Cargando…
“Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of combined occlusion and atropine therapy (COAT) and augmented part-time patching for the treatment of unilateral refractory/residual amblyopia. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study evaluated children between 4 and 11 years with refractory/residual amblyopia who we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27162453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.175892 |
_version_ | 1782428979500679168 |
---|---|
author | Sachdeva, Virender Mittal, Vaibhev Gupta, Varun Gunturu, Rekha Kekunnaya, Ramesh Chandrasekharan, Anjali Chabblani, Preeti Patil Rao, Harsha L. |
author_facet | Sachdeva, Virender Mittal, Vaibhev Gupta, Varun Gunturu, Rekha Kekunnaya, Ramesh Chandrasekharan, Anjali Chabblani, Preeti Patil Rao, Harsha L. |
author_sort | Sachdeva, Virender |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of combined occlusion and atropine therapy (COAT) and augmented part-time patching for the treatment of unilateral refractory/residual amblyopia. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study evaluated children between 4 and 11 years with refractory/residual amblyopia who were treated with either additional atropine (COAT group) or increased hours of patching (augmented group). Data were collected on improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units) at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: There were 19 children in the COAT group and 17 children in the augmented group. The baseline BCVA of the amblyopic eye was 0.79 ± 0.36 logMAR in the COAT group and 0.72 ± 0.26 logMAR in augmented group. Children were statistically significantly younger in the COAT group (6.4 ± 2.2 years) compared to the augmented group (8.6 ± 3.3 years, P = 0.02). The mean duration of follow-up was statistically significantly longer in the augmented group (20.2 COAT group; 13.9 months augmented group) (P = 0.03). Compliance was similar in both groups. LogMAR BCVA (adjusted for difference in age and baseline BCVA) was statistically significantly better in the COAT group (0.56 ± 0.04) compared to the augmented group (0.80 ± 0.04) at 3 months (P = 0.000); 6 months (COAT group, 0.50 ± 0.04 vs. augmented group, 0.74 ± 0.04; P = 0.04) and at 1 year (COAT group, 0.42 ± 0.04 vs. augmented group, 0.67 ± 0.04, P = 0.000). There was statistically significantly greater improvement in logMAR BCVA at 6 months in COAT group (0.26 ± 0.15) compared to the augmented group (0.02 ± 0.14), (P = 0.0002). Age, gender, pretreatment BCVA, duration of follow-up, or compliance to patching did not affect improvement in BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: COAT may result in greater improvement in BCVA than augmented part-time patching in children with unilateral residual/refractory amblyopia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4845619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48456192016-05-09 “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study Sachdeva, Virender Mittal, Vaibhev Gupta, Varun Gunturu, Rekha Kekunnaya, Ramesh Chandrasekharan, Anjali Chabblani, Preeti Patil Rao, Harsha L. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of combined occlusion and atropine therapy (COAT) and augmented part-time patching for the treatment of unilateral refractory/residual amblyopia. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study evaluated children between 4 and 11 years with refractory/residual amblyopia who were treated with either additional atropine (COAT group) or increased hours of patching (augmented group). Data were collected on improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units) at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: There were 19 children in the COAT group and 17 children in the augmented group. The baseline BCVA of the amblyopic eye was 0.79 ± 0.36 logMAR in the COAT group and 0.72 ± 0.26 logMAR in augmented group. Children were statistically significantly younger in the COAT group (6.4 ± 2.2 years) compared to the augmented group (8.6 ± 3.3 years, P = 0.02). The mean duration of follow-up was statistically significantly longer in the augmented group (20.2 COAT group; 13.9 months augmented group) (P = 0.03). Compliance was similar in both groups. LogMAR BCVA (adjusted for difference in age and baseline BCVA) was statistically significantly better in the COAT group (0.56 ± 0.04) compared to the augmented group (0.80 ± 0.04) at 3 months (P = 0.000); 6 months (COAT group, 0.50 ± 0.04 vs. augmented group, 0.74 ± 0.04; P = 0.04) and at 1 year (COAT group, 0.42 ± 0.04 vs. augmented group, 0.67 ± 0.04, P = 0.000). There was statistically significantly greater improvement in logMAR BCVA at 6 months in COAT group (0.26 ± 0.15) compared to the augmented group (0.02 ± 0.14), (P = 0.0002). Age, gender, pretreatment BCVA, duration of follow-up, or compliance to patching did not affect improvement in BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: COAT may result in greater improvement in BCVA than augmented part-time patching in children with unilateral residual/refractory amblyopia. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4845619/ /pubmed/27162453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.175892 Text en Copyright: © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sachdeva, Virender Mittal, Vaibhev Gupta, Varun Gunturu, Rekha Kekunnaya, Ramesh Chandrasekharan, Anjali Chabblani, Preeti Patil Rao, Harsha L. “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study |
title | “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study |
title_full | “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study |
title_short | “Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy” Versus “Augmented Part-Time Patching” in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | “combined occlusion and atropine therapy” versus “augmented part-time patching” in children with refractory/residual amblyopia: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27162453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.175892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sachdevavirender combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy AT mittalvaibhev combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy AT guptavarun combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy AT guntururekha combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy AT kekunnayaramesh combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy AT chandrasekharananjali combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy AT chabblanipreetipatil combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy AT raoharshal combinedocclusionandatropinetherapyversusaugmentedparttimepatchinginchildrenwithrefractoryresidualamblyopiaapilotstudy |