Cargando…
Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T
BACKGROUND: There is a need for improved worldwide access to tissue iron quantification using T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). One route to facilitate this would be simple in-line T2* analysis widely available on MR scanners. We therefore compared our clinically validated and established...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27121114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0243-4 |
_version_ | 1782429166303444992 |
---|---|
author | Alam, Mohammed H. He, Taigang Auger, Dominique Smith, Gillian C. Drivas, Peter Wage, Rick Izgi, Cemil Symmonds, Karen Greiser, Andreas Spottiswoode, Bruce S. Anderson, Lisa Firmin, David Pennell, Dudley J. |
author_facet | Alam, Mohammed H. He, Taigang Auger, Dominique Smith, Gillian C. Drivas, Peter Wage, Rick Izgi, Cemil Symmonds, Karen Greiser, Andreas Spottiswoode, Bruce S. Anderson, Lisa Firmin, David Pennell, Dudley J. |
author_sort | Alam, Mohammed H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a need for improved worldwide access to tissue iron quantification using T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). One route to facilitate this would be simple in-line T2* analysis widely available on MR scanners. We therefore compared our clinically validated and established T2* method at Royal Brompton Hospital (RBH T2*) against a novel work-in-progress (WIP) sequence with in-line T2* measurement from Siemens (WIP T2*). METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n = 22) and patients with iron overload (n = 78) were recruited (53 males, median age 34 years). A 1.5 T study (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens) was performed on all subjects. The same mid-ventricular short axis cardiac slice and transaxial slice through the liver were used to acquire both RBH T2* images and WIP T2* maps for each participant. Cardiac white blood (WB) and black blood (BB) sequences were acquired. Intraobserver, interobserver and interstudy reproducibility were measured on the same data from a subset of 20 participants. RESULTS: Liver T2* values ranged from 0.8 to 35.7 ms (median 5.1 ms) and cardiac T2* values from 6.0 to 52.3 ms (median 31 ms). The coefficient of variance (CoV) values for direct comparison of T2* values by RBH and WIP were 6.1–7.8 % across techniques. Accurate delineation of the septum was difficult on some WIP T2* maps due to artefacts. The inability to manually correct for noise by truncation of erroneous later echo times led to some overestimation of T2* using WIP T2* compared with the RBH T2*. Reproducibility CoV results for RBH T2* ranged from 1.5 to 5.7 % which were better than the reproducibility of WIP T2* values of 4.1–16.6 %. CONCLUSIONS: Iron estimation using the T2* CMR sequence in combination with Siemens’ in-line data processing is generally satisfactory and may help facilitate global access to tissue iron assessment. The current automated T2* map technique is less good for tissue iron assessment with noisy data at low T2* values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4847205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48472052016-04-28 Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T Alam, Mohammed H. He, Taigang Auger, Dominique Smith, Gillian C. Drivas, Peter Wage, Rick Izgi, Cemil Symmonds, Karen Greiser, Andreas Spottiswoode, Bruce S. Anderson, Lisa Firmin, David Pennell, Dudley J. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: There is a need for improved worldwide access to tissue iron quantification using T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). One route to facilitate this would be simple in-line T2* analysis widely available on MR scanners. We therefore compared our clinically validated and established T2* method at Royal Brompton Hospital (RBH T2*) against a novel work-in-progress (WIP) sequence with in-line T2* measurement from Siemens (WIP T2*). METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n = 22) and patients with iron overload (n = 78) were recruited (53 males, median age 34 years). A 1.5 T study (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens) was performed on all subjects. The same mid-ventricular short axis cardiac slice and transaxial slice through the liver were used to acquire both RBH T2* images and WIP T2* maps for each participant. Cardiac white blood (WB) and black blood (BB) sequences were acquired. Intraobserver, interobserver and interstudy reproducibility were measured on the same data from a subset of 20 participants. RESULTS: Liver T2* values ranged from 0.8 to 35.7 ms (median 5.1 ms) and cardiac T2* values from 6.0 to 52.3 ms (median 31 ms). The coefficient of variance (CoV) values for direct comparison of T2* values by RBH and WIP were 6.1–7.8 % across techniques. Accurate delineation of the septum was difficult on some WIP T2* maps due to artefacts. The inability to manually correct for noise by truncation of erroneous later echo times led to some overestimation of T2* using WIP T2* compared with the RBH T2*. Reproducibility CoV results for RBH T2* ranged from 1.5 to 5.7 % which were better than the reproducibility of WIP T2* values of 4.1–16.6 %. CONCLUSIONS: Iron estimation using the T2* CMR sequence in combination with Siemens’ in-line data processing is generally satisfactory and may help facilitate global access to tissue iron assessment. The current automated T2* map technique is less good for tissue iron assessment with noisy data at low T2* values. BioMed Central 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4847205/ /pubmed/27121114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0243-4 Text en © Alam et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Alam, Mohammed H. He, Taigang Auger, Dominique Smith, Gillian C. Drivas, Peter Wage, Rick Izgi, Cemil Symmonds, Karen Greiser, Andreas Spottiswoode, Bruce S. Anderson, Lisa Firmin, David Pennell, Dudley J. Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T |
title | Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T |
title_full | Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T |
title_fullStr | Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T |
title_short | Validation of T2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 T |
title_sort | validation of t2* in-line analysis for tissue iron quantification at 1.5 t |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27121114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0243-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alammohammedh validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT hetaigang validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT augerdominique validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT smithgillianc validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT drivaspeter validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT wagerick validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT izgicemil validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT symmondskaren validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT greiserandreas validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT spottiswoodebruces validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT andersonlisa validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT firmindavid validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t AT pennelldudleyj validationoft2inlineanalysisfortissueironquantificationat15t |