Cargando…

Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Management of urolithiasis in a solitary functioning kidney can be clinically challenging. The aim of this article was to review the outcomes of URS for patients with stone disease in a solitary kidney and critically appraise the existing evidence and outcome reporting standards. MATER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Patrick, Rai, Bhavan Prasad, Somani, Bhaskar K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123332
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.663
_version_ 1782429087651856384
author Jones, Patrick
Rai, Bhavan Prasad
Somani, Bhaskar K.
author_facet Jones, Patrick
Rai, Bhavan Prasad
Somani, Bhaskar K.
author_sort Jones, Patrick
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Management of urolithiasis in a solitary functioning kidney can be clinically challenging. The aim of this article was to review the outcomes of URS for patients with stone disease in a solitary kidney and critically appraise the existing evidence and outcome reporting standards. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in line with PRISMA checklist and Cochrane guidelines between January 1980 and February 2015. Our inclusion criteria were all English language articles reporting on a minimum of 10 patients with a solitary kidney undergoing ureteroscopy for stone disease. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (mean age 50 years) underwent URS for stones in solitary kidney. For a mean stone size of 16.8 mm (range: 5–60 mm) and 1.23 procedures/patient, the mean stone free rate was 87%. No significant change in renal function was recorded in any of the studies although a transient elevation in creatinine was reported in 10 (8.6%) patients. A total of 33 (28%) complications were recorded a majority (n = 21) of which were Clavien grade I. The Clavien grade II/III complications as reported by authors were urosepsis, steinstrasse and renal colic. None of the procedures required conversion to open surgery with no cases of renal haematoma or ureteric perforation. CONCLUSIONS: This contemporary review highlights URS as a viable treatment option for stone disease in patients with a solitary kidney. It is associated with superior clearance rates to SWL and fewer high-risk complications compared to PCNL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4846718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48467182016-04-27 Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review Jones, Patrick Rai, Bhavan Prasad Somani, Bhaskar K. Cent European J Urol Review Paper INTRODUCTION: Management of urolithiasis in a solitary functioning kidney can be clinically challenging. The aim of this article was to review the outcomes of URS for patients with stone disease in a solitary kidney and critically appraise the existing evidence and outcome reporting standards. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in line with PRISMA checklist and Cochrane guidelines between January 1980 and February 2015. Our inclusion criteria were all English language articles reporting on a minimum of 10 patients with a solitary kidney undergoing ureteroscopy for stone disease. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (mean age 50 years) underwent URS for stones in solitary kidney. For a mean stone size of 16.8 mm (range: 5–60 mm) and 1.23 procedures/patient, the mean stone free rate was 87%. No significant change in renal function was recorded in any of the studies although a transient elevation in creatinine was reported in 10 (8.6%) patients. A total of 33 (28%) complications were recorded a majority (n = 21) of which were Clavien grade I. The Clavien grade II/III complications as reported by authors were urosepsis, steinstrasse and renal colic. None of the procedures required conversion to open surgery with no cases of renal haematoma or ureteric perforation. CONCLUSIONS: This contemporary review highlights URS as a viable treatment option for stone disease in patients with a solitary kidney. It is associated with superior clearance rates to SWL and fewer high-risk complications compared to PCNL. Polish Urological Association 2016-01-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4846718/ /pubmed/27123332 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.663 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Jones, Patrick
Rai, Bhavan Prasad
Somani, Bhaskar K.
Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review
title Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review
title_full Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review
title_fullStr Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review
title_short Outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review
title_sort outcomes of ureteroscopy for patients with stones in a solitary kidney: evidence from a systematic review
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123332
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.663
work_keys_str_mv AT jonespatrick outcomesofureteroscopyforpatientswithstonesinasolitarykidneyevidencefromasystematicreview
AT raibhavanprasad outcomesofureteroscopyforpatientswithstonesinasolitarykidneyevidencefromasystematicreview
AT somanibhaskark outcomesofureteroscopyforpatientswithstonesinasolitarykidneyevidencefromasystematicreview