Cargando…

Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review

Introduction: Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement (TKR) is an evolving concept. Successful treatment of instability requires an understanding of the different types of instability. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify information pertinent to midflexion instabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ramappa, Manjunath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27163080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015020
_version_ 1782429518460354560
author Ramappa, Manjunath
author_facet Ramappa, Manjunath
author_sort Ramappa, Manjunath
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement (TKR) is an evolving concept. Successful treatment of instability requires an understanding of the different types of instability. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify information pertinent to midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement, utilising PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included Embase, Medline, All of the Cochrane Library, PubMed and cross references. Results: Three factors, i.e., elevated joint line, multiradii femoral component and medial collateral ligament (MCL) laxity, were identified to influence midflexion instability. Literature suggested mediolateral instability at 30–60° of flexion as diagnostic of midflexion instability. Literature search also revealed paucity in clinical studies analysing midflexion instability. Most of the evidence was obtained from cadaveric studies for elevated joint line and MCL laxity. Clinical studies on multiradii femoral component were limited by their small study size and early followup period. Conclusion: Elevated joint line, multiradii femoral component and MCL laxity have been suggested to cause midflexion laxity in primary TKR. Due to limitations in available evidence, this review was unable to raise the strength of overall evidence. Future well-designed clinical studies are essential to make definitive conclusions. This review serves as a baseline for future researchers and creates awareness for routine assessment of midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4849283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48492832016-05-09 Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review Ramappa, Manjunath SICOT J Review Article Introduction: Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement (TKR) is an evolving concept. Successful treatment of instability requires an understanding of the different types of instability. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify information pertinent to midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement, utilising PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included Embase, Medline, All of the Cochrane Library, PubMed and cross references. Results: Three factors, i.e., elevated joint line, multiradii femoral component and medial collateral ligament (MCL) laxity, were identified to influence midflexion instability. Literature suggested mediolateral instability at 30–60° of flexion as diagnostic of midflexion instability. Literature search also revealed paucity in clinical studies analysing midflexion instability. Most of the evidence was obtained from cadaveric studies for elevated joint line and MCL laxity. Clinical studies on multiradii femoral component were limited by their small study size and early followup period. Conclusion: Elevated joint line, multiradii femoral component and MCL laxity have been suggested to cause midflexion laxity in primary TKR. Due to limitations in available evidence, this review was unable to raise the strength of overall evidence. Future well-designed clinical studies are essential to make definitive conclusions. This review serves as a baseline for future researchers and creates awareness for routine assessment of midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement. EDP Sciences 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4849283/ /pubmed/27163080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015020 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ramappa, Manjunath
Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review
title Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review
title_full Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review
title_fullStr Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review
title_full_unstemmed Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review
title_short Midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review
title_sort midflexion instability in primary total knee replacement: a review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27163080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015020
work_keys_str_mv AT ramappamanjunath midflexioninstabilityinprimarytotalkneereplacementareview