Cargando…

Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review

Given the global burden of psychotic disorders, the identification of patients with early-onset psychosis (EOP; that is, onset before the age of 18) at higher risk of adverse outcome should be a priority. A systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, and PsycInfo (1980 through August 2014) was performed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Díaz-Caneja, Covadonga M, Pina-Camacho, Laura, Rodríguez-Quiroga, Alberto, Fraguas, David, Parellada, Mara, Arango, Celso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27336027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjschz.2014.5
_version_ 1782429540117643264
author Díaz-Caneja, Covadonga M
Pina-Camacho, Laura
Rodríguez-Quiroga, Alberto
Fraguas, David
Parellada, Mara
Arango, Celso
author_facet Díaz-Caneja, Covadonga M
Pina-Camacho, Laura
Rodríguez-Quiroga, Alberto
Fraguas, David
Parellada, Mara
Arango, Celso
author_sort Díaz-Caneja, Covadonga M
collection PubMed
description Given the global burden of psychotic disorders, the identification of patients with early-onset psychosis (EOP; that is, onset before the age of 18) at higher risk of adverse outcome should be a priority. A systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, and PsycInfo (1980 through August 2014) was performed to identify longitudinal observational studies assessing correlates and/or predictors of clinical, functional, cognitive, and biological outcomes in EOP. Seventy-five studies were included in the review. Using multivariate models, the most replicated predictors of worse clinical, functional, cognitive, and biological outcomes in EOP were premorbid difficulties and symptom severity (especially of negative symptoms) at baseline. Longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) predicted worse clinical, functional, and cognitive outcomes. Higher risk of attempting suicide was predicted by greater severity of psychotic illness and of depressive symptoms at the first episode of psychosis. Age at onset and sex were not found to be relevant predictors of outcome in most multivariate models, whereas studies using bivariate analyses yielded inconsistent results. Lower intelligence quotient at baseline predicted lower insight at follow-up, worse functional outcomes, and a diagnostic outcome of schizophrenia. Biological predictors of outcome in EOP have been little studied and have not been replicated. Lower levels of antioxidants at baseline predicted greater brain volume changes and worse cognitive functioning at follow-up, whereas neuroimaging markers such as regional cortical thickness and gray matter volume at baseline predicted remission and better insight at follow-up, respectively. EOP patients with poorer premorbid adjustment and prominent negative symptoms at initial presentation are at risk of poor outcome. They should therefore be the target of careful monitoring and more intensive interventions to address whether the disease course can be modified in this especially severely affected group. Early intervention strategies to reduce DUP may also improve outcome in EOP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4849440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48494402016-06-22 Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review Díaz-Caneja, Covadonga M Pina-Camacho, Laura Rodríguez-Quiroga, Alberto Fraguas, David Parellada, Mara Arango, Celso NPJ Schizophr Review Article Given the global burden of psychotic disorders, the identification of patients with early-onset psychosis (EOP; that is, onset before the age of 18) at higher risk of adverse outcome should be a priority. A systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, and PsycInfo (1980 through August 2014) was performed to identify longitudinal observational studies assessing correlates and/or predictors of clinical, functional, cognitive, and biological outcomes in EOP. Seventy-five studies were included in the review. Using multivariate models, the most replicated predictors of worse clinical, functional, cognitive, and biological outcomes in EOP were premorbid difficulties and symptom severity (especially of negative symptoms) at baseline. Longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) predicted worse clinical, functional, and cognitive outcomes. Higher risk of attempting suicide was predicted by greater severity of psychotic illness and of depressive symptoms at the first episode of psychosis. Age at onset and sex were not found to be relevant predictors of outcome in most multivariate models, whereas studies using bivariate analyses yielded inconsistent results. Lower intelligence quotient at baseline predicted lower insight at follow-up, worse functional outcomes, and a diagnostic outcome of schizophrenia. Biological predictors of outcome in EOP have been little studied and have not been replicated. Lower levels of antioxidants at baseline predicted greater brain volume changes and worse cognitive functioning at follow-up, whereas neuroimaging markers such as regional cortical thickness and gray matter volume at baseline predicted remission and better insight at follow-up, respectively. EOP patients with poorer premorbid adjustment and prominent negative symptoms at initial presentation are at risk of poor outcome. They should therefore be the target of careful monitoring and more intensive interventions to address whether the disease course can be modified in this especially severely affected group. Early intervention strategies to reduce DUP may also improve outcome in EOP. Nature Publishing Group 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4849440/ /pubmed/27336027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjschz.2014.5 Text en Copyright © 2015 Schizophrenia International Research Group/Nature Publishing Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Review Article
Díaz-Caneja, Covadonga M
Pina-Camacho, Laura
Rodríguez-Quiroga, Alberto
Fraguas, David
Parellada, Mara
Arango, Celso
Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review
title Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review
title_full Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review
title_short Predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review
title_sort predictors of outcome in early-onset psychosis: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27336027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjschz.2014.5
work_keys_str_mv AT diazcanejacovadongam predictorsofoutcomeinearlyonsetpsychosisasystematicreview
AT pinacamacholaura predictorsofoutcomeinearlyonsetpsychosisasystematicreview
AT rodriguezquirogaalberto predictorsofoutcomeinearlyonsetpsychosisasystematicreview
AT fraguasdavid predictorsofoutcomeinearlyonsetpsychosisasystematicreview
AT parelladamara predictorsofoutcomeinearlyonsetpsychosisasystematicreview
AT arangocelso predictorsofoutcomeinearlyonsetpsychosisasystematicreview