Cargando…
Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of Australian practice
INTRODUCTION: Exercise training is a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), however, little information exists regarding the specific exercise interventions currently provided for coronary heart disease in Australian practice. We aimed to analyse the current status of exercise-based CR servi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2015-000374 |
_version_ | 1782429154729263104 |
---|---|
author | Abell, Bridget Glasziou, Paul Briffa, Tom Hoffmann, Tammy |
author_facet | Abell, Bridget Glasziou, Paul Briffa, Tom Hoffmann, Tammy |
author_sort | Abell, Bridget |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Exercise training is a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), however, little information exists regarding the specific exercise interventions currently provided for coronary heart disease in Australian practice. We aimed to analyse the current status of exercise-based CR services across Australia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Australian sites offering exercise-based CR were identified from publically available directories. All sites were invited by email to participate in an online Survey Monkey questionnaire between October 2014 and March 2015, with reminders via email and phone follow-up. Questions investigated the demographics and format of individual programmes, as well as specific exercise training characteristics. RESULTS: 297 eligible programmes were identified, with an 82% response rate. Most sites (82%) were based at hospital or outpatient centres, with home (15%), community (18%) or gym-based options (5%) less common. While CR was most often offered in a comprehensive format (72% of sites), the level of exercise intervention varied greatly among programmes. Most frequently, exercise was prescribed 1–2 times per week for 60 min over 7 weeks. Almost one-quarter (24%) had a sole practitioner supervising exercise, although the majority used a nurse/physiotherapist combination. Low to moderate exercise intensities were used in 60% of programmes, however, higher intensity prescriptions were not uncommon. Few sites (<6%) made use of technology, such as mobile phones or the internet, to deliver or support exercise training. CONCLUSIONS: While advances have been made towards providing flexible and accessible exercise-based CR, much of Australia's service remains within traditional models of care. A continuing focus on service improvement and evidence-based care should, therefore, be considered a core aim of those providing exercise for CR in order to improve health service delivery and optimise outcomes for patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4847132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48471322016-04-28 Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of Australian practice Abell, Bridget Glasziou, Paul Briffa, Tom Hoffmann, Tammy Open Heart Health Care Delivery, Economics and Global Health Care INTRODUCTION: Exercise training is a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), however, little information exists regarding the specific exercise interventions currently provided for coronary heart disease in Australian practice. We aimed to analyse the current status of exercise-based CR services across Australia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Australian sites offering exercise-based CR were identified from publically available directories. All sites were invited by email to participate in an online Survey Monkey questionnaire between October 2014 and March 2015, with reminders via email and phone follow-up. Questions investigated the demographics and format of individual programmes, as well as specific exercise training characteristics. RESULTS: 297 eligible programmes were identified, with an 82% response rate. Most sites (82%) were based at hospital or outpatient centres, with home (15%), community (18%) or gym-based options (5%) less common. While CR was most often offered in a comprehensive format (72% of sites), the level of exercise intervention varied greatly among programmes. Most frequently, exercise was prescribed 1–2 times per week for 60 min over 7 weeks. Almost one-quarter (24%) had a sole practitioner supervising exercise, although the majority used a nurse/physiotherapist combination. Low to moderate exercise intensities were used in 60% of programmes, however, higher intensity prescriptions were not uncommon. Few sites (<6%) made use of technology, such as mobile phones or the internet, to deliver or support exercise training. CONCLUSIONS: While advances have been made towards providing flexible and accessible exercise-based CR, much of Australia's service remains within traditional models of care. A continuing focus on service improvement and evidence-based care should, therefore, be considered a core aim of those providing exercise for CR in order to improve health service delivery and optimise outcomes for patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4847132/ /pubmed/27127639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2015-000374 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Care Delivery, Economics and Global Health Care Abell, Bridget Glasziou, Paul Briffa, Tom Hoffmann, Tammy Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of Australian practice |
title | Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of Australian practice |
title_full | Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of Australian practice |
title_fullStr | Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of Australian practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of Australian practice |
title_short | Exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of Australian practice |
title_sort | exercise training characteristics in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a cross-sectional survey of australian practice |
topic | Health Care Delivery, Economics and Global Health Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2015-000374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abellbridget exercisetrainingcharacteristicsincardiacrehabilitationprogrammesacrosssectionalsurveyofaustralianpractice AT glaszioupaul exercisetrainingcharacteristicsincardiacrehabilitationprogrammesacrosssectionalsurveyofaustralianpractice AT briffatom exercisetrainingcharacteristicsincardiacrehabilitationprogrammesacrosssectionalsurveyofaustralianpractice AT hoffmanntammy exercisetrainingcharacteristicsincardiacrehabilitationprogrammesacrosssectionalsurveyofaustralianpractice |