Cargando…

The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results

Purpose: Evaluate the efficacy of using the SIGN nail for instrumented knee fusion. Methods: Six consecutive patients (seven knees, three males) with an average age of 30.5 years (range, 18–50 years) underwent a knee arthrodesis with SIGN nail (mean follow-up 10.7 months; range, 8–14 months). Diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Duane Ray, Anderson, Lucas Aaron, Haller, Justin M., Feyissa, Abebe Chala
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27163095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015038
_version_ 1782429529154781184
author Anderson, Duane Ray
Anderson, Lucas Aaron
Haller, Justin M.
Feyissa, Abebe Chala
author_facet Anderson, Duane Ray
Anderson, Lucas Aaron
Haller, Justin M.
Feyissa, Abebe Chala
author_sort Anderson, Duane Ray
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Evaluate the efficacy of using the SIGN nail for instrumented knee fusion. Methods: Six consecutive patients (seven knees, three males) with an average age of 30.5 years (range, 18–50 years) underwent a knee arthrodesis with SIGN nail (mean follow-up 10.7 months; range, 8–14 months). Diagnoses included tuberculosis (two knees), congenital knee dislocation in two knees (one patient), bacterial septic arthritis (one knee), malunited spontaneous fusion (one knee), and severe gout with 90° flexion contracture (one knee). The nail was inserted through an anteromedial entry point on the femur and full weightbearing was permitted immediately. Results: All knees had clinical and radiographic evidence of fusion at final follow-up and none required further surgery. Four of six patients ambulated without assistive device, and all patients reported improved overall physical function. There were no post-operative complications. Conclusion: The technique described utilizing the SIGN nail is both safe and effective for knee arthrodesis and useful for austere environments with limited fluoroscopy and implant options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4849330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48493302016-05-09 The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results Anderson, Duane Ray Anderson, Lucas Aaron Haller, Justin M. Feyissa, Abebe Chala SICOT J Original Article Purpose: Evaluate the efficacy of using the SIGN nail for instrumented knee fusion. Methods: Six consecutive patients (seven knees, three males) with an average age of 30.5 years (range, 18–50 years) underwent a knee arthrodesis with SIGN nail (mean follow-up 10.7 months; range, 8–14 months). Diagnoses included tuberculosis (two knees), congenital knee dislocation in two knees (one patient), bacterial septic arthritis (one knee), malunited spontaneous fusion (one knee), and severe gout with 90° flexion contracture (one knee). The nail was inserted through an anteromedial entry point on the femur and full weightbearing was permitted immediately. Results: All knees had clinical and radiographic evidence of fusion at final follow-up and none required further surgery. Four of six patients ambulated without assistive device, and all patients reported improved overall physical function. There were no post-operative complications. Conclusion: The technique described utilizing the SIGN nail is both safe and effective for knee arthrodesis and useful for austere environments with limited fluoroscopy and implant options. EDP Sciences 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4849330/ /pubmed/27163095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015038 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Anderson, Duane Ray
Anderson, Lucas Aaron
Haller, Justin M.
Feyissa, Abebe Chala
The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results
title The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results
title_full The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results
title_fullStr The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results
title_full_unstemmed The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results
title_short The SIGN nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results
title_sort sign nail for knee fusion: technique and clinical results
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27163095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015038
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonduaneray thesignnailforkneefusiontechniqueandclinicalresults
AT andersonlucasaaron thesignnailforkneefusiontechniqueandclinicalresults
AT hallerjustinm thesignnailforkneefusiontechniqueandclinicalresults
AT feyissaabebechala thesignnailforkneefusiontechniqueandclinicalresults
AT andersonduaneray signnailforkneefusiontechniqueandclinicalresults
AT andersonlucasaaron signnailforkneefusiontechniqueandclinicalresults
AT hallerjustinm signnailforkneefusiontechniqueandclinicalresults
AT feyissaabebechala signnailforkneefusiontechniqueandclinicalresults