Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research

Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of evidence from literature reviews focused on a specific theme. Evidence synthesis is performed with qualitative assessments and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically covering statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analyses. These me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roever, Leonardo, Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2016
Materias:
Review Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142793
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160052
_version_ 1782428989423353856
author Roever, Leonardo
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
author_facet Roever, Leonardo
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
author_sort Roever, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of evidence from literature reviews focused on a specific theme. Evidence synthesis is performed with qualitative assessments and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically covering statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analyses. These methods include adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and mixed-treatment comparison. These tools allow synthesis of evidence and comparison of effectiveness in cardiovascular research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4845707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48457072016-04-27 Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research Roever, Leonardo Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe Arq Bras Cardiol Review Article Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of evidence from literature reviews focused on a specific theme. Evidence synthesis is performed with qualitative assessments and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically covering statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analyses. These methods include adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and mixed-treatment comparison. These tools allow synthesis of evidence and comparison of effectiveness in cardiovascular research. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4845707/ /pubmed/27142793 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160052 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Roever, Leonardo
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research
title Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research
title_full Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research
title_fullStr Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research
title_full_unstemmed Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research
title_short Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research
title_sort network meta-analysis to synthesize evidence for decision making in cardiovascular research
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142793
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160052
work_keys_str_mv AT roeverleonardo networkmetaanalysistosynthesizeevidencefordecisionmakingincardiovascularresearch
AT biondizoccaigiuseppe networkmetaanalysistosynthesizeevidencefordecisionmakingincardiovascularresearch

Ejemplares similares