Cargando…

“Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of combined occlusion and atropine therapy (COAT) and augmented part-time patching for the treatment of unilateral refractory/residual amblyopia. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study evaluated children between 4 and 11 years with refractory/residual amblyopia who we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sachdeva, Virender, Mittal, Vaibhev, Gupta, Varun, Gunturu, Rekha, Kekunnaya, Ramesh, Chandrasekharan, Anjali, Chabblani, Preeti Patil, Rao, Harsha L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27162453
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.175892
_version_ 1782428979500679168
author Sachdeva, Virender
Mittal, Vaibhev
Gupta, Varun
Gunturu, Rekha
Kekunnaya, Ramesh
Chandrasekharan, Anjali
Chabblani, Preeti Patil
Rao, Harsha L.
author_facet Sachdeva, Virender
Mittal, Vaibhev
Gupta, Varun
Gunturu, Rekha
Kekunnaya, Ramesh
Chandrasekharan, Anjali
Chabblani, Preeti Patil
Rao, Harsha L.
author_sort Sachdeva, Virender
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of combined occlusion and atropine therapy (COAT) and augmented part-time patching for the treatment of unilateral refractory/residual amblyopia. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study evaluated children between 4 and 11 years with refractory/residual amblyopia who were treated with either additional atropine (COAT group) or increased hours of patching (augmented group). Data were collected on improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units) at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: There were 19 children in the COAT group and 17 children in the augmented group. The baseline BCVA of the amblyopic eye was 0.79 ± 0.36 logMAR in the COAT group and 0.72 ± 0.26 logMAR in augmented group. Children were statistically significantly younger in the COAT group (6.4 ± 2.2 years) compared to the augmented group (8.6 ± 3.3 years, P = 0.02). The mean duration of follow-up was statistically significantly longer in the augmented group (20.2 COAT group; 13.9 months augmented group) (P = 0.03). Compliance was similar in both groups. LogMAR BCVA (adjusted for difference in age and baseline BCVA) was statistically significantly better in the COAT group (0.56 ± 0.04) compared to the augmented group (0.80 ± 0.04) at 3 months (P = 0.000); 6 months (COAT group, 0.50 ± 0.04 vs. augmented group, 0.74 ± 0.04; P = 0.04) and at 1 year (COAT group, 0.42 ± 0.04 vs. augmented group, 0.67 ± 0.04, P = 0.000). There was statistically significantly greater improvement in logMAR BCVA at 6 months in COAT group (0.26 ± 0.15) compared to the augmented group (0.02 ± 0.14), (P = 0.0002). Age, gender, pretreatment BCVA, duration of follow-up, or compliance to patching did not affect improvement in BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: COAT may result in greater improvement in BCVA than augmented part-time patching in children with unilateral residual/refractory amblyopia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4845619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48456192016-05-09 “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study Sachdeva, Virender Mittal, Vaibhev Gupta, Varun Gunturu, Rekha Kekunnaya, Ramesh Chandrasekharan, Anjali Chabblani, Preeti Patil Rao, Harsha L. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of combined occlusion and atropine therapy (COAT) and augmented part-time patching for the treatment of unilateral refractory/residual amblyopia. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study evaluated children between 4 and 11 years with refractory/residual amblyopia who were treated with either additional atropine (COAT group) or increased hours of patching (augmented group). Data were collected on improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units) at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: There were 19 children in the COAT group and 17 children in the augmented group. The baseline BCVA of the amblyopic eye was 0.79 ± 0.36 logMAR in the COAT group and 0.72 ± 0.26 logMAR in augmented group. Children were statistically significantly younger in the COAT group (6.4 ± 2.2 years) compared to the augmented group (8.6 ± 3.3 years, P = 0.02). The mean duration of follow-up was statistically significantly longer in the augmented group (20.2 COAT group; 13.9 months augmented group) (P = 0.03). Compliance was similar in both groups. LogMAR BCVA (adjusted for difference in age and baseline BCVA) was statistically significantly better in the COAT group (0.56 ± 0.04) compared to the augmented group (0.80 ± 0.04) at 3 months (P = 0.000); 6 months (COAT group, 0.50 ± 0.04 vs. augmented group, 0.74 ± 0.04; P = 0.04) and at 1 year (COAT group, 0.42 ± 0.04 vs. augmented group, 0.67 ± 0.04, P = 0.000). There was statistically significantly greater improvement in logMAR BCVA at 6 months in COAT group (0.26 ± 0.15) compared to the augmented group (0.02 ± 0.14), (P = 0.0002). Age, gender, pretreatment BCVA, duration of follow-up, or compliance to patching did not affect improvement in BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: COAT may result in greater improvement in BCVA than augmented part-time patching in children with unilateral residual/refractory amblyopia. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4845619/ /pubmed/27162453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.175892 Text en Copyright: © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sachdeva, Virender
Mittal, Vaibhev
Gupta, Varun
Gunturu, Rekha
Kekunnaya, Ramesh
Chandrasekharan, Anjali
Chabblani, Preeti Patil
Rao, Harsha L.
“Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study
title “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study
title_full “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study
title_short “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study
title_sort “combined occlusion and atropine therapy” versus “augmented part-time patching” in children with refractory/residual amblyopia: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27162453
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.175892
work_keys_str_mv AT sachdevavirender combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy
AT mittalvaibhev combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy
AT guptavarun combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy
AT guntururekha combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy
AT kekunnayaramesh combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy
AT chandrasekharananjali combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy
AT chabblanipreetipatil combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy
AT raoharshal combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy