Cargando…

Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design

Introduction: Total humeral replacement is used to reconstruct the upper limb after tumour resection, while in cases of complex revisions for non-oncological reasons, using tumour prosthesis implants will lead to an otherwise avoidable further bone resection and violation of the surrounding tissues....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammed, Ali Abdullah, Frostick, Simon Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27163092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015045
_version_ 1782429516636880896
author Mohammed, Ali Abdullah
Frostick, Simon Peter
author_facet Mohammed, Ali Abdullah
Frostick, Simon Peter
author_sort Mohammed, Ali Abdullah
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Total humeral replacement is used to reconstruct the upper limb after tumour resection, while in cases of complex revisions for non-oncological reasons, using tumour prosthesis implants will lead to an otherwise avoidable further bone resection and violation of the surrounding tissues. This report describes a design evolution in three non-oncological cases, where a total humeral resection to perform a total humeral replacement is avoided and instead the simultaneous shoulder and elbow replacements were connected via custom-made intramedullary linkages. Methods: Three cases of simultaneous shoulder and elbow replacement were performed for complex revision situations over a period of 42 months. They were performed while preserving as much humeral bone stock as possible, with the design changing from a big intramedullary connecting stem to a smaller component when performing an Intramedullary Humeral Replacement (IMHR), allowing preservation of more bone and soft tissue attachment than if a total humeral replacement were performed. Results: None had any neurovascular complication or any further revision for the humeral replacement, or the shoulder and elbow components. Discussion: We have showed three examples of an evolving design aiming to preserve as much of the anatomy as possible to help in decreasing the surgical impact and invasiveness of this procedure, while doing less bone resection and sacrificing less of the soft tissue attachments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4849264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48492642016-05-09 Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design Mohammed, Ali Abdullah Frostick, Simon Peter SICOT J Original Article Introduction: Total humeral replacement is used to reconstruct the upper limb after tumour resection, while in cases of complex revisions for non-oncological reasons, using tumour prosthesis implants will lead to an otherwise avoidable further bone resection and violation of the surrounding tissues. This report describes a design evolution in three non-oncological cases, where a total humeral resection to perform a total humeral replacement is avoided and instead the simultaneous shoulder and elbow replacements were connected via custom-made intramedullary linkages. Methods: Three cases of simultaneous shoulder and elbow replacement were performed for complex revision situations over a period of 42 months. They were performed while preserving as much humeral bone stock as possible, with the design changing from a big intramedullary connecting stem to a smaller component when performing an Intramedullary Humeral Replacement (IMHR), allowing preservation of more bone and soft tissue attachment than if a total humeral replacement were performed. Results: None had any neurovascular complication or any further revision for the humeral replacement, or the shoulder and elbow components. Discussion: We have showed three examples of an evolving design aiming to preserve as much of the anatomy as possible to help in decreasing the surgical impact and invasiveness of this procedure, while doing less bone resection and sacrificing less of the soft tissue attachments. EDP Sciences 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4849264/ /pubmed/27163092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015045 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammed, Ali Abdullah
Frostick, Simon Peter
Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design
title Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design
title_full Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design
title_fullStr Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design
title_full_unstemmed Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design
title_short Intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design
title_sort intramedullary humeral replacement: an evolving design
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27163092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015045
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedaliabdullah intramedullaryhumeralreplacementanevolvingdesign
AT frosticksimonpeter intramedullaryhumeralreplacementanevolvingdesign