Cargando…

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience

INTRODUCTION: In 2008, our department introduced a modified technique of laparoscopic radical cystectomy in which the prostatic capsule is spared in selected patients with bladder cancer. The different series published are mostly using the standard open procedure. The aim of this study is to describ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rivas, Juan Gómez, Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y, Gómez, Ángel Tabernero, Alvarez-Maestro, Mario, Sebastián, Jesús Díez, Ledo, Jesús Cisneros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123320
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.723
_version_ 1782429089681899520
author Rivas, Juan Gómez
Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y
Gómez, Ángel Tabernero
Alvarez-Maestro, Mario
Sebastián, Jesús Díez
Ledo, Jesús Cisneros
author_facet Rivas, Juan Gómez
Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y
Gómez, Ángel Tabernero
Alvarez-Maestro, Mario
Sebastián, Jesús Díez
Ledo, Jesús Cisneros
author_sort Rivas, Juan Gómez
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In 2008, our department introduced a modified technique of laparoscopic radical cystectomy in which the prostatic capsule is spared in selected patients with bladder cancer. The different series published are mostly using the standard open procedure. The aim of this study is to describe this technique using the laparoscopic approach and present our preliminary results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study includes 20 patients selected by clinical analysis and imaging criteria operated using laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing at our department in the period between 2008 and 2012. RESULTS: Patient mean age was 58 years. Mean operative time was 390 minutes. Median follow-up was 36 months. No patient had bladder cancer recurrence. Only one patient died of disease progression, as the pathological findings was a pT3 pN1 Mx. Mean PSA before surgery: 1.3 ng/ml (03–2), mean PSA after surgery 1.0 ng/ml (0.08–1.7). No patients had prostate cancer recurrence. Satisfactory daytime and night-time continence was achieved. 90% of patients have sexual function preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate-sparing radical cystectomy remains one of the most controversial topics in urology today. The laparoscopic approach could be an alternative to conventional radical cystoprostatectomy in well selected patients, done in experienced institutions in order to find better functional results, with a low disease progression and recurrence rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4846727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48467272016-04-27 Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience Rivas, Juan Gómez Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y Gómez, Ángel Tabernero Alvarez-Maestro, Mario Sebastián, Jesús Díez Ledo, Jesús Cisneros Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: In 2008, our department introduced a modified technique of laparoscopic radical cystectomy in which the prostatic capsule is spared in selected patients with bladder cancer. The different series published are mostly using the standard open procedure. The aim of this study is to describe this technique using the laparoscopic approach and present our preliminary results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study includes 20 patients selected by clinical analysis and imaging criteria operated using laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing at our department in the period between 2008 and 2012. RESULTS: Patient mean age was 58 years. Mean operative time was 390 minutes. Median follow-up was 36 months. No patient had bladder cancer recurrence. Only one patient died of disease progression, as the pathological findings was a pT3 pN1 Mx. Mean PSA before surgery: 1.3 ng/ml (03–2), mean PSA after surgery 1.0 ng/ml (0.08–1.7). No patients had prostate cancer recurrence. Satisfactory daytime and night-time continence was achieved. 90% of patients have sexual function preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate-sparing radical cystectomy remains one of the most controversial topics in urology today. The laparoscopic approach could be an alternative to conventional radical cystoprostatectomy in well selected patients, done in experienced institutions in order to find better functional results, with a low disease progression and recurrence rate. Polish Urological Association 2016-01-18 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4846727/ /pubmed/27123320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.723 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rivas, Juan Gómez
Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y
Gómez, Ángel Tabernero
Alvarez-Maestro, Mario
Sebastián, Jesús Díez
Ledo, Jesús Cisneros
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience
title Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience
title_full Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience
title_short Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience
title_sort laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. initial experience
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123320
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.723
work_keys_str_mv AT rivasjuangomez laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience
AT gregoriosergioalonsoy laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience
AT gomezangeltabernero laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience
AT alvarezmaestromario laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience
AT sebastianjesusdiez laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience
AT ledojesuscisneros laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience