Cargando…

Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses

BACKGROUND: There appears to be divergence between nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of dyspnoea onset and on how help should be given. This may affect how nurses understand and assess their patients’ anxiety and the severity of dyspnoea, potentially diminishing their chances of relieving patients’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jellington, Maria Omel, Overgaard, Dorthe, Sørensen, Erik Elgaard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0148-4
_version_ 1782429430042329088
author Jellington, Maria Omel
Overgaard, Dorthe
Sørensen, Erik Elgaard
author_facet Jellington, Maria Omel
Overgaard, Dorthe
Sørensen, Erik Elgaard
author_sort Jellington, Maria Omel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There appears to be divergence between nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of dyspnoea onset and on how help should be given. This may affect how nurses understand and assess their patients’ anxiety and the severity of dyspnoea, potentially diminishing their chances of relieving patients’ dyspnoea. The aim of this study was to explore nurse–patient interaction in situations where patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are experiencing acute or worsened dyspnoea in a hospital setting. METHODS: An ethnographic study using participant observation of two nurses’ interactions with six patients, followed by qualitative in-depth interviews with the nurses. Data were analysed in three steps. First, they were coded for identification of preliminary themes. Second, data were regrouped into preliminary themes for focused analysis which led to formulation of themes and subthemes. Third, hermeneutical principles were used as all data were interpreted from the viewpoint of each theme. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: Manoeuvring along the edge; Dyspnoea within the pattern; and Dyspnoea outside the pattern. They were encompassed by the main finding: Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness. The nurses attempted to navigate between implicit and explicit care approaches and to create a sphere for relieving or avoiding further worsening of dyspnoea. Depending on the identified pattern for a particular dyspnoeic episode, nurses attributed different significance to the dyspnoea. CONCLUSIONS: Interacting in dyspnoeic situations places nurses in a dilemma: an implicit approach risk, deriving from exclusion of patients and performing hesitantly; or an explicit negotiation risk, where patients are exhausted and removed from focusing and breathing. The dilemma weakens nurses’ opportunities to relieve or avoid a worsening of the dyspnoea. Likewise, the divergence between nurses’ and patients’ assessment of dyspnoea as within or outside the pattern appears to jeopardize the efficiency of care. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the challenges of respiratory nursing care in general, and the challenges of relieving in-patients’ dyspnoea in particular.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4848841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48488412016-04-29 Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses Jellington, Maria Omel Overgaard, Dorthe Sørensen, Erik Elgaard BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: There appears to be divergence between nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of dyspnoea onset and on how help should be given. This may affect how nurses understand and assess their patients’ anxiety and the severity of dyspnoea, potentially diminishing their chances of relieving patients’ dyspnoea. The aim of this study was to explore nurse–patient interaction in situations where patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are experiencing acute or worsened dyspnoea in a hospital setting. METHODS: An ethnographic study using participant observation of two nurses’ interactions with six patients, followed by qualitative in-depth interviews with the nurses. Data were analysed in three steps. First, they were coded for identification of preliminary themes. Second, data were regrouped into preliminary themes for focused analysis which led to formulation of themes and subthemes. Third, hermeneutical principles were used as all data were interpreted from the viewpoint of each theme. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: Manoeuvring along the edge; Dyspnoea within the pattern; and Dyspnoea outside the pattern. They were encompassed by the main finding: Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness. The nurses attempted to navigate between implicit and explicit care approaches and to create a sphere for relieving or avoiding further worsening of dyspnoea. Depending on the identified pattern for a particular dyspnoeic episode, nurses attributed different significance to the dyspnoea. CONCLUSIONS: Interacting in dyspnoeic situations places nurses in a dilemma: an implicit approach risk, deriving from exclusion of patients and performing hesitantly; or an explicit negotiation risk, where patients are exhausted and removed from focusing and breathing. The dilemma weakens nurses’ opportunities to relieve or avoid a worsening of the dyspnoea. Likewise, the divergence between nurses’ and patients’ assessment of dyspnoea as within or outside the pattern appears to jeopardize the efficiency of care. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the challenges of respiratory nursing care in general, and the challenges of relieving in-patients’ dyspnoea in particular. BioMed Central 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4848841/ /pubmed/27127418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0148-4 Text en © Jellington et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jellington, Maria Omel
Overgaard, Dorthe
Sørensen, Erik Elgaard
Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses
title Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses
title_full Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses
title_fullStr Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses
title_full_unstemmed Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses
title_short Manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses
title_sort manoeuvring along the edge of breathlessness: an ethnographic case study of two nurses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4848841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0148-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jellingtonmariaomel manoeuvringalongtheedgeofbreathlessnessanethnographiccasestudyoftwonurses
AT overgaarddorthe manoeuvringalongtheedgeofbreathlessnessanethnographiccasestudyoftwonurses
AT sørensenerikelgaard manoeuvringalongtheedgeofbreathlessnessanethnographiccasestudyoftwonurses