Cargando…

DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic connective tissue disease which is characterized by symetrical multiple joints involvement and extra-articular symptoms. Current EULAR diagnostic criteria for RA include disease activity parameters, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barczyńska, Tacjana Anna, Dura, Marta, Blumfield, Einat, Węgierska, Małgorzata, Żuchowski, Pawel, Wilińska-Jankowska, Arnika, Jeka, Sławomir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27407250
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/reum.2015.53999
_version_ 1782429184979632128
author Barczyńska, Tacjana Anna
Dura, Marta
Blumfield, Einat
Węgierska, Małgorzata
Żuchowski, Pawel
Wilińska-Jankowska, Arnika
Jeka, Sławomir
author_facet Barczyńska, Tacjana Anna
Dura, Marta
Blumfield, Einat
Węgierska, Małgorzata
Żuchowski, Pawel
Wilińska-Jankowska, Arnika
Jeka, Sławomir
author_sort Barczyńska, Tacjana Anna
collection PubMed
description Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic connective tissue disease which is characterized by symetrical multiple joints involvement and extra-articular symptoms. Current EULAR diagnostic criteria for RA include disease activity parameters, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), which are used to calculate disease activity scores, including DAS and DAS28. Recently attempts have been made to assess disease activity using imaging diagnostic modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US). Due to significant progress in therapy effectiveness and early RA diagnosis possibility, imaging modalities become increasingly meaningful and many clinical trials confirm their usefulness. However, there are no consistent criteria for objective assessment of therapy effectiveness based on US. Moreover, it is not US availability that limits its common use, but rather significant variability between operators. This is why US remains only an additional tool to assess therapy efficacy with regard to DAS/DAS28 index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4847288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48472882016-07-12 DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons Barczyńska, Tacjana Anna Dura, Marta Blumfield, Einat Węgierska, Małgorzata Żuchowski, Pawel Wilińska-Jankowska, Arnika Jeka, Sławomir Reumatologia Review Paper Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic connective tissue disease which is characterized by symetrical multiple joints involvement and extra-articular symptoms. Current EULAR diagnostic criteria for RA include disease activity parameters, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), which are used to calculate disease activity scores, including DAS and DAS28. Recently attempts have been made to assess disease activity using imaging diagnostic modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US). Due to significant progress in therapy effectiveness and early RA diagnosis possibility, imaging modalities become increasingly meaningful and many clinical trials confirm their usefulness. However, there are no consistent criteria for objective assessment of therapy effectiveness based on US. Moreover, it is not US availability that limits its common use, but rather significant variability between operators. This is why US remains only an additional tool to assess therapy efficacy with regard to DAS/DAS28 index. Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie 2015-09-21 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4847288/ /pubmed/27407250 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/reum.2015.53999 Text en Copyright © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Barczyńska, Tacjana Anna
Dura, Marta
Blumfield, Einat
Węgierska, Małgorzata
Żuchowski, Pawel
Wilińska-Jankowska, Arnika
Jeka, Sławomir
DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons
title DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons
title_full DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons
title_fullStr DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons
title_full_unstemmed DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons
title_short DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons
title_sort das28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27407250
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/reum.2015.53999
work_keys_str_mv AT barczynskatacjanaanna das28scorevsultrasoundexaminationforassessmentofrheumatoidarthritisdiseaseactivitycomparisonanddiscussionofprosandcons
AT duramarta das28scorevsultrasoundexaminationforassessmentofrheumatoidarthritisdiseaseactivitycomparisonanddiscussionofprosandcons
AT blumfieldeinat das28scorevsultrasoundexaminationforassessmentofrheumatoidarthritisdiseaseactivitycomparisonanddiscussionofprosandcons
AT wegierskamałgorzata das28scorevsultrasoundexaminationforassessmentofrheumatoidarthritisdiseaseactivitycomparisonanddiscussionofprosandcons
AT zuchowskipawel das28scorevsultrasoundexaminationforassessmentofrheumatoidarthritisdiseaseactivitycomparisonanddiscussionofprosandcons
AT wilinskajankowskaarnika das28scorevsultrasoundexaminationforassessmentofrheumatoidarthritisdiseaseactivitycomparisonanddiscussionofprosandcons
AT jekasławomir das28scorevsultrasoundexaminationforassessmentofrheumatoidarthritisdiseaseactivitycomparisonanddiscussionofprosandcons