Cargando…

Clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators

BACKGROUND: Clinical attachment level is the most frequently used and acceptable parameter in monitoring periodontal status in diseased individual and denotes patterns of periodontal destruction. Awareness of root morphology and the condition of the periodontal tissues is essential for reliable peri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolte, Rajashri, Kolte, Abhay, Wattamwar, Pooja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143828
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.175174
_version_ 1782429220397383680
author Kolte, Rajashri
Kolte, Abhay
Wattamwar, Pooja
author_facet Kolte, Rajashri
Kolte, Abhay
Wattamwar, Pooja
author_sort Kolte, Rajashri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical attachment level is the most frequently used and acceptable parameter in monitoring periodontal status in diseased individual and denotes patterns of periodontal destruction. Awareness of root morphology and the condition of the periodontal tissues is essential for reliable periodontal pocket probing and for effective debridement of root surfaces. Clinically, it is challenging to observe exact nature of complex periodontal attachment loss. The aim of the present study was to evaluate patterns of periodontal destruction based on vertical and horizontal attachment loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 extracted teeth were obtained from chronic periodontitis patients. Prior to extraction, clinical measurements were recorded and after extraction, the teeth were stained with crystal violet. Root length, vertical and horizontal attachment loss were measured using digital caliper. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between clinical attachment level and vertical attachment loss for both maxillary and mandibular teeth. Mean vertical attachment loss varied between 5.17 mm and 9.17 mm. Interproximal surfaces exhibited statistically significant vertical attachment loss in both maxillary and mandibular dentition. Results indicated that vertical attachment loss was more severe with teeth belonging to the anterior sextant whereas the horizontal attachment loss was more pronounced with posterior teeth. CONCLUSION: Both vertical and horizontal attachment loss were observed in all periodontally involved teeth. There was a difference in clinical measurements and actual periodontal status denoted by postextraction staining. These findings have an impact on determining the prognosis and appropriate treatment plan for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4847462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48474622016-05-03 Clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators Kolte, Rajashri Kolte, Abhay Wattamwar, Pooja J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Clinical attachment level is the most frequently used and acceptable parameter in monitoring periodontal status in diseased individual and denotes patterns of periodontal destruction. Awareness of root morphology and the condition of the periodontal tissues is essential for reliable periodontal pocket probing and for effective debridement of root surfaces. Clinically, it is challenging to observe exact nature of complex periodontal attachment loss. The aim of the present study was to evaluate patterns of periodontal destruction based on vertical and horizontal attachment loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 extracted teeth were obtained from chronic periodontitis patients. Prior to extraction, clinical measurements were recorded and after extraction, the teeth were stained with crystal violet. Root length, vertical and horizontal attachment loss were measured using digital caliper. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between clinical attachment level and vertical attachment loss for both maxillary and mandibular teeth. Mean vertical attachment loss varied between 5.17 mm and 9.17 mm. Interproximal surfaces exhibited statistically significant vertical attachment loss in both maxillary and mandibular dentition. Results indicated that vertical attachment loss was more severe with teeth belonging to the anterior sextant whereas the horizontal attachment loss was more pronounced with posterior teeth. CONCLUSION: Both vertical and horizontal attachment loss were observed in all periodontally involved teeth. There was a difference in clinical measurements and actual periodontal status denoted by postextraction staining. These findings have an impact on determining the prognosis and appropriate treatment plan for patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4847462/ /pubmed/27143828 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.175174 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kolte, Rajashri
Kolte, Abhay
Wattamwar, Pooja
Clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators
title Clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators
title_full Clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators
title_fullStr Clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators
title_short Clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators
title_sort clinical and postextraction evaluation of periodontal disease indicators
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143828
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.175174
work_keys_str_mv AT kolterajashri clinicalandpostextractionevaluationofperiodontaldiseaseindicators
AT kolteabhay clinicalandpostextractionevaluationofperiodontaldiseaseindicators
AT wattamwarpooja clinicalandpostextractionevaluationofperiodontaldiseaseindicators