Cargando…

Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s

The so-called chemical revolution has produced a vast historiographical corpus. Yet the patient’s voice remains surprisingly absent from these stories. Based on the archives of the Institut de Psychiatrie (Brussels), this paper traces the introduction of Largactil as recounted in patient letters, ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Majerus, Benoît
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26651188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2015.68
_version_ 1782429205615607808
author Majerus, Benoît
author_facet Majerus, Benoît
author_sort Majerus, Benoît
collection PubMed
description The so-called chemical revolution has produced a vast historiographical corpus. Yet the patient’s voice remains surprisingly absent from these stories. Based on the archives of the Institut de Psychiatrie (Brussels), this paper traces the introduction of Largactil as recounted in patient letters, physician records and nurse notes. The paper thus contributes to the history of therapies from below, but also participates in the historiographical debate about whether the introduction of neuroleptics can indeed be considered a revolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4847378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48473782016-04-27 Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s Majerus, Benoît Med Hist Articles The so-called chemical revolution has produced a vast historiographical corpus. Yet the patient’s voice remains surprisingly absent from these stories. Based on the archives of the Institut de Psychiatrie (Brussels), this paper traces the introduction of Largactil as recounted in patient letters, physician records and nurse notes. The paper thus contributes to the history of therapies from below, but also participates in the historiographical debate about whether the introduction of neuroleptics can indeed be considered a revolution. Cambridge University Press 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4847378/ /pubmed/26651188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2015.68 Text en © The Author 2015
spellingShingle Articles
Majerus, Benoît
Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s
title Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s
title_full Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s
title_fullStr Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s
title_full_unstemmed Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s
title_short Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s
title_sort making sense of the ‘chemical revolution’. patients’ voices on the introduction of neuroleptics in the 1950s
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26651188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2015.68
work_keys_str_mv AT majerusbenoit makingsenseofthechemicalrevolutionpatientsvoicesontheintroductionofneurolepticsinthe1950s