Cargando…

Comparison of Methyl-capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples

Interindividual variability in the epigenome has gained tremendous attention for its potential in pathophysiological investigation, disease diagnosis, and evaluation of clinical intervention. DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic mark in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) as it can b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teh, Ai Ling, Pan, Hong, Lin, Xinyi, Lim, Yubin Ives, Patro, Chinari Pawan Kumar, Cheong, Clara Yujing, Gong, Min, MacIsaac, Julia L., Kwoh, Chee-Keong, Meaney, Michael J., Kobor, Michael S., Chong, Yap-Seng, Gluckman, Peter D., Holbrook, Joanna D., Karnani, Neerja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2015.1132136
_version_ 1782429039168847872
author Teh, Ai Ling
Pan, Hong
Lin, Xinyi
Lim, Yubin Ives
Patro, Chinari Pawan Kumar
Cheong, Clara Yujing
Gong, Min
MacIsaac, Julia L.
Kwoh, Chee-Keong
Meaney, Michael J.
Kobor, Michael S.
Chong, Yap-Seng
Gluckman, Peter D.
Holbrook, Joanna D.
Karnani, Neerja
author_facet Teh, Ai Ling
Pan, Hong
Lin, Xinyi
Lim, Yubin Ives
Patro, Chinari Pawan Kumar
Cheong, Clara Yujing
Gong, Min
MacIsaac, Julia L.
Kwoh, Chee-Keong
Meaney, Michael J.
Kobor, Michael S.
Chong, Yap-Seng
Gluckman, Peter D.
Holbrook, Joanna D.
Karnani, Neerja
author_sort Teh, Ai Ling
collection PubMed
description Interindividual variability in the epigenome has gained tremendous attention for its potential in pathophysiological investigation, disease diagnosis, and evaluation of clinical intervention. DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic mark in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) as it can be detected from limited starting material. Infinium 450K methylation array is the most popular platform for high-throughput profiling of this mark in clinical samples, as it is cost-effective and requires small amounts of DNA. However, this method suffers from low genome coverage and errors introduced by probe cross-hybridization. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing can overcome these limitations but elevates the costs tremendously. Methyl-Capture Sequencing (MC Seq) is an attractive intermediate solution to increase the methylome coverage in large sample sets. Here we first demonstrate that MC Seq can be employed using DNA amounts comparable to the amounts used for Infinium 450K. Second, to provide guidance when choosing between the 2 platforms for EWAS, we evaluate and compare MC Seq and Infinium 450K in terms of coverage, technical variation, and concordance of methylation calls in clinical samples. Last, since the focus in EWAS is to study interindividual variation, we demonstrate the utility of MC Seq in studying interindividual variation in subjects from different ethnicities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4846133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48461332016-05-09 Comparison of Methyl-capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples Teh, Ai Ling Pan, Hong Lin, Xinyi Lim, Yubin Ives Patro, Chinari Pawan Kumar Cheong, Clara Yujing Gong, Min MacIsaac, Julia L. Kwoh, Chee-Keong Meaney, Michael J. Kobor, Michael S. Chong, Yap-Seng Gluckman, Peter D. Holbrook, Joanna D. Karnani, Neerja Epigenetics Research Paper Interindividual variability in the epigenome has gained tremendous attention for its potential in pathophysiological investigation, disease diagnosis, and evaluation of clinical intervention. DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic mark in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) as it can be detected from limited starting material. Infinium 450K methylation array is the most popular platform for high-throughput profiling of this mark in clinical samples, as it is cost-effective and requires small amounts of DNA. However, this method suffers from low genome coverage and errors introduced by probe cross-hybridization. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing can overcome these limitations but elevates the costs tremendously. Methyl-Capture Sequencing (MC Seq) is an attractive intermediate solution to increase the methylome coverage in large sample sets. Here we first demonstrate that MC Seq can be employed using DNA amounts comparable to the amounts used for Infinium 450K. Second, to provide guidance when choosing between the 2 platforms for EWAS, we evaluate and compare MC Seq and Infinium 450K in terms of coverage, technical variation, and concordance of methylation calls in clinical samples. Last, since the focus in EWAS is to study interindividual variation, we demonstrate the utility of MC Seq in studying interindividual variation in subjects from different ethnicities. Taylor & Francis 2016-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4846133/ /pubmed/26786415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2015.1132136 Text en © 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Teh, Ai Ling
Pan, Hong
Lin, Xinyi
Lim, Yubin Ives
Patro, Chinari Pawan Kumar
Cheong, Clara Yujing
Gong, Min
MacIsaac, Julia L.
Kwoh, Chee-Keong
Meaney, Michael J.
Kobor, Michael S.
Chong, Yap-Seng
Gluckman, Peter D.
Holbrook, Joanna D.
Karnani, Neerja
Comparison of Methyl-capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples
title Comparison of Methyl-capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples
title_full Comparison of Methyl-capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples
title_fullStr Comparison of Methyl-capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Methyl-capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples
title_short Comparison of Methyl-capture Sequencing vs. Infinium 450K methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples
title_sort comparison of methyl-capture sequencing vs. infinium 450k methylation array for methylome analysis in clinical samples
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2015.1132136
work_keys_str_mv AT tehailing comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT panhong comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT linxinyi comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT limyubinives comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT patrochinaripawankumar comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT cheongclarayujing comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT gongmin comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT macisaacjulial comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT kwohcheekeong comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT meaneymichaelj comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT kobormichaels comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT chongyapseng comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT gluckmanpeterd comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT holbrookjoannad comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples
AT karnanineerja comparisonofmethylcapturesequencingvsinfinium450kmethylationarrayformethylomeanalysisinclinicalsamples