Cargando…

The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population

Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) is a diagnostic criterion for sarcopenia. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) offers a bedside approach to measure ASM but the performance of BIA prediction equations (PE) varies with ethnicities and body composition. We aim to validate the performance of f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Solomon C. Y., Powell, Alice, Khow, Kareeann S. F., Visvanathan, Renuka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043617
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8040189
_version_ 1782429390456487936
author Yu, Solomon C. Y.
Powell, Alice
Khow, Kareeann S. F.
Visvanathan, Renuka
author_facet Yu, Solomon C. Y.
Powell, Alice
Khow, Kareeann S. F.
Visvanathan, Renuka
author_sort Yu, Solomon C. Y.
collection PubMed
description Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) is a diagnostic criterion for sarcopenia. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) offers a bedside approach to measure ASM but the performance of BIA prediction equations (PE) varies with ethnicities and body composition. We aim to validate the performance of five PEs in estimating ASM against estimation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We recruited 195 healthy adult Australians and ASM was measured using single-frequency BIA. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the predictive accuracy of ASM as determined by BIA against DXA. Precision (root mean square error (RMSE)) and bias (mean error (ME)) were calculated according to the method of Sheiner and Beal. Four PEs (except that by Kim) showed ASM values that correlated strongly with ASM(DXA) (r ranging from 0.96 to 0.97, p < 0.001). The Sergi equation performed the best with the lowest ME of −1.09 kg (CI: −0.84–−1.34, p < 0.001) and the RMSE was 2.09 kg (CI: 1.72–2.47). In men, the Kyle equation performed better with the lowest ME (−0.32 kg (CI: −0.66–0.02) and RMSE (1.54 kg (CI: 1.14–1.93)). The Sergi equation is applicable in adult Australians (Caucasian) whereas the Kyle equation can be considered in males. The need remains to validate PEs in other ethnicities and to develop equations suitable for multi-frequency BIA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4848658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48486582016-05-04 The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population Yu, Solomon C. Y. Powell, Alice Khow, Kareeann S. F. Visvanathan, Renuka Nutrients Article Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) is a diagnostic criterion for sarcopenia. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) offers a bedside approach to measure ASM but the performance of BIA prediction equations (PE) varies with ethnicities and body composition. We aim to validate the performance of five PEs in estimating ASM against estimation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We recruited 195 healthy adult Australians and ASM was measured using single-frequency BIA. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the predictive accuracy of ASM as determined by BIA against DXA. Precision (root mean square error (RMSE)) and bias (mean error (ME)) were calculated according to the method of Sheiner and Beal. Four PEs (except that by Kim) showed ASM values that correlated strongly with ASM(DXA) (r ranging from 0.96 to 0.97, p < 0.001). The Sergi equation performed the best with the lowest ME of −1.09 kg (CI: −0.84–−1.34, p < 0.001) and the RMSE was 2.09 kg (CI: 1.72–2.47). In men, the Kyle equation performed better with the lowest ME (−0.32 kg (CI: −0.66–0.02) and RMSE (1.54 kg (CI: 1.14–1.93)). The Sergi equation is applicable in adult Australians (Caucasian) whereas the Kyle equation can be considered in males. The need remains to validate PEs in other ethnicities and to develop equations suitable for multi-frequency BIA. MDPI 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4848658/ /pubmed/27043617 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8040189 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yu, Solomon C. Y.
Powell, Alice
Khow, Kareeann S. F.
Visvanathan, Renuka
The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population
title The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population
title_full The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population
title_fullStr The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population
title_full_unstemmed The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population
title_short The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population
title_sort performance of five bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equations against dual x-ray absorptiometry in estimating appendicular skeletal muscle mass in an adult australian population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27043617
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu8040189
work_keys_str_mv AT yusolomoncy theperformanceoffivebioelectricalimpedanceanalysispredictionequationsagainstdualxrayabsorptiometryinestimatingappendicularskeletalmusclemassinanadultaustralianpopulation
AT powellalice theperformanceoffivebioelectricalimpedanceanalysispredictionequationsagainstdualxrayabsorptiometryinestimatingappendicularskeletalmusclemassinanadultaustralianpopulation
AT khowkareeannsf theperformanceoffivebioelectricalimpedanceanalysispredictionequationsagainstdualxrayabsorptiometryinestimatingappendicularskeletalmusclemassinanadultaustralianpopulation
AT visvanathanrenuka theperformanceoffivebioelectricalimpedanceanalysispredictionequationsagainstdualxrayabsorptiometryinestimatingappendicularskeletalmusclemassinanadultaustralianpopulation
AT yusolomoncy performanceoffivebioelectricalimpedanceanalysispredictionequationsagainstdualxrayabsorptiometryinestimatingappendicularskeletalmusclemassinanadultaustralianpopulation
AT powellalice performanceoffivebioelectricalimpedanceanalysispredictionequationsagainstdualxrayabsorptiometryinestimatingappendicularskeletalmusclemassinanadultaustralianpopulation
AT khowkareeannsf performanceoffivebioelectricalimpedanceanalysispredictionequationsagainstdualxrayabsorptiometryinestimatingappendicularskeletalmusclemassinanadultaustralianpopulation
AT visvanathanrenuka performanceoffivebioelectricalimpedanceanalysispredictionequationsagainstdualxrayabsorptiometryinestimatingappendicularskeletalmusclemassinanadultaustralianpopulation