Cargando…
Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s
The so-called chemical revolution has produced a vast historiographical corpus. Yet the patient’s voice remains surprisingly absent from these stories. Based on the archives of the Institut de Psychiatrie (Brussels), this paper traces the introduction of Largactil as recounted in patient letters, ph...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26651188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2015.68 |
_version_ | 1782429205615607808 |
---|---|
author | Majerus, Benoît |
author_facet | Majerus, Benoît |
author_sort | Majerus, Benoît |
collection | PubMed |
description | The so-called chemical revolution has produced a vast historiographical corpus. Yet the patient’s voice remains surprisingly absent from these stories. Based on the archives of the Institut de Psychiatrie (Brussels), this paper traces the introduction of Largactil as recounted in patient letters, physician records and nurse notes. The paper thus contributes to the history of therapies from below, but also participates in the historiographical debate about whether the introduction of neuroleptics can indeed be considered a revolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4847378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48473782016-04-27 Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s Majerus, Benoît Med Hist Articles The so-called chemical revolution has produced a vast historiographical corpus. Yet the patient’s voice remains surprisingly absent from these stories. Based on the archives of the Institut de Psychiatrie (Brussels), this paper traces the introduction of Largactil as recounted in patient letters, physician records and nurse notes. The paper thus contributes to the history of therapies from below, but also participates in the historiographical debate about whether the introduction of neuroleptics can indeed be considered a revolution. Cambridge University Press 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4847378/ /pubmed/26651188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2015.68 Text en © The Author 2015 |
spellingShingle | Articles Majerus, Benoît Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s |
title | Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s |
title_full | Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s |
title_fullStr | Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s |
title_full_unstemmed | Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s |
title_short | Making Sense of the ‘Chemical Revolution’. Patients’ Voices on the Introduction of Neuroleptics in the 1950s |
title_sort | making sense of the ‘chemical revolution’. patients’ voices on the introduction of neuroleptics in the 1950s |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26651188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2015.68 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majerusbenoit makingsenseofthechemicalrevolutionpatientsvoicesontheintroductionofneurolepticsinthe1950s |