Cargando…

The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship

Bacteria regulate many phenotypes via quorum sensing systems. Quorum sensing is typically thought to evolve because the regulated cooperative phenotypes are only beneficial at certain cell densities. However, quorum sensing systems are also threatened by non-cooperative “cheaters” that may exploit q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schluter, Jonas, Schoech, Armin P., Foster, Kevin R., Mitri, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27120081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004848
_version_ 1782429260268437504
author Schluter, Jonas
Schoech, Armin P.
Foster, Kevin R.
Mitri, Sara
author_facet Schluter, Jonas
Schoech, Armin P.
Foster, Kevin R.
Mitri, Sara
author_sort Schluter, Jonas
collection PubMed
description Bacteria regulate many phenotypes via quorum sensing systems. Quorum sensing is typically thought to evolve because the regulated cooperative phenotypes are only beneficial at certain cell densities. However, quorum sensing systems are also threatened by non-cooperative “cheaters” that may exploit quorum-sensing regulated cooperation, which begs the question of how quorum sensing systems are maintained in nature. Here we study the evolution of quorum sensing using an individual-based model that captures the natural ecology and population structuring of microbial communities. We first recapitulate the two existing observations on quorum sensing evolution: density-dependent benefits favor quorum sensing but competition and cheating will destabilize it. We then model quorum sensing in a dense community like a biofilm, which reveals a novel benefit to quorum sensing that is intrinsically evolutionarily stable. In these communities, competing microbial genotypes gradually segregate over time leading to positive correlation between density and genetic similarity between neighboring cells (relatedness). This enables quorum sensing to track genetic relatedness and ensures that costly cooperative traits are only activated once a cell is safely surrounded by clonemates. We hypothesize that under similar natural conditions, the benefits of quorum sensing will not result from an assessment of density but from the ability to infer kinship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4847791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48477912016-05-07 The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship Schluter, Jonas Schoech, Armin P. Foster, Kevin R. Mitri, Sara PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Bacteria regulate many phenotypes via quorum sensing systems. Quorum sensing is typically thought to evolve because the regulated cooperative phenotypes are only beneficial at certain cell densities. However, quorum sensing systems are also threatened by non-cooperative “cheaters” that may exploit quorum-sensing regulated cooperation, which begs the question of how quorum sensing systems are maintained in nature. Here we study the evolution of quorum sensing using an individual-based model that captures the natural ecology and population structuring of microbial communities. We first recapitulate the two existing observations on quorum sensing evolution: density-dependent benefits favor quorum sensing but competition and cheating will destabilize it. We then model quorum sensing in a dense community like a biofilm, which reveals a novel benefit to quorum sensing that is intrinsically evolutionarily stable. In these communities, competing microbial genotypes gradually segregate over time leading to positive correlation between density and genetic similarity between neighboring cells (relatedness). This enables quorum sensing to track genetic relatedness and ensures that costly cooperative traits are only activated once a cell is safely surrounded by clonemates. We hypothesize that under similar natural conditions, the benefits of quorum sensing will not result from an assessment of density but from the ability to infer kinship. Public Library of Science 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4847791/ /pubmed/27120081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004848 Text en © 2016 Schluter et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schluter, Jonas
Schoech, Armin P.
Foster, Kevin R.
Mitri, Sara
The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship
title The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship
title_full The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship
title_fullStr The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship
title_short The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship
title_sort evolution of quorum sensing as a mechanism to infer kinship
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27120081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004848
work_keys_str_mv AT schluterjonas theevolutionofquorumsensingasamechanismtoinferkinship
AT schoecharminp theevolutionofquorumsensingasamechanismtoinferkinship
AT fosterkevinr theevolutionofquorumsensingasamechanismtoinferkinship
AT mitrisara theevolutionofquorumsensingasamechanismtoinferkinship
AT schluterjonas evolutionofquorumsensingasamechanismtoinferkinship
AT schoecharminp evolutionofquorumsensingasamechanismtoinferkinship
AT fosterkevinr evolutionofquorumsensingasamechanismtoinferkinship
AT mitrisara evolutionofquorumsensingasamechanismtoinferkinship