Cargando…

Retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Liposome bupivacaine, a prolonged-release bupivacaine formulation, recently became available at the Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD); before availability, postsurgical pain for large thoracic/abdominal procedures was primarily managed with opioids with/without continuous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Nicole M, Quiko, Albin S, Slotto, James G, Connolly, Nicholas C, Hackworth, Robert J, Heil, Justin W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186075
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S102305
_version_ 1782429245770825728
author King, Nicole M
Quiko, Albin S
Slotto, James G
Connolly, Nicholas C
Hackworth, Robert J
Heil, Justin W
author_facet King, Nicole M
Quiko, Albin S
Slotto, James G
Connolly, Nicholas C
Hackworth, Robert J
Heil, Justin W
author_sort King, Nicole M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Liposome bupivacaine, a prolonged-release bupivacaine formulation, recently became available at the Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD); before availability, postsurgical pain for large thoracic/abdominal procedures was primarily managed with opioids with/without continuous thoracic epidural (CTE) anesthesia. This retrospective chart review was part of a clinical quality initiative to determine whether postsurgical outcomes improved after liposome bupivacaine became available. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent laparotomy, sternotomy, or thoracotomy at NMCSD from May 2013 to May 2014 (after liposome bupivacaine treatment became available) were compared with data from patients who underwent these same procedures from December 2011 to May 2012 (before liposome bupivacaine treatment became available). Collected data included demographics, postoperative pain control methods, opioid consumption, perioperative pain scores, and lengths of intensive care unit and overall hospital stays. RESULTS: Data from 182 patients were collected: 88 pre-liposome bupivacaine (laparotomy, n=52; sternotomy, n=26; and thoracotomy, n=10) and 94 post-liposome bupivacaine (laparotomy, n=49; sternotomy, n=31; and thoracotomy, n=14) records. Mean hospital stay was 7.0 vs 5.8 days (P=0.009) in the pre- and post-liposome bupivacaine groups, respectively, and mean highest reported postoperative pain score was 7.1 vs 6.2 (P=0.007), respectively. No other significant between-group differences were observed for the overall population. In the laparotomy subgroup, there was a reduction in the proportion of patients who received CTE anesthesia post-liposome bupivacaine (22% [11/49] vs 35% [18/52] pre-liposome bupivacaine). CONCLUSION: Surgeons and anesthesiologists have changed the way they manage postoperative pain since the time point that liposome bupivacaine was introduced at NMCSD. Our findings suggest that utilization of liposome bupivacaine may be a useful alternative to epidural anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4847599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48475992016-05-16 Retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control King, Nicole M Quiko, Albin S Slotto, James G Connolly, Nicholas C Hackworth, Robert J Heil, Justin W J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Liposome bupivacaine, a prolonged-release bupivacaine formulation, recently became available at the Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD); before availability, postsurgical pain for large thoracic/abdominal procedures was primarily managed with opioids with/without continuous thoracic epidural (CTE) anesthesia. This retrospective chart review was part of a clinical quality initiative to determine whether postsurgical outcomes improved after liposome bupivacaine became available. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent laparotomy, sternotomy, or thoracotomy at NMCSD from May 2013 to May 2014 (after liposome bupivacaine treatment became available) were compared with data from patients who underwent these same procedures from December 2011 to May 2012 (before liposome bupivacaine treatment became available). Collected data included demographics, postoperative pain control methods, opioid consumption, perioperative pain scores, and lengths of intensive care unit and overall hospital stays. RESULTS: Data from 182 patients were collected: 88 pre-liposome bupivacaine (laparotomy, n=52; sternotomy, n=26; and thoracotomy, n=10) and 94 post-liposome bupivacaine (laparotomy, n=49; sternotomy, n=31; and thoracotomy, n=14) records. Mean hospital stay was 7.0 vs 5.8 days (P=0.009) in the pre- and post-liposome bupivacaine groups, respectively, and mean highest reported postoperative pain score was 7.1 vs 6.2 (P=0.007), respectively. No other significant between-group differences were observed for the overall population. In the laparotomy subgroup, there was a reduction in the proportion of patients who received CTE anesthesia post-liposome bupivacaine (22% [11/49] vs 35% [18/52] pre-liposome bupivacaine). CONCLUSION: Surgeons and anesthesiologists have changed the way they manage postoperative pain since the time point that liposome bupivacaine was introduced at NMCSD. Our findings suggest that utilization of liposome bupivacaine may be a useful alternative to epidural anesthesia. Dove Medical Press 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4847599/ /pubmed/27186075 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S102305 Text en © 2016 King et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
King, Nicole M
Quiko, Albin S
Slotto, James G
Connolly, Nicholas C
Hackworth, Robert J
Heil, Justin W
Retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control
title Retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control
title_full Retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control
title_fullStr Retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control
title_short Retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control
title_sort retrospective analysis of quality improvement when using liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186075
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S102305
work_keys_str_mv AT kingnicolem retrospectiveanalysisofqualityimprovementwhenusingliposomebupivacaineforpostoperativepaincontrol
AT quikoalbins retrospectiveanalysisofqualityimprovementwhenusingliposomebupivacaineforpostoperativepaincontrol
AT slottojamesg retrospectiveanalysisofqualityimprovementwhenusingliposomebupivacaineforpostoperativepaincontrol
AT connollynicholasc retrospectiveanalysisofqualityimprovementwhenusingliposomebupivacaineforpostoperativepaincontrol
AT hackworthrobertj retrospectiveanalysisofqualityimprovementwhenusingliposomebupivacaineforpostoperativepaincontrol
AT heiljustinw retrospectiveanalysisofqualityimprovementwhenusingliposomebupivacaineforpostoperativepaincontrol