Cargando…

Re-Analysis of the Uncertainty of the 0.895 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1691) Sphere Standards

The uncertainties of the mean diameters of the nominal 1.0 µm SRM(®) 1690 polystyrene spheres and of the nominal 0.3 µm SRM(®) 1691 polystyrene spheres are recomputed using the current NIST Guidelines for computing uncertainty. The revised expanded uncertainty (approximately 95 % confidence level) f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mulholland, G. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27308101
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.110.004
_version_ 1782429551389835264
author Mulholland, G. W.
author_facet Mulholland, G. W.
author_sort Mulholland, G. W.
collection PubMed
description The uncertainties of the mean diameters of the nominal 1.0 µm SRM(®) 1690 polystyrene spheres and of the nominal 0.3 µm SRM(®) 1691 polystyrene spheres are recomputed using the current NIST Guidelines for computing uncertainty. The revised expanded uncertainty (approximately 95 % confidence level) for SRM(®) 1690 polystyrene spheres is equal to 0.005 µm compared to previous value of 0.008 µm. The revised expanded uncertainty for SRM(®) 1691 is equal to 0.004 µm compared to the previous value of 0.007 µm. The major cause of the reduction in the uncertainty for the 1.0 µm spheres is from a decrease in the recomputed uncertainty of the refractive index of the polystyrene spheres. The 1.0 µm spheres were used in calibrating the electron microscope used to size the 0.3 µm spheres, and the reduction in the uncertainty of 1.0 µm SRM(®) uncertainty was the biggest factor in the decrease in the uncertainty of the 0.3 µm spheres.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4849563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48495632016-06-15 Re-Analysis of the Uncertainty of the 0.895 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1691) Sphere Standards Mulholland, G. W. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol Article The uncertainties of the mean diameters of the nominal 1.0 µm SRM(®) 1690 polystyrene spheres and of the nominal 0.3 µm SRM(®) 1691 polystyrene spheres are recomputed using the current NIST Guidelines for computing uncertainty. The revised expanded uncertainty (approximately 95 % confidence level) for SRM(®) 1690 polystyrene spheres is equal to 0.005 µm compared to previous value of 0.008 µm. The revised expanded uncertainty for SRM(®) 1691 is equal to 0.004 µm compared to the previous value of 0.007 µm. The major cause of the reduction in the uncertainty for the 1.0 µm spheres is from a decrease in the recomputed uncertainty of the refractive index of the polystyrene spheres. The 1.0 µm spheres were used in calibrating the electron microscope used to size the 0.3 µm spheres, and the reduction in the uncertainty of 1.0 µm SRM(®) uncertainty was the biggest factor in the decrease in the uncertainty of the 0.3 µm spheres. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2005 2005-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4849563/ /pubmed/27308101 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.110.004 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Article
Mulholland, G. W.
Re-Analysis of the Uncertainty of the 0.895 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1691) Sphere Standards
title Re-Analysis of the Uncertainty of the 0.895 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1691) Sphere Standards
title_full Re-Analysis of the Uncertainty of the 0.895 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1691) Sphere Standards
title_fullStr Re-Analysis of the Uncertainty of the 0.895 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1691) Sphere Standards
title_full_unstemmed Re-Analysis of the Uncertainty of the 0.895 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1691) Sphere Standards
title_short Re-Analysis of the Uncertainty of the 0.895 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm Diameter (NIST SRM(®) 1691) Sphere Standards
title_sort re-analysis of the uncertainty of the 0.895 µm diameter (nist srm(®) 1690) and the 0.269 µm diameter (nist srm(®) 1691) sphere standards
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27308101
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.110.004
work_keys_str_mv AT mulhollandgw reanalysisoftheuncertaintyofthe0895μmdiameternistsrm1690andthe0269μmdiameternistsrm1691spherestandards