Cargando…
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience
INTRODUCTION: In 2008, our department introduced a modified technique of laparoscopic radical cystectomy in which the prostatic capsule is spared in selected patients with bladder cancer. The different series published are mostly using the standard open procedure. The aim of this study is to describ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.723 |
_version_ | 1782429089681899520 |
---|---|
author | Rivas, Juan Gómez Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y Gómez, Ángel Tabernero Alvarez-Maestro, Mario Sebastián, Jesús Díez Ledo, Jesús Cisneros |
author_facet | Rivas, Juan Gómez Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y Gómez, Ángel Tabernero Alvarez-Maestro, Mario Sebastián, Jesús Díez Ledo, Jesús Cisneros |
author_sort | Rivas, Juan Gómez |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In 2008, our department introduced a modified technique of laparoscopic radical cystectomy in which the prostatic capsule is spared in selected patients with bladder cancer. The different series published are mostly using the standard open procedure. The aim of this study is to describe this technique using the laparoscopic approach and present our preliminary results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study includes 20 patients selected by clinical analysis and imaging criteria operated using laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing at our department in the period between 2008 and 2012. RESULTS: Patient mean age was 58 years. Mean operative time was 390 minutes. Median follow-up was 36 months. No patient had bladder cancer recurrence. Only one patient died of disease progression, as the pathological findings was a pT3 pN1 Mx. Mean PSA before surgery: 1.3 ng/ml (03–2), mean PSA after surgery 1.0 ng/ml (0.08–1.7). No patients had prostate cancer recurrence. Satisfactory daytime and night-time continence was achieved. 90% of patients have sexual function preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate-sparing radical cystectomy remains one of the most controversial topics in urology today. The laparoscopic approach could be an alternative to conventional radical cystoprostatectomy in well selected patients, done in experienced institutions in order to find better functional results, with a low disease progression and recurrence rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4846727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48467272016-04-27 Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience Rivas, Juan Gómez Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y Gómez, Ángel Tabernero Alvarez-Maestro, Mario Sebastián, Jesús Díez Ledo, Jesús Cisneros Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: In 2008, our department introduced a modified technique of laparoscopic radical cystectomy in which the prostatic capsule is spared in selected patients with bladder cancer. The different series published are mostly using the standard open procedure. The aim of this study is to describe this technique using the laparoscopic approach and present our preliminary results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study includes 20 patients selected by clinical analysis and imaging criteria operated using laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing at our department in the period between 2008 and 2012. RESULTS: Patient mean age was 58 years. Mean operative time was 390 minutes. Median follow-up was 36 months. No patient had bladder cancer recurrence. Only one patient died of disease progression, as the pathological findings was a pT3 pN1 Mx. Mean PSA before surgery: 1.3 ng/ml (03–2), mean PSA after surgery 1.0 ng/ml (0.08–1.7). No patients had prostate cancer recurrence. Satisfactory daytime and night-time continence was achieved. 90% of patients have sexual function preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate-sparing radical cystectomy remains one of the most controversial topics in urology today. The laparoscopic approach could be an alternative to conventional radical cystoprostatectomy in well selected patients, done in experienced institutions in order to find better functional results, with a low disease progression and recurrence rate. Polish Urological Association 2016-01-18 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4846727/ /pubmed/27123320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.723 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Rivas, Juan Gómez Gregorio, Sergio Alonso y Gómez, Ángel Tabernero Alvarez-Maestro, Mario Sebastián, Jesús Díez Ledo, Jesús Cisneros Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience |
title | Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience |
title_full | Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience |
title_short | Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience |
title_sort | laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. initial experience |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4846727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27123320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rivasjuangomez laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience AT gregoriosergioalonsoy laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience AT gomezangeltabernero laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience AT alvarezmaestromario laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience AT sebastianjesusdiez laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience AT ledojesuscisneros laparoscopicradicalcystectomywithprostatecapsulesparinginitialexperience |