedrugreactionsidrugstudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial