Cargando…

Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Delayed first medical consultation (patient’s delay) is quite common in cases of penile carcinoma (PC), but its reasons and impacts remain unclear. We conducted this study to ascertain risk factors resulting in delayed treatment seeking and evaluate its influence on prognosis. METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Wen, Song, Le-bin, Yang, Jie, Song, Ning-hong, Wu, Xin-feng, Song, Ning-jing, Qiao, Di, Chen, Chen, Zhang, Jia-yi, Wang, Zeng-jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27121955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0863-z
_version_ 1782429415278379008
author Gao, Wen
Song, Le-bin
Yang, Jie
Song, Ning-hong
Wu, Xin-feng
Song, Ning-jing
Qiao, Di
Chen, Chen
Zhang, Jia-yi
Wang, Zeng-jun
author_facet Gao, Wen
Song, Le-bin
Yang, Jie
Song, Ning-hong
Wu, Xin-feng
Song, Ning-jing
Qiao, Di
Chen, Chen
Zhang, Jia-yi
Wang, Zeng-jun
author_sort Gao, Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delayed first medical consultation (patient’s delay) is quite common in cases of penile carcinoma (PC), but its reasons and impacts remain unclear. We conducted this study to ascertain risk factors resulting in delayed treatment seeking and evaluate its influence on prognosis. METHODS: From 2004 to 2010 at 4 centers, 254 patients were enrolled into this study from 262 consecutive PC cases. Patients’ sexual performance was investigated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 at the sixth-month end after treatment. Data for prognostic analyses was obtained via a 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: A multivariate model ascertained 4 risk factors (single, living in rural areas, heavy drinking alcohol, and aspecific initial symptoms) and 1 protective factor (history of condyloma) significantly associated with patient’s delay. Delay >3 months led to significant risks for adverse clinical characteristics, low penis-sparing rate, and poor sexual function restoration. Although patient’s delay was not found to impact on postoperative relapses and 5-year overall survival (OS), patients with delay >6 months had significantly inferior 2-year OS. CONCLUSIONS: Single, living in rural areas, heavy drinking alcohol, and aspecific initial symptoms are significant risk factors of PC associated with patient’s delay. Delay >3 months will lead to significantly inferior clinical consequences. Minimizing patient’s delay is the key to avoid amputation and retain superior sexual potency. Improving patient education on initial symptoms of PC is necessary in men of >40 years old. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12957-016-0863-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4848776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48487762016-04-29 Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma Gao, Wen Song, Le-bin Yang, Jie Song, Ning-hong Wu, Xin-feng Song, Ning-jing Qiao, Di Chen, Chen Zhang, Jia-yi Wang, Zeng-jun World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Delayed first medical consultation (patient’s delay) is quite common in cases of penile carcinoma (PC), but its reasons and impacts remain unclear. We conducted this study to ascertain risk factors resulting in delayed treatment seeking and evaluate its influence on prognosis. METHODS: From 2004 to 2010 at 4 centers, 254 patients were enrolled into this study from 262 consecutive PC cases. Patients’ sexual performance was investigated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 at the sixth-month end after treatment. Data for prognostic analyses was obtained via a 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: A multivariate model ascertained 4 risk factors (single, living in rural areas, heavy drinking alcohol, and aspecific initial symptoms) and 1 protective factor (history of condyloma) significantly associated with patient’s delay. Delay >3 months led to significant risks for adverse clinical characteristics, low penis-sparing rate, and poor sexual function restoration. Although patient’s delay was not found to impact on postoperative relapses and 5-year overall survival (OS), patients with delay >6 months had significantly inferior 2-year OS. CONCLUSIONS: Single, living in rural areas, heavy drinking alcohol, and aspecific initial symptoms are significant risk factors of PC associated with patient’s delay. Delay >3 months will lead to significantly inferior clinical consequences. Minimizing patient’s delay is the key to avoid amputation and retain superior sexual potency. Improving patient education on initial symptoms of PC is necessary in men of >40 years old. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12957-016-0863-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4848776/ /pubmed/27121955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0863-z Text en © Gao et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gao, Wen
Song, Le-bin
Yang, Jie
Song, Ning-hong
Wu, Xin-feng
Song, Ning-jing
Qiao, Di
Chen, Chen
Zhang, Jia-yi
Wang, Zeng-jun
Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma
title Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma
title_full Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma
title_fullStr Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma
title_short Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma
title_sort risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27121955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0863-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gaowen riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT songlebin riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT yangjie riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT songninghong riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT wuxinfeng riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT songningjing riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT qiaodi riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT chenchen riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT zhangjiayi riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma
AT wangzengjun riskfactorsandnegativeconsequencesofpatientsdelayforpenilecarcinoma